There’s a difference between insulting someone and proving they’re arguing in bad faith.
My claims match my statistics. So when I say something like “Russian tanks in War Thunder are quite bad actually”, you can look at my stats in them and see that my K/Ds in Russian vehicles are generally lower than vehicles of other nations at the same BR, which aligns with my statement.
You’re implying that doing poorly in a vehicle is proof that vehicle is overpowered.
I’m saving this.
Exactly.
Anyone saying that something is OP should have much better stats in it than his account average, otherwise they’re just parroting things because they have a grudge with a certain nation.
You have a bone average WR of 50% in the past month, clearly you aren’t making an above average effort in this aspect. Please stop making excuses when it comes to your player skill. You aren’t a skilled player, just admit it.
:^)
Real.
Wrong.
95% of matches end because of kills. One team has 2 people left versus 12, of course the tickets will run out because of ‘caps’ since they can’t even leave their spawn. Capping is borderline useless.
There’s no need to talk about someone’s skill when u main Russia
Lol if you have done some research you will quickly find out that he also played UK, Israel, Japan and USA and he maintained good records in all those vehicles many claims weak, even the record of his Abrams is many times better than yours. I guess USA mains really live up to their stereotypes, and you also happen to play some so-called OP USSR vehicles and your record somehow looks shit yet you think they are easier to do well? You look like someone even less qualified to talk about someone’s skill lmao
Doing poorly in a vehicle can mean it’s OP IF that performance is vastly more than all other vehicles they use.
He doesn’t even have sep V2 lol, ur point just got disproven, also only nations u play are Germany and USSR so don’t talk about skill. Most of ur games are in Obj. 279 so I understand how much skill u have.
gaijin: seems perfectly balanced to me
I haven’t mained Russia in a hot minute. In the past 2 months, my 20th most played vehicle is Russian, with the next one being 29th.
I do however have the M1A1, which does fight top tier a bit. Even in a 12.0 lobby the M1A1 is still extremely strong.
You also have 1 Rank 8 vehicle that isn’t American, being the T 80 U (Sweden), so should I throw your argument right back at you?
if you wanna go into nations having a ton of vehicles in some particular BR range, then let me bring up some examples…
USA: 7 very potent medium and heavy tanks in the 5.0 - 5.7 BR range, 9(!!!) MBTs in the 11.3 - 12.0 range
Germany: 6 potent medium and heavy tanks in the 3.3 - 3.7 range, 6 Leopard tanks in the 11.7 - 12.0 range
UK: 7 Challengers in the 11.7 - 12.0 range
Japan: 4 of the best MBTs at 11.3
China: 4 potent MBTs at 11.0
France: 4 extremely strong medium and heavy tanks at 7.7, 6 MBTs at 12.0
Sweden: 4 strong MBTs in the 11.3 - 12.0 range
Israel: 5 MBTs at 8.7, 8(!!!) MBTs in the 9.0 - 9.3 range, 6 MBTs in the 11.3 - 12.0 range
All of that without even bringing up light tanks, which gives nations like Italy, Japan, Sweden or France the strongest lineups in the game. By your logic, Gaijin has a bias towards ISRAEL, not USSR. Your argument is extremely flawed in many ways, which might be explained by the fact you’re not positive in any of your tanks.
Crazy how people nitpick something they hate and start complaining without looking into the matter any further
If you had look further and stop cherry-picking, I also have NATO’s vehicles that have similar KD as the Object 279 lol why does he need to have a sep v2 to prove a point? when your M1 Abrams also barely hit 1 kd, maybe I should also pick a random vehicle just to say you are not relevant since you don’t even play one of the Challenger or Merkavas so your opinion doesn’t matter, do you realize how ridiculous it sounds lol?
Big boy talk for someone that also doesn’t play them lol
That brother was tryna play it off as if M1A1 is easier to “do well”
Meanwhile his M1A1:
0.9KD
Another day of USA mains clinging to🗑️arguments like its life support as they continue to throw shit at walls to see what sticks loooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
The M1A1 and M1A2 SEP are not really comparable, the M1A1 is very OP and the SEP is practically a marginally better version with the better thermals and cheek armor that’s an entire BR higher.
But the cheek armor doesn’t really matter because your weak spots are the same on both variants. It’s like putting the Olifant Mk.1A and the Sho’t Kal Dalet an entire BR apart.
Oh and the M1A1 faces things like T-72Bs or Type 96s, the M1A2 doesn’t (under normal matchmaker)
I did pair the IPM1 and F/A-18C (Early) together at 12.3 for a few matches, it did fine tbh.