Yeah ok you’re just posting to contradict me, hence this :
7.7 is actually relatively balanced bar for heavies in full uptiers.
immediately followed by :
Sorry what? the somau SM and french mediums solid shut scythes through their armour.
T32E1 is also a massively armoured monster at those BRs which has a better round than the russians, don’t see it on the list.
You’ve also got at 6.7 the arguably under BRd’ Tiger 2s, 7.0 the damn T29 which is really strong
implying there is, in fact, no balance.
Anyway, bro just wants to win the argument I guess (or ragebaits I’m not sure anymore).
EDIT : I forgot to say you’re only complaining because Russia doesn’t have the bias at these 8-9.7 BRs.
HEAT FS being universally borked for a long time is no fault of the T-54 it also happens with HEAT fired by the T-54.
I’ve had heat out the 105 do absolutely nothing to leopard 1s when hit in the UFP, hell happens now to this day.
No it isn’t man, get your head out the damn sand lol, HEAT FS has been broken in the game for years, even standard heat has been borked when it gives you nothing for a shot which should of wiped the enemy.
You are actually choosing to ignore any and every single thing which goes against the theory of russian bias.
the T-54 is one of the weakest tanks at 8.0 due to the mobility, turret traverse, gun traverse, limited depression as well as the armours ineffectiveness at resisting heat. You can shoot it in the UFP and one tap it lol.
You got gaijined and are taking it as hyper russian bias when ever something goes wrong.
Hell I shot a turm 3 which someone uptiered to 11.7 with a 120MM heat from an ariete and it did nothing xD
I literally cannot play it against russia only I don’t have some mystical control of the match maker to force it to do that xD.
11.0? I’m tlaking 11.7 - 12.7 not anything lower than that, which means
A constantly within BMPT range where there can be more than 4 per side.
B constantly using 9.7s at 11.7 and doing quite alright with it.
So you go take a VRCC into a 12.7 game and get 4 -8 kill sand get bcak to me mate
all of the above occurances are game mechanics flaws (overcluttered damage models, rng ammo and fuel detonations, spalling etc) but you would scream bias if that happened to a russian tank
That’s my point, he doesn’t understand that the game has it’s own issues outwith just “russian bias” and now he’s going around obsessing over it on almost every post.
I can’t tell you the amount of times I’ve dinges some paper target with HEAT and did nothing
My man… it’s the last sentence of the post you replied to, on its own.
I stopped commenting on the BMPT’s BR after the end of my cross analysis that proved it could be 11.3/11.7. Any higher would require new evidence that overpowers the evidence of cross-analysis.
For reference, this was the cross analysis that criticized BMPT being 10.3:
M4A3E2 is 2.0 BR higher than M4 Sherman [2.3 higher than one or two 3.3 Shermans].
IS-4M is 2.3 BRs higher than KV-122.
Matilda III vs most A13s: 2.3.
Heavy armor without weapons changes doesn’t see more than 2.3 currently.
So that proved that BMPT should be at least 11.3 based on the fact its offensive capabilities are at 9.3 without armor.
So no, I’m not commenting on its BR at this time; there’s no new information.
I’ll talk about what’s better than BMPT: Challenger 2, T-72B3, T-80U [It’s in Sweden too].
And I can tell you effective BMPT hunters with less HEAT protection than the above: M1A1, Merkavas, IPM1, Ariete, MBT-2000…
But I cannot tell you if all of those vehicles’ BRs are correct, because 11.7 - 12.7 is heavily decompressed to the point M1A1 and Leclerc are 1.0 apart despite being 95% similar in mobility, armor, and lethality.
Honestly, it should just be removed unless they model a kinetic round ripping off the entire turret since that’s what would happen to those twigs holding 4 ATGMs and 2 machine guns.
It’s called russian bias, I just got another nuke with VBCI only without sweating. Russia was on the other side.
It’s nearly unfeasible at top top tier if you’re not on Russia side. Never had so easy times getting a nuke.
At 9.7, Russia seems to loose as much as they win. Again, for the 154th time, when you play NATO side at top top tier, you loose 80% of the time.
I have been playing 30-40 games at 9.7 and it’s refreshing, it actually seems I win and loose equally, whatever side I’m on (Russia or NATO). Again, it is NOT the case at top top tier, large majority of the games played are won by Russia.
I don’t know how to say it another way, just play 30 games in a row and see it by yourself. Russia wins too much at top top tier because the tier is simply too much unbalanced in favor of Russia.
First : it did happen, litterally just check the related game at the exact time I posted (my last game was the one where it happened, and I disconnected then posted about this bs).
Second : you always shoot on the most angled part top of the UFP, did you really expect not to bounce ? lmao. Just shoot at the manlet as everyone else. Or LFP. Or turret neck.
Man I’ve got couple of nukes, I know when it is a sequel of skill issues on my part, and when there are objective facts showing a bias is put in place to make a particular nation win more than usual, lol