I’m just 1 man unfortunely
@G3ntl3man95 Tiger helicopters are so bad it pains me to even talk about them lol
1700 hours, tons of top tier games
3 games is nothing, go play 30 of them in a row against Russia and show me the results pls, no more talking
1 Like
But…but lmur…😢
Yeah this guy is trolling hard.
You didn’t count the VBCI + VBCI-2 + Jaguar + F16 + AH-64 I also use at top tier, independently from the others
Plus the terms and services of the game forbid you from playing it, you know that
Compare that to the 155% winrate of the mi-28nm
Oh I know it’s hopeless, but once I get curious about something I can’t stop.
2 Likes
Keep on going until 20-30…
You’ll see the 50% slowly going towards 70%…
It shouldn’t even be a 50% to begin with. that Red desert game was a throw of gigantic proportions and we should have won that one against Russia easy.
1 Like
Soviets are slightly better on Red Desert than NATO tanks.
Less reliance on mobility, and more reliance on front armor.
1 Like
The Russian players barely got to do anything that game, which is the worst part.
My team roflstomped the enemy team and was very eager to spawncamp said enemy team, completely ignoring 2 US players that were just shooting them in the back. By the time some of the aware players killed these 2 they spawned 64Es and rolled what remained of our team.
2 Likes
1700 hours? I’ve over 4 thousand mate.
What because i’ve thousands of hours and game across multiple nations ver near every nation in game, compared to your barely 2 nations past rank 7?
Barely 200 lol
I gotta love this now, the fact that more and more people are starting to get the Ah64Es and showing that they’re just as blatantly OP as the LMUR slinging MI28 is quite funny.
You’ve provided evidence that the MM isn’t sitting anywhere near the way Sad is making out yet he still insists on it being this way.
The JAG slinging Apaches are such a pain in the rear end at top tier, especially now that people are ysing them more and more
1 Like
That’s not how percentages work, it can’t have a win rate higher than 100 percent mate.
It can only win up to all of aka 100 percent of the games it plays, it can’t somehow have 155% winrate.
You don’t understand humor apparently.
Pretty sure I’ve studied more maths that you did during your whole life tbh. I’m gonna stop talking to you, you’re starting to annoy me ngl
Another great 10.7 GRB performance on NATO side (the only win was along with Russia).
Quite frankly I don’t even understand why people still play NATO anymore, at least at 10.7. It’s loss after loss after loss after loss after loss after loss.
1 Like
The premium Harrier was insanely op when it got released
1 Like
funny that you only mention tanks what about other things like cas and missiles huh? just stop man… playing usa cas with mavericks vs playing russians with 38mt and others xDDD dont tell me usa is good xD
1 Like
Aster has had this for ages. IRIS-T radar is similar.
24 10.7 GRB games played in a row (as the U.S.).
11 victories, among them :
- 6 victories against Russia ;
- 5 victories along with Russia.
So Russia got 13 + 5 = 18 victories out of 24 games => 18/24 = 75% winrate.
Always, ALWAYS, way more losses than wins for NATO. Something is wrong at top tier and needs to be fixed (spike/mmp missiles broken, BMPT op, t-series modeling broken, NATO IFV nerfed-to-the ground). That’s why NATO loose more than they win.
1 Like