You say that I choose armor over anything else, but if that is true than the T-series and 2A7s would be some of my most played rank 8s.
But would you look at that, the 2A7s are ranked 15th and 16th, the BVM 18th and the 90M 28th as my most played tanks. So yeah it seems like I don’t choose armor that often at all.
Not a real gamemode lalalalala
Anyway its still not 80%
Oh yeah they are either baiting and doing a decent job or actually serious and being braindead.
I just can’t let it go.
Sorry, was only 74% in October.
Ok what’s the argument to counter what I said ?
A reminder to everyone here :
NATO forces mainly loose WAY OFTEN against Russia than the contrary (aka the multiple screenshots I take the time to post here everytime, constantly showing 70-90% russian winrate at top tier), because :
I’m sure NATO players are experiencing higher latency that nullifies their reload speed advantage.
It’s March of 2026, I think it’s time to step up your ragebait.
Yes, it is so fun and not broken especially when I like to play light vehicles , getting decimated by a missile, what just had to see a lil piece of me, and I’m getting obileriated by that.
Or even better in 10.7-11.7 usa and getting helo just sniped out of something what you cant dodge.
Maybe those are useless then.
And still, havent played mainly soviets for long time on ground
Ground sim top bracket = Russia + China will ONLY fight NATO forces, and there will never be combined nations fighting each others (unlike in grb).
That is a proof and why Russia (+ China) has objectively 70-90% winrate at top tier. In grb, nato nations sometimes play along with Russia, so their winrate goes up thanks to that.
Again, play 100 +10.7 GRB games against Russia in a row and show me the wins VS losses. The russian winrate will be around 70-90%.
No. I’m just saying your best performance is with the leos and t-series (hence the 70% of >= 60% winrate games due to leos and t-series)
You can choose to play a tank a lot, without winning with it.
On the contrary, you can rarely play another tank, and have better winrates with it (in that case, the leos and t-series)
Thats literally not how it works. China also doesn’t pair with RU often.
And I did, yet you choose to ignore it because it disproves your utterly nonsensical point.
I proved you by A+B+C+Z with encyclopedia long private messages why Russia has the bias on this game.
Don’t act like you didn’t read all that and we didnt talk about it.
Can this french main stop destroying the reputation of nato players.
I have to ask you to use your gray matter please :
If I’m a russian main with 6.4sec reload fighting a nato mbt with 6sec reload, that I have 0.00000000000000000001sec latency and that my opponent has 0.4sec latency, it’s as if we both had 6sec reload.
That’s why I said the latency is different for everyone, and thus that the added 0.4sec reload speed can be diluted in that.
Ok good man, you’re an excellent player, but you didn’t show me yet the 100 +10.7 GRB games in a row against Russia with the wins VS losses.
No more coping, show me the games, and we’ll both see the russian winrate will be between 70-90%.
My US Abrams have mostly legacy stats from when I played them during the 2A7s initial reign of terror.
My M1A2T is currently sitting at a 70% winrate and 2.8 K/D.
Its literally right there.
Yes, it is so fun and not broken
Ok, you had me in the first half ngl. Gonna stop discussing with you now, bye bye.
holy cope. Just pulling a latency number out of your rear to help your argument.
Shoking, that when your BS is called out, this is your everytime response :D
