What are you trying to prove with that tho? You could play 1000 games and youd still only have 0.00042% of the games that only the T80BVM played in January. Your statistics wouldnt even be a rounding error compared to the games played each month.
1 Like
1 vehicule, 1 cas gameplay. i see why now.
2min in cas. dies to maybe russian, leave the game 5min, wishes you team win without you and if they dont, bais fault.
it that how it is ?
2 Likes
I’m trying to prove that according to the law of large numbers, the more games you play the closer to the hypothetical real russian winrate you get.
Hundreds of games are played on my part and the russian winrate is still around 70-90%, so I’m deducting the real russian winrate is around 70-90%.
For the 134th time, my performance is equal to 1/16th of the overhaul team’s performance, each game.
I could leave without even spawning, it wouldn’t change anything.
exactly prooving my point…
Uhm ok but like i said even if you played 10,000 games then youd still only cover 0.0042% of the games of one vehicle. So its kinda impossible for one person to get a sample size big enough to challenge global stats
Like if you want big numbers its not going to get bigger than what we already know
No, it’s just proving 1/16th of the team is contributing to the loss at the end of the game lol
Not if you consider the daily number of games thus the daily rate
The numbers are way tinier
I do what I can on my scale
A lot of players would be better off not spawning for the team, some players goes 0-3/0-4 every matches, teams that doesn’t have them will likely win more.
Alright but for the 2,387,331 games the T80BVM had in January that would mean an average of 77,000 games per day.
Like i get what youre trying to do but youre not gonna get anywhere near a valid sample size with how big the game is.
1 Like
@SadRIPer defending his precious Russia with all his heart.
BTW I’ve barely touched Soviets this year.
Not interested in hard grinding, and losing 3 times in a row stops me from playing Soviets for at least a week anyway.
I have 9 other tech trees that are far more fun to play.
1 Like
The issue with using a high sample size (specifically in stat shark’s case) as evidence is that we don’t know what the sample size consists of. It’s not that I’m against statistics, it’s that we cannot come to a conclusion on how two vehicle interacts based on global statistics because there are so many factors that goes outside the scope of the conclusion.
For example, would it be wise to say that the IRIST is better than the Pantsir when it comes to taking out helicopters? Well according to Global stats, it has better KD than the Pantsir so in conclusion that would be yes, right? Of course not, LDIRCM directly affects IR missiles so that it doesn’t hit the target.
The same thing applies to when you compare the LDIRCM Heli vs the Pantsir using Global Statistics. It’s impossible to derive how good a vehicle is when it comes to taking out a certain type of target when all 4 types are combined into one (drone, heli, plane, munitions).
As far as my statement with the AFK, and stuff like that, it was to make a point that we can’t tell by how much the pantirs affected the 64E KD and vise versa. Though in hind sight, I definitely could’ve worded that differently.
What about italy? I’m looking at starting the grind for them again as It’s just italy and sweden to take to above 11.0.
The soviets I quite enjoy the T80UM2 and T80U at 11.7 but meh, it’s quite tedious the teams are absolutely useless.
That is true we can not analyse two vehicles against each other in a vacuum and i agree that the Pantsir definitely has a raison d’être at top tier due being the best SACLOS slinger but the other guy is correct. The Pantsir has so many games that if it was really good at killing LDIRCM helis then its stats would be better and LDIRCM Helis would perform worse at least the non russian ones.
1 Like
germany have 7 km range f&f missile so…
1 Like
How about i’ve just played 3 games back to bakc, and lost, funnily enough every single time to USA lol.
Sitting here chanting russian bias as if the big three aren’t babied af is just ridiculous.
I mean your monthly stats show you barely with a 47 percent win rate so it says a lot, coming barely halfway up the team each game lol
EDIT: Better than that, you’ve never used any other nation bar France and one US tank above rank seven. so what are you even on about russian bias etc, go use the damn tree properly and see how pitiful they are.
I knwo the arietes are right painful to use which is why I kinda gave it a pass once I got to the OF 40s and such
As far as i play against italy.
They kinda powerful, good mbt choice nice realod and of course lovely 2a7.
Cas wise its meh . Only having typhoon.
Sams ofc its good and if you enjoy light flanks tanks. Italy is for you
1 Like
Unarmored Leopard 2A5s pretty much.
1 Like
i see, so they’re pretty damn decent to use to be fair mate I quite enjoy the 2A5, however the Ariete is a bit shorter no? height wise
It was related to a whole thread, I didn’t read the most recent conversation. This thread is pretty sad as of late. From delusional ru mains bashing their head against just plain truth into delulu on delulu violence.
1 Like