Bloody real.
1 Like
Is it reasonable? No, not really. But this is Gaijin’s spaghetti code in action, not a bias.
1 Like
You are not talking about the battle rating 11.7 but I am, what you did is cherry picking a specific battle rating where USSR vehicle is the most numbered and claim this as Russian bias. In my case I did the same but I’m not claiming any kind of bias, I’m saying that two nations has approximately the same amount of vehicles MBTs and this isn’t a confirmation of bias,
Compare USA or USSR to Japan for example, both has times more vehicles than Japan holding only two viable MBTs for a battle rating 12.0 line-up, should the Type 10 be lowered in battle rating because of that as you said the Abrams and Leopard should, obviously not.
2 Likes
So why did you suggest this was a Cope thread if it’s based in facts that you agree with?
2 Likes
It’s not sphagetti code when it’s literally been datamined in the past that Gaijin fudged the detonation rate to Ivan tank’s benefit…
1 Like
I see Russian bias, its automatically a cope thread. This is the way of the forums :^)
3 Likes
Yes, because there are undeniable facts that prove bias but you must regardless call it cope because you must defend the snail’s BS practices whenever they are called out.
Like, come on dude. Do better for yourself.
1 Like
Lol USSR may have only 2 12.0 tanks, but those 2 shouldn’t be able to just roll in and 1 shot u while u non-pen them or they just eat the spall, also I would like to see you hitting the deck immediately after spawning ur precious unbiased SU-34
2 Likes
And it isn’t a bias that Germany and Sweden absolutely wreck every single nation because they don’t have tanks to compete?
No, it isn’t. This is how Gaijin makes money. They flip-flop the meta and do this stuff so people buy into new tech trees.
No, Soviet vehicles aren’t handheld. This is 2025 mate.
(And no, I don’t agree with these business practices)
2 Likes
I could also cherry-pick that Russian T-series armor values are overperforming.
I could also cherry-pick that T-series ERA is overperforming.
I can also cherry-pick that their ammo det rates are lower because Gaijin fudged the code. This has been proved in datamines, btw.
I can also cherry-pick that many of their vehicles are lower BR than they should be.
I have so much ammo to throw you under the bus without breaking a sweat. You cannot win here.
1 Like
Damn, i logged of for 40mins and this topic already went into rage bait and mental gymnastics of dudes who try to prove and disprove muh bias
1 Like
everyone in this thread is clueless
Show me.
I have heard of this, but show me.
Around the 9.7-10.3 range? None.
3 Likes
I don’t play Su-34, I’m not a air battle player. But based on that why no one’s talking about the battle rating 6.7 to 7.7 to 10.7 vehicles, specially in air vehicles? Same way the Swedish battle rating 8.7, in what I can see this is simply ignorance.
USA has (and other nations that has the same vehicles) can easily engage targets with decent weaponry with little effort, same way Sweden also can do, is this also bias? I don’t think so, but if you want to believe that is better for you complain over and over again, presenting no argument (like the thread’s original post) with only unrelated numbers (in this case amount of vehicles available to play at specific battle rating) I can do nothing to change or at least give you another perspective instead of yourself try to improve in the game.
1 Like
If Soviets are handheld why is your performance in Soviet vehicles the same as other tech trees?
4 Likes
Ivan top tier T-series also have spall liners like the 122 and Leos, which is the primary reason why the 122 and Leos run roughshod so much. Also, 8 times out of 10 all 3 nations are on the same team so neither of them have to suffer fighting eachother.
You can call it Meta flip-flopping, and sometimes it is, but it’s not always the case. And yes, Soviet vehicles are absolutely handheld. Russia is the most handheld nation in the game and it always has been.
1 Like
Only the T-90M gets spall liners, and that thing is hot ass. I’ve played it, it is not good.
Your inability to aim for the same weakspots found from 9.3-12.0 does not mean they’re handheld.
5 Likes
Stated BR range is 9.7 to 10.3, both the T-80UD and TURMS are 10.3.
When you do play something often, your stats don’t improve, and either you only try in the 292, or you just have a slightly above average consistent performance regardless of what you play.
1 Like
Ngl, if you downtiered the nato tanks, I might cry. I’m playing 8.7-9.0 Britain rn, and it’s bad enough facing and xm-1, please not full fledged abrams. I only have apds (except rooikat)
You mean the " weakspots " that magically turn out to not be weakspots at a random bloody percentage on a regular basis? If I shoot a T-series in the side and hit the ammo that should be it. It’s cooked. Instead what we get is that at a random chance nothing happens and I die. Shoot the breach frontally? Oh too bad, my shell shattered and so I die. Shoot the driver port? Oh too bad the shell shattered.
Find me another nation’s MBT line where the weakspots like to not be weakspots on a regular basis. You won’t because it’s only Russia that gets to play that bogus card that much. I’ve been playing this game a long time dude and even to this day it’s Russian vehicles that get to bullshit code their way out of situations on a regular basis where instead they should be absolute slag heaps.
Cute flag.
1 Like