Russian Bias in 2026?

[IHаteCAS]

@SadRIPer

I prefer being a good player and still having armor lol.

Except you aren’t, and you don’t think like one :)

[SFmerc]

@SadRIPer

3 : Are we talking about the totally broken-don’t-do-any-damage-80%-of-the-time spike and MMP missiles ? I rather not have then and be lighter than have them ngl. Russia has proxy, especially with the BMPT and its op fire rate which can delete any low flying cas, even from 5km away. Can’t do that with bushmaster (because no proxys and slow firerate), unless the cas is close/very close.

We all know how busted Terminator is, there is complete another thread for crying that loud.
And now, just tell me HOW MANY USSR MBT’S HAVE PROXY AND IR TRACK combined, since that is so OP. ( not) in MBT.

And yes, Puma doesnt have Ahead, Swedish strf doesnt have proxy, KF41, Jaguar. etc.
But yes Usa is lacking ir track on vehicles what could use it, and what got that doesnt have proper ammo to use it.

[SadRIPer]

Who cares, it’s ALL GREEN EVERYWHERE

Compare that to russian mbts lmaoo. You have dots of green here and there, it’s ridiculous.

NATO MBTs armors are PAPER.

[IHаteCAS]

@Necrons31467 Do you have that armor image on hand?

[SadRIPer]

You just ignored the whole rest of the argument lmao. I literally explained why, like wtf.

[AlvisWisla]

Which is why Soviets are losing at the top end again. CAS reliance destroys spawn point endurance.
It’s probably close to the #1 reason I see losses across the BRs.
Single death leaving I don’t think is as big of a cause as CAS reliance.

@CyrusJacob

for helis

@H_ngma

AGMs with correct lofting

No mention of helicopters, and that’s not a technology. “Correct” is also a goalpost shifting claim, and I’d love to see the proof that LMURs are correct. ;)

No one has ever corrected me on my statement that Mi-28NM’s coverage is incorrect.
If you think I am wrong, you’re more than welcome to prove to me and everyone else here that Mi-28NM’s LDIRCM coverage is correct.
But with myself and @H_ngma stating it’s incorrect when we have proof that it’s incorrect, I doubt you’ll prove otherwise.

[Necrons31467]

[MotorolaCRO]

You explained nothing.
Latency affects everyone, not just NATO tanks but please keep on with your ragebait, it’s somewhat amusing.

[CyrusJacob]

@AlvisWisla

No one has ever corrected me on my statement that Mi-28NM’s coverage is incorrect.
If you think I am wrong, you’re more than welcome to prove to me and everyone else here that Mi-28NM’s LDIRCM coverage is correct.

Read my post again for the love of God.
You said ‘all helicopters are protected by sphere when they shouldn’t be’. This statement is likely wrong for the AH-64E, it might very well be protected by a sphere IRL. Also, Mi-28NM is NOT protected by a complete sphere in game. It has a quarter sphere looking down and backward + one looking front and up.

The one looking front and up shouldn’t exist because there’s NO emitter there.

[H_ngma]

@AlvisWisla

1- Multiple tech trees.

Nope only LMUR lofts correctly
Correct is a very clear term, because every AGM besides the LMUR actually has plenty of first hand sources and videos to model the lofting trajectory after

@AlvisWisla

This was on at least one NATO IFV before BMPT was added. Which probably started the whole thing.

No it wasnt and it wasnt started by it. The BMPT got it as a deliberate addition to artificially buff it.

@AlvisWisla

This one admits it’s in many tech trees. Tornado F3 also has a faster scan rate than some AESA. ;)

No idea where you got that from, it does, in fact, not.

@AlvisWisla

• Definitely multiple tech trees.

Nope all other ships are based off of real life storages and examples except one with a placeholder visual model

@AlvisWisla

H-64E as well. Because currently all helicopters are protected in a sphere when they shouldn’t be.
Huge coverage yes, sphere no.

Nope, the 64E and Z10 both have their emitters on the wing stubs, they might not be able to cover a full sphere but they dont do quantum tunneling through the fuselage

[An_Pigeon]

@SadRIPer

an I stopped reading at “oplot is the best t80 with 6sec reload” while the bvm has exactly 6sec reload as well,

Catagorically wrong, the T80BVM firing its top tier round which is literally mid has a 6.4 second reload and is as far as I am aware the only tank in game with a different reload due to the type of APFSDS loaded.

