Russian Bias in 2026?

This got to be a joke. 🥀🥀

@SadRIPer has a 62% win rate in AH-64E.

Clearly suffering in his NATO tech tree. /s

3 Likes

But…but lmur…😢

Yeah this guy is trolling hard.

You didn’t count the VBCI + VBCI-2 + Jaguar + F16 + AH-64 I also use at top tier, independently from the others

Plus the terms and services of the game forbid you from playing it, you know that

Compare that to the 155% winrate of the mi-28nm

Oh I know it’s hopeless, but once I get curious about something I can’t stop.

Spoiler

8 games in so far and Russian winrate overall in these is 50%. Although those 3 losses were more up to incredibly incompetent teammates more than anything.

2 Likes

Keep on going until 20-30…

You’ll see the 50% slowly going towards 70%…

It shouldn’t even be a 50% to begin with. that Red desert game was a throw of gigantic proportions and we should have won that one against Russia easy.

1 Like

Soviets are slightly better on Red Desert than NATO tanks.
Less reliance on mobility, and more reliance on front armor.

1 Like

The Russian players barely got to do anything that game, which is the worst part.

My team roflstomped the enemy team and was very eager to spawncamp said enemy team, completely ignoring 2 US players that were just shooting them in the back. By the time some of the aware players killed these 2 they spawned 64Es and rolled what remained of our team.

2 Likes

1700 hours? I’ve over 4 thousand mate.

What because i’ve thousands of hours and game across multiple nations ver near every nation in game, compared to your barely 2 nations past rank 7?

Barely 200 lol

I gotta love this now, the fact that more and more people are starting to get the Ah64Es and showing that they’re just as blatantly OP as the LMUR slinging MI28 is quite funny.

You’ve provided evidence that the MM isn’t sitting anywhere near the way Sad is making out yet he still insists on it being this way.
The JAG slinging Apaches are such a pain in the rear end at top tier, especially now that people are ysing them more and more

1 Like

That’s not how percentages work, it can’t have a win rate higher than 100 percent mate.
It can only win up to all of aka 100 percent of the games it plays, it can’t somehow have 155% winrate.

You don’t understand humor apparently.

Pretty sure I’ve studied more maths that you did during your whole life tbh. I’m gonna stop talking to you, you’re starting to annoy me ngl

Another great 10.7 GRB performance on NATO side (the only win was along with Russia).

Quite frankly I don’t even understand why people still play NATO anymore, at least at 10.7. It’s loss after loss after loss after loss after loss after loss.

1 Like

The premium Harrier was insanely op when it got released

1 Like

funny that you only mention tanks what about other things like cas and missiles huh? just stop man… playing usa cas with mavericks vs playing russians with 38mt and others xDDD dont tell me usa is good xD

1 Like

Aster has had this for ages. IRIS-T radar is similar.


24 10.7 GRB games played in a row (as the U.S.).

11 victories, among them :

  • 6 victories against Russia ;
  • 5 victories along with Russia.

So Russia got 13 + 5 = 18 victories out of 24 games => 18/24 = 75% winrate.

Always, ALWAYS, way more losses than wins for NATO. Something is wrong at top tier and needs to be fixed (spike/mmp missiles broken, BMPT op, t-series modeling broken, NATO IFV nerfed-to-the ground). That’s why NATO loose more than they win.

1 Like

My main issue with this take is that we don’t know KD breakdown. We do no know the ratio between Plane-drone-helicopter (I believe that what counts as an air kill). For all we know the KD between helis kill - death could be really high we don’t know because the kd between plane kill - death could be low. We just don’t know.

If we look at global stats for January and compare the ground kill - death ration it’s as follows:

  1. Z-10ME: 2.48 (541,848 Ground Kills / 218,545 Deaths)

  2. Dutch AH-64E: 2.46 (63,230 Ground Kills / 25,710 Deaths)

  3. Mi-28NM: 2.45 (1,040,402 Ground Kills / 424,268 Deaths)

  4. US AH-64E: 2.09 (316,065 Ground Kills / 151,370 Deaths)

  5. Taiwanese AH-64E: 2.05 (30,353 Ground Kills / 14,828 Deaths)

  6. Indonesian AH-64E: 1.99 (93,653 Ground Kills / 47,143 Deaths)

  7. AH Mk.2 Apache: 1.99 (36,363 Ground Kills / 18,318 Deaths)

  8. AH-60: 1.03 (18,455 Ground Kills / 17,997 Deaths)

What I’m mainly confused is why the Dutch has a significantly better KD than the Taiwanese, Indonesian, and British (excluding the US as it’s a major nation) despite all of those platforms getting LDIRCM at the same time. We could just chalk it up to player skill but I don’t believe it’s simple as that.

What’s even interesting is the Mi-28NM despite being from the big 3, and being played the most compared to any other heli, it nearly the same KD as the Chinease and the Dutch.


I could easily point to this, say French mains is just better, thus explaining the higher KD. China could be having a lot of games with Russia and the rest are facing the pantsir more thus explaining a significantly lower KD.

I could be right but I also could be very well wrong, and we don’t know because of the way Stat Shark collects data. Only Gaijin probably knows with the their internal database.

It’s better to argue based on vehicle performance and experience because it’s up to you to interpret vehicle performance (use logical reasoning on why this vehicles good or bad), and you can correlate that with your experience (although stat peaking will be used to verify with the experience you have).

Okay so please tell me, how can the Mi28NM have a 155% winrate?
how can it win more than 100 percent of it’s games? lol if you said it’s had an increase in win rate of 155% then that would make sense as it’s a multiplication and an indication of how much it has improved.

However you did not say that, at all.

As well as this, for one who has “studied” more maths than I have, you seem to have a very, very loose grasp on how both statistics and percentages work.

What because I’ve not only disagreed but proved you wrong on more than one occassion or called out your nonsense?

lol

So you tell us to play 13.0 russia etc to say it always wins, yet you’re playing 10.7 USA when you have one vehicle.

I’ve went and checked your replays as well bud, learn to use the M1 KVT better and use a proper bloody lineup.

10.7 is not top tier

That does not show their overall win rate at that BR bracket at all, what you have right now is not a large enough pool to state they have X winrate.

For a start, germany has a staggering 37 percent winrate at 10.7, USA is above that.

USSR primarily due to the T80 buffs and the BMPT has / had a ridiculous winrate at that BR

Also you’ve got a 48% winrate in the damn M1KVT so you win nearly half your games

In my KVT I’ve got a 63 % win rate.
10.7 USA is great fun.

EDIT: Just went and watched the space port match again, you messed up about 5x against the 2S38 and BMD4M, you then procede to retreat in a ridiculous manner, then leave the team.

You wonder why you are losing? You are not playing lineups.