No, you’re just lost in your sauce of whatever substances you’re on because your arguments are fundamentally worthless and do nothing to counter mine. You should log off and sober up, first.
Yes, those rounds are artificially nerfed and need to be corrected.
Yes, and no. Mobilty means next to nothing because Gaijin keeps screwing the maps over and turning them into World of Tanks maps where we’re stuck with 3 lanes and nothing but head-ons. Also doesn’t help that Ivan armor is overperforming and Gaijin loves messing with the code for ammo detonation chance % so that Russia gets to say " Nuh-uh " when the ammo carousal gets hit often enough that it’s not even comical.
120S is a goofy vehicle that’s just a glorified tank destroyer. Least the AMBT can act like an MBT for it’s BR spot.
Lolmao. I don’t statpad.
Out of 105 respawns, I died 99 times.
Out of 107 respawns, I died 99 times.
Out of 125 respawns, I died 101 times.
Out of 109 respawns, I died 100 times.
If I was statpadding, I would not have died on 95%+ of my spawns. I play super aggressively, and pay the price for it.
In my opinion the XM-803 is far in a better position, the fact that still at battle rating 9.0 yet keeping similar performance to the MBT-70/KPz-70, shows how this vehicle can be user-friendly. Yet the ammunition doesn’t have the best values, it’s overshadowed by the armor and mobility. In other hand the OF-40 (MTCA) and AMX-30 Super has to use their superior ammunition and mobility to counter its poor armor values.
Yeah, sure, with less than 100 battles you have more than position for talking, pardon, mighty War Thunder player.
If my argument is nonsense is because you did in the last three hours and 112 replies to this thread. I have nothing to prove because you haven’t presented nothing in reality, I’m trying to convice you to use the T-55AM-1 and see by yourself if the battle rating 9.7 and battle rating 10.3 Soviet vehicles are indeed overperforming.
XM803 is an amazing tank in my experience, its just a bit different to play.
good hull down tank destroyer with a giraffe neck that can actually eat shells but speed of a turtle
eh true the M735 can pen ~350mm at insert distant(probably close range), M774 is correct because its just an improve M735 and XM578E1 should be close to ~310mm or Gaijin can give them XM578E4(which is better, slightly longer penetrator and 4 fins stablizers)which would give significant pen to it
and yes the M735 vs XM578E4 are extremely close
true its actually a really good mbts, it has speed, somehow better armor than the kpz and mbt
agree
Your argument is nonsense for two reasons;
-
Your english writing and comprehension skills are awful. Obviously, it’s not your first language but you make no attempt to clean it up to sound even moderately comprehensible. That’s your issue to fix, and nobody else’s.
-
You keep harping on about the 55AM-1 but it’s not even in the BR range I’m discussing, so you’re still way lost in your own sauce.
Go ahead, speak another language fluently.
Use it to grind 10.3 Russian vehicles you muppet.
2 Likes
how does any of this prove this so called “russian bias”? i honestly dont understand, having 5 mbts is somehow op?
what a fun thread with lots of civil arguing :)
6 Likes
Idk man i’m here for the 🍿
1 Like
ah yes🦅🇺🇸🔥🍿
It’s not a good hulldown vehicle because the breach is easy to disable and exploit to shoot into the turret ring if not the ring directly. The 120S is a very middlin’ vehicle that’s made awful by the lackluster line-up it’s part of. USA had some offensive power when the Abrams was still 10.3 but because the IvanBoos cried like little girls over an undermodeled Abrams that was and still is mid now USA is stuck with a line-up that has no offensive capability - Only defensive, meaning that Russia in many of the matches gets to just hold W, take objectives, and point and click on just about everything. It’s no balanced.
fair point
the M60 would be better if they make turret ring volumetric, fix the model, change the hydraulic
pump position like on the abrams(WHICH THEY HAVENT WHEN THEY MAKE TURRET RING IDENTIFIED AS TURRET BASKET, SOMEHOW) and give it the 1200hp engine like on the M60 AMBT(yes they have the same engine and engine deck expansion)
1 Like
-
I don’t need to, as english is my first language and I’m here in the english side of the forum so I don’t have to concern myself with taking any extra steps to make sure what I’m saying is easy to read and comprehend. Anyone still having comprehension issues with anything I say is either ignorant or english just isn’t their native language.
-
Nah, I don’t think so. You want me to invest that kind of time into WT these days you can pay me in hard cash, otherwise hard pass.
the breach is easy to disable
so? just like any other mbt? btw nothing can disable you if you click on them with you lolpen gigadart
Keep on rambling about 9.7-10.3 Ruski MBT’s being handheld then, we can’t help you.
5 Likes
Yes, when compared to everyone else they don’t even have half the number.
Even if you remove the premiums from the equation, Russia still has more MBT access in the BR range and can deploy more MBTs per match, including back-ups. It is infact a massive balance issue that lends credence to the Russian Bias argument.
Yeah, but Gaijin won’t because they got a hate boner for the US and the minor nations, so it’ll be a cold day in hell before they fix those things.
1 Like
I’ll keep bringing how it’s Bias up as much as I see fit, with or without our help, not that your help is even needed in the first place.
half of these mbt’s are not even good, would you really want to spawn a turms against a 2a4? my experience mainly comes from me lolpenning them through ufp
i am pretty sure the only rooski outstanders in the 9.7-10.3 range are the 80ud and t64b, the others are quite uncomfortable to play
1 Like