@SadRIPer

Another russian main speaking non sense just to not admit Russia is clearly advantaged in the game, I’m tired of this

Alvis isn’t a russian main either mate…

@SadRIPer

nato mbts don’t have “over-lapping plates” because they have butter armor penable from anything from anywhere

They quite literally do have overlapping plates on many different parts of tanks, hence how some parts can get over 600MM of protection, it’s athe flaw of volumetric.

@SadRIPer

there are ammunition in the russian autoloaders which are supposed to explode when hit but simple don’t 90% of the time (yes, when I hit the autoloader with a 500mm dart, I expect it to pen the autoloader then the ammunition of the other side of it)

that same RNG is applied to literally every auto loader in game, I’ve got every high BR/ top tier auto loader and it’s the same-

@SadRIPer

• won’t argue the pantsir thing, pantsir is op, pantsir 2 will be even more

Pantsir isn’t OP , it never was OP it was just miles better than the competition.

@SadRIPer

• try fighting a 279 with a lower br tank, good look with that you wont pen from any side

Aim properly, only APDS struggles on it, use HEAT.

@SadRIPer

Pe-8 was op back in the days because it was the only plane with the big bomb capable of killing the entire team with 1 single bomb,

Never have I seen a full team get wiped with one PE8 bomb that’s 16 kills and back in the day would be 12 kills.
Even the damn 12000LB bomb would struggle to do that from the lancaster.

@SadRIPer

same with is-7

A strong tank but it’s by no means OP, it’s fine at it’s BR.

Bit like MAUS dropped and ruined the BRs when it was at 7.3 but get’s rolled on at 7.7 easily.

@SadRIPer

“Soviet MBTs are inferior to Abrams and Leopard 2A5 at the least, partially due to global mobility being incorrect” => already explained t series had +/- the same mobility at top tier in mid fight and how, please read up there

Leopard 2a5 has
better mobility
reload
round
turret armour
optics
gen 2 commander thermals.

need i continue?

Abrams?
better mobility
reload
round
optics
and gen 2 gunner thermals & commander thermals.

@SadRIPer

“Soviet high-caliber heavies are among the most difficult to use for players.” ok ragebait, guess having a very good pen heavy is bad in ur head

The soviet heavies, which you’ve never touched, are incredibly difficult to use mate.
They have a near 30 second reload without a maxed, expert crew.
Terrible gun handling.
No armour, and literally no gun depression

@SFmerc

Nope, just no room for any F&F helo on 12.0, and after those dropped to 12.7, used my german 12.7 lineup and it was 80% games 12.7

Even 11.3 helis are terrible now mate.

@SadRIPer

1 : Who cares about 0.4s. With the enormous servers ping, the latency from your monitor, gpu rendering the images, keyboard + mouse, your own body responding +/- faster, the time you need to spot an ennemy if this is a long range fight, your own ping depending on your Internet and localisation and sometimes even the latency of upscaling + framegen for the people using them, 0.4sec is absolutely nothing and unoticeable. 6.4sec = 6sec, period. It’s not like it was 6sec vs 8 sec. Beside, for other rounds, it’s still 6 sec.

0.4seconds is huge mate, especially considering most nato MBTs reload in 5 seconds aced and 5.3 expert that’s more than a whole second faster.

shows how little you know.

@SadRIPer

Russia has numerous vehicles with IRST : MBT + light tanks + IFV. They also have HE shells, proxy and ATGMs shells. Numerous NATO MBTs have none of those HE shells / proxy / atgms (none has atgms if I recall). So Russia has them all throughout the BRs, and some NATO nations simply have none. Unfair, unbalanced (hello France).

What russian MBT has IRST as well as aproxy shell?

@__Renzo__

EDIT: let me rephrase. The Abrams, Merkava, Type 10 and Leclerc are better in the hand of decent players, since said decent players can get more out of them than they can get out of the T-series.

Couldn’t say it better myself, hence why my M1A2 has a better KD than my BVM xD

@AlvisWisla

Type 90s,

Especially on the damn turret ring man, jesus shot one the other night with 3BM46 expecting it to slice through and hit the turret crew and got a “non pen”

@SFmerc

On close quarters , it really makes a difference, especially when you are on shot trade situation.
Been there plenty of times , and having 5s on abrams has made a difference plenty of times.

that 5 second reload with the 2nd highest penning conventional round in game is a blessing.

