Just posting for reference, 28NM LDIRCM Coverage
1 Like
Stop with the ragebaits man, just stop.
Pantsir-S1 is literally the best top tier saclos spaa rn. 12-ready-to-fire missiles VS 8 for NATO spaas, multitarget firing system absent in nato spaas, guns absent in many nato spaas, so long it usually needs 3 FnF missiles to get destroyed (otherwise the missiles destroy thin air).
Also : to remind everybody about the next Pantsir 2 :
New 12.7 Pantsir :
- New 95Ya6M missiles ;
- 96 missiles with ammo crates ;
- 70km radar with no blindspot ;
- Mach 5 missile ;
- 75G max overload ;
- 40km launch range ;
- anti-drone mini missiles ;
- 6 main missiles + 24 mini missiles (for drones and atgms/bombs) ;
- 30mm guns ;
- of course, no NATO equivalent.
Both Pantsirs are completely op compared to nato spaas, period
I could spoil the fun, and there is 1. Since riper cant tell it us. ( Well timed not proxy)
And that is T90M. What is known for having awesome gun angle values, especially up.
2 Likes
shark says otherwise, thank you for your participation though.
As a reminder, I never touched the bias and still considered good.
i mean it’s a timed fuze shell it’s , and i say this with absolute sadness, useless for the most part.
You’re never gonna hit a moving target with one reliably as well as even be able to aim up for it.
He stated a proxy shell, not a fuze as well.
Just counting latency for only one side is a massive cope argument.
7 Likes
Armone(don’t remember his exact name) had a really good picture of it on the forum. With the 3D model in blender of the heli + the areas of protection.
I don’t want to get technical on a forum because jargon is the enemy of all.
Saying “sphere” to talk about the incorrect coverage of LDIRCM across platforms is the best word to use rather than “incorrect complex shape”.
@H_ngma
Where is the proof LMUR’s lofting is correct? And where is the video that compares it in-game to all other AGMs in the game with their source documents?
Hammers loft quite a lot themselves as an example.
“Correct” also isn’t a technology despite me entertaining the different goalpost.
Hammer screenshot of it literally dropping on a tank’s head from a 2000 - 3000 meter altitude launch from 28km away:
BMPT is one of many autocannon vehicles with complex ammo belts, it’s not unique.
Scan rate isn’t a technology is the point, and bringing it up is like bringing up MBT mobility. Not a technology.
Yes, and the movement of storage on some ships is done via quantum. Quantum is once again not a technology.
@SadRIPer
96 IR missiles isn’t a “gotcha”…
Mach 5 40km contact-only missile whose warhead is worse than Starstreak’s isn’t a “gotcha”.
NATO already has better SPAA in-game.
1 Like
I see the ego inflation tool is working well. You’re not good.
4 Likes
How many NATO nations have none of those, and don’t have simple HE nor ATGMs ? Use braincells pls
Most of sweedish ofvs have proxy. All spike and mmp nato missiles are trash, compared to russian atgms.
Well those timed shellls actually work on IR tracking, since it calculates that explosion time in that spot where that lead indicator spots, so no they are not useless anymore.
But yes it’s not so good as proxy but it is not completely obsolete anymore.
Been having fun when my mate plays top tier israel and he picks those low flying jets away in merkavas :D
1 Like
Those stats are pretty cute.
3 Likes
he isn’t good, at all mate.
His average team position is in the bottom half. I am not a fan of Stat shark at all for the record either lol.
his average score is under 1k which means he does very little per game,
I mean it’s went from being completely obsolete to niche af and maybe decent for helis.
I love the proxys at the 9.0 range for china TBH.
1 Like
What’s the point of the image ? We can see large majority of nato mbts are green everywhere.
You don’t play leos or t-series, you don’t have armor, simple
Latency affects everyone depending on everyone’s situation, that’s why 0.4sec is nothing
Keep coping russian main.
It all depends on usage.
F&F missiles got ups and downs, yes those dont kill targets so often, but when having -2 crew members in abrams in first minute of game is death sentence.
And you really can spam em , depending on vehicle. (FRECCIA)
And those work on helos like a charm (Not LDIRCM ofc)
and you start seeing those from 10.7.
On ussr , and CV missile you need to see target all the time, and those are useless against helos, if that is not hovering inside 5km range, and not looking anything.
That ir track on ATGM is seriously cherrypicking 1 of 1000 shots.
Abrams still have best shell even lacking ir track, maybe someday we will get it.
1 Like
Youre a big boy, you know how to find the respective threads and bug reports
Its very unique, no other vehicle in the game gets a continous belt that separates at one point to prevent domino explosions
So your example is that a missile launched from 2-3 km above the target will indeed hit the target from above?
What are you trying to say? I was refering to the Shell storage on the Soyuz thats complete fake in case that was not clear.
None of what i said are “technologies”, they are in game fakes existing to make russia stronger than it should be and they are unique to the russian tree. Its just funny to call them technologies since they are so advanced that not even real life can recreate them
4 Likes
Point is, the Mi-28NM is the only helicopter in the game with a completely fake protection area in the front out of an emitter that doesn’t exist because Gaijin blatantly decided to make this helicopter artificially stronger than it should be.
AH-64E and Z-10 both have the ability to generate a complete LDIRCM sphere around the heli by the position of their emitters on the wing tip. The only question that can be asked is: Can they rotate the laser reflector by -1°. If they can, then its a complete sphere like what we have in-game.
Sir, as I stated, 70% of your >= 60% winrate games are due to Leos/T-series.
Yourself have chosen armor over anything else lol, what can I say
gonna ignore the abrams and CR2 as well as the Types and what not?
or the Chinese MBTs? xD
0.4 is massive mate, It’s why I just aced my crew in the leopard 1A1 L/44 , went from 7.1 seconds to 6.7 and now I can finally out load most folks I come across especially the russian MBTs with 7 seocnds.
You have absolutely 0 legs to stand on stats wise, but I reckon you’ve ignored me cause I’ve proved your BS wrong time and time again xD
@_Renzo just ignore the guy hes definitely trolling at this stage.
Maybe time for the mods to once again shut a thread down due to immaturity.
3 Likes