Russian Bias in 2026?

Well those timed shellls actually work on IR tracking, since it calculates that explosion time in that spot where that lead indicator spots, so no they are not useless anymore.

But yes it’s not so good as proxy but it is not completely obsolete anymore.
Been having fun when my mate plays top tier israel and he picks those low flying jets away in merkavas :D

1 Like

Those stats are pretty cute.

3 Likes

he isn’t good, at all mate.
His average team position is in the bottom half. I am not a fan of Stat shark at all for the record either lol.
his average score is under 1k which means he does very little per game,

I mean it’s went from being completely obsolete to niche af and maybe decent for helis.

I love the proxys at the 9.0 range for china TBH.

1 Like

What’s the point of the image ? We can see large majority of nato mbts are green everywhere.

You don’t play leos or t-series, you don’t have armor, simple

Latency affects everyone depending on everyone’s situation, that’s why 0.4sec is nothing

Keep coping russian main.

It all depends on usage.
F&F missiles got ups and downs, yes those dont kill targets so often, but when having -2 crew members in abrams in first minute of game is death sentence.
And you really can spam em , depending on vehicle. (FRECCIA)
And those work on helos like a charm (Not LDIRCM ofc)
and you start seeing those from 10.7.
On ussr , and CV missile you need to see target all the time, and those are useless against helos, if that is not hovering inside 5km range, and not looking anything.
That ir track on ATGM is seriously cherrypicking 1 of 1000 shots.

Abrams still have best shell even lacking ir track, maybe someday we will get it.

1 Like

Youre a big boy, you know how to find the respective threads and bug reports

Its very unique, no other vehicle in the game gets a continous belt that separates at one point to prevent domino explosions

So your example is that a missile launched from 2-3 km above the target will indeed hit the target from above?

What are you trying to say? I was refering to the Shell storage on the Soyuz thats complete fake in case that was not clear.

None of what i said are “technologies”, they are in game fakes existing to make russia stronger than it should be and they are unique to the russian tree. Its just funny to call them technologies since they are so advanced that not even real life can recreate them

4 Likes

Point is, the Mi-28NM is the only helicopter in the game with a completely fake protection area in the front out of an emitter that doesn’t exist because Gaijin blatantly decided to make this helicopter artificially stronger than it should be.

AH-64E and Z-10 both have the ability to generate a complete LDIRCM sphere around the heli by the position of their emitters on the wing tip. The only question that can be asked is: Can they rotate the laser reflector by -1°. If they can, then its a complete sphere like what we have in-game.

Sir, as I stated, 70% of your >= 60% winrate games are due to Leos/T-series.

Yourself have chosen armor over anything else lol, what can I say

gonna ignore the abrams and CR2 as well as the Types and what not?
or the Chinese MBTs? xD

0.4 is massive mate, It’s why I just aced my crew in the leopard 1A1 L/44 , went from 7.1 seconds to 6.7 and now I can finally out load most folks I come across especially the russian MBTs with 7 seocnds.

You have absolutely 0 legs to stand on stats wise, but I reckon you’ve ignored me cause I’ve proved your BS wrong time and time again xD
@_Renzo just ignore the guy hes definitely trolling at this stage.

Maybe time for the mods to once again shut a thread down due to immaturity.

3 Likes

Going on 8.0 tech / 11.7 Squadron china and yes, I just love that WZ305
I just wonder why it is so overlooked, they got seriously fun and good vehicles.
also having dart and laser range in 7.7 light sometimes feels cheating :D

1 Like

As I stated, latency is different for anyone, that’s why 0.4sec is nothing.

Some will have +2sec, some +0.5, some +0.01, the 0.4sec are diluted into these differences.

Sure, now look at my top most played top tier MBTs and see which I actually play a lot.

2 Likes

There is really no point to continue argue with you if you say spike and mmp missiles are not broken and useless

Just say you don’t want your russian lineup to be nerfed man. I just don’t get the point of playing a game where Russia has 80% winrate every game and NATO loose everything.

I don’t really care about which one you play the most, what I care is with which ones you win the most lol

You win the most with Leos and T-series, hence you win the most with armor.

Everyone who disagrees with me is a Russian main, even when they’re not.

False.

He’s not wrong in the case of ground sim top bracket lul

You say that I choose armor over anything else, but if that is true than the T-series and 2A7s would be some of my most played rank 8s.

But would you look at that, the 2A7s are ranked 15th and 16th, the BVM 18th and the 90M 28th as my most played tanks. So yeah it seems like I don’t choose armor that often at all.

2 Likes

Not a real gamemode lalalalala
Anyway its still not 80%

Oh yeah they are either baiting and doing a decent job or actually serious and being braindead.

I just can’t let it go.

2 Likes