@SXTREME

unmatched Anti Air options,

What unmmatched AA, the IRIS T is the best SPAAin game followed by the CLAWS .

@SXTREME

player friendly, armor goes a long way to help someone clueless and it’s a lot easier to shoot an Abrams and cause internal damage than it is to shoot

If players owuld stop literally shooting them in the UFP then russian MBTs would be in an even worse standing than now.

@SadRIPer

This is Leclerc and Ariete front armor, as well as Abrams, Merkavas, Chally, Types and TKX. They all have the same patern : paper armor.

The CR2s don’t, abrams also don’t their turret armour is substantially better. the Abrams UFP is also proof to most rounds.
it’s the LFP and turret ring which shaft it.
it’s literally got 2 flaws and that is it.

CR2 you’ve never used so don’t bother to comment on it.

merkavas at least at 11.3 armour is useable and has saved me on more than one occassion
Type90s armour is pretty decent compared to what it was when I first got them.
BAck then it was literally paper and even DM13 could go clean through the turret into the ammo rack and kill the tank.

@SadRIPer

MBTs. Russian MBTs has less firepower than NATO MBTs, but doesnt mater because NATO MBTs have paper armor

Firepower is 100 percent more important than armour at sub 1km ranges when everyones firing post 500 pen darts.

you’re using a leclerc with a middling round, but unreal mobility, and firepower. Yet complaining about russian MBTs xD

hell your overall average score per match is barely 1000 mate, hate to say it but seriously? skill issue.

[An_Pigeon]

@MotorolaCRO

I don’t know why people are still engaging with this.

not entierly sure myself mate, but not often we all agree xD
got me, you, alvis etc all agreeing that this is total nonsense.

[_Renzo]

@SadRIPer

I prefer being a good player and still having armor lol.

Same, but not at the cost of severely worse mobility/handling, gun depression and/or firepower.

If I have to choose between the above I will alwys go for the first 3 over armor.

[IHаteCAS]

@CyrusJacob

Mi-28NM is NOT protected by a complete sphere in game. It has a quarter sphere looking down and backward + one looking front and up.

Just posting for reference, 28NM LDIRCM Coverage

Spoiler

[SadRIPer]

Stop with the ragebaits man, just stop.

Pantsir-S1 is literally the best top tier saclos spaa rn. 12-ready-to-fire missiles VS 8 for NATO spaas, multitarget firing system absent in nato spaas, guns absent in many nato spaas, so long it usually needs 3 FnF missiles to get destroyed (otherwise the missiles destroy thin air).

Also : to remind everybody about the next Pantsir 2 :

New 12.7 Pantsir :

• New 95Ya6M missiles ;
• 96 missiles with ammo crates ;
• 70km radar with no blindspot ;
• Mach 5 missile ;
• 75G max overload ;
• 40km launch range ;
• anti-drone mini missiles ;
• 6 main missiles + 24 mini missiles (for drones and atgms/bombs) ;
• 30mm guns ;
• of course, no NATO equivalent.

Both Pantsirs are completely op compared to nato spaas, period

[SFmerc]

@An_Pigeon

What russian MBT has IRST as well as aproxy shell?

I could spoil the fun, and there is 1. Since riper cant tell it us. ( Well timed not proxy)
And that is T90M. What is known for having awesome gun angle values, especially up.

[SadRIPer]

shark says otherwise, thank you for your participation though.

As a reminder, I never touched the bias and still considered good.

[An_Pigeon]

@SFmerc

I could spoil the fun, and there is 1. Since riper cant tell it us. ( Well timed not proxy)
And that is T90M. What is known for having awesome gun angle values, especially up.

i mean it’s a timed fuze shell it’s , and i say this with absolute sadness, useless for the most part.

You’re never gonna hit a moving target with one reliably as well as even be able to aim up for it.

He stated a proxy shell, not a fuze as well.

[_Renzo]

@SadRIPer

Increased ROF is false, some russian mbts have now 6sec reload as some NATO MBTs + the added latency argument I just stated.

Just counting latency for only one side is a massive cope argument.

[CyrusJacob]

@IHаteCAS

Just posting for reference, 28NM LDIRCM Coverage

Armone(don’t remember his exact name) had a really good picture of it on the forum. With the 3D model in blender of the heli + the areas of protection.