You folks want to resort to stat-shaming simply because you don’t actually have an argument against me.
I don’t even main Germany lmfao.
Again, the T-72s aren’t as bad as people want to say they are. If it was IRL then the argument absolutely holds water but in this game? No, they don’t hold water. It’s also not fair because the Abrams was the only MBT America had for 10.0-10.3 and it lost it, to get what, an overblown tank destroyer that has no offensive capability? The 120S is dogwater. Yes, Germany lost the Leo 2 but at least they have the 2K so they have something with offensive capability. Russia doesn’t have to worry about losing one or two MBTs because they have 2-3 more to run in the same match even exluding the use of back-ups. It’s an absolute discrepancy and indicates clear bias.
First off, if you used your eyes to read you’d see I’m not talking about 9.3 and even if we did include 9.3 - Russia still has the most MBTs compared to everyone else.
You lose. Thanks for playing.
I’d love to see Russia genuinely be ignored for 6 months so other nations can get hardware, especially the minor nations.
1 Like
I’d like to see the US not get more stuff, actually. They’ve gotten 4 top tier jets this update, very powerful ones. What did Russia get? 1 Missle Bus jet with no maneuverability and 2 useless SPG’s at the same BR as the OP PZH2000…
Maybe get your bias outta here…
Okay Mr. Had-A-Meltdown-Over-The-Fox. Go crawl back into your hole that is your closed moaning thread about the Fox. Also, cute flag. Here’s your L. Keep having a skill issue over the Fox.
I love how you entirely dodge his statement, because its true, and resort to insults… lol
1 Like
Overperforming armor LoS for starters.
ERA overperforms in protection department, including the ERA that isn’t useful for kinetic munitions yet works against them when it shouldn’t.
We also have datamined coding of Russian ammo carousal of the T-series tanks being more resistant to being ammo-racked compared to everyone else.
No, he’s full of it and I disregard everything he says as a matter of principle. He’s not worth actually engaging with.
It’s typical for them.
1 Like
From what I recall, Germany hs the resistant ammo.
Also, ERA slightly under preforms, not over.
1 Like
OP? They’re glorified light tanks with long reload and a large outline, and their APFSDS is pretty garbage. They’re very mid even for 9.3
Real and True. Not even worth playing in their BR range.
6s for the Kpz/MBT70 and 7.5s for the Xm803 is “long”
Right…
Conveniently forgetting their toptier gun handling and mobility I see… not to mention their “mid” dart pens everything fine.
It wouldn’t hurt my feelings if the Big 3 as a whole got ignored for 6 months so the minor nations could get proper attention. Also, calling it a missile bus jet with no maneuverability is pretty lackluster - It is more than agile enough for what it is from what I’ve seen and it gets good A2A and A2G - Well, busted A2G actually - options. But, sure, let’s leave that out because " Russia Suffers " or some other bullsh the IvanBoos like to claim. Also, the 2S19Ms lack a LRF but have shells that require far less reliance on RNG -APHE, HEAT - Which is why they’re 7.0/7.3 and not 7.7 - Though I will concede that the PZH2Ks can go up to 8.0 and chill with the VIDAR since they do have LRF.
Lol a flag.
-
That’s only aced crew reload iirc
-
No, the dart doesn’t pen everything fine even with its own BR area.
They have autoloaders so their reload isn’t affected by crew level.
1 Like
To add to this;
XM803 is 7.5 seconds reloading for purely APFSDS.
Same goes for the MBT-70
It’s for the Kpz-70 that the reload for APFSDS is 6 seconds.
And I will correct that all 3 use autoloaders so loader skill is irrelevant. Why the Kpz-70 reloads faster though, I have no idea.
