Wait a second that’s genius.
Might do that myself.
This is projecting someone else’s argument onto me.
Cause:
1- Soviets have uptiered vehicles.
2- Soviets have poorly modeled vehicles.
3- Soviets have bug reports that have been undiscovered for years by tech mods.
Soviets have ALWAYS had less under-BR’d vehicles than USA, but you don’t see me or others claiming American bias, because bad balancing has nothing to do with bias.
Mig-29’s horrific thrust curve being reported, denied, and ignored is a real fact.
Mig-29’s dry thrust fuel consumption being over-zealous by ~4% is a very real bug report that has been undiscovered.
Bad things happen, it’s not unique to any tech tree.
And I’ve NEVER in my life ever read someone argue that any nation deserves to have poorly modeled systems.
So I really don’t get where DSRT is coming up with these ideas.
I’ve never shared my opinion on bug reports being undiscovered for years.
I’ve almost never shared my opinion on uptiered vehicles, and when I do it’s a cold take.
And the opinion I’ve shared on incorrect vehicles is the following: “Vehicles should be made as accurate as possible with available legal information.”
If you have to sweat for that than it’s mostly a player issue.
The Abrams (amd most US tanks) can already work amazingly if you have basic positioning knowledge and even a little bit of situational awareness and critical thinking.
5 Likes
They don’t realize that most posters here are also casual players, just that some of us have better common sense.
2 Likes
Yeah I always laugh when people accuse me of doing nothing but playing WT in my life, just because I’m decent at the game.
2 Likes
The Abrams easily beats most if not all of the T-series around their respective BRs lol.
1 Like
You also hadn’t researched any of the >9.3 br ru vehicles except for the recent event Arena, so how do you know they are better than the NATO’s counterpart?
@Necrons31467 another one, time to update the list when you are free lol “M1 is worse than the other tanks I hadn’t even touched.”
5 Likes
Literally takes argument out from context, builds strawman and says i have poor argument well my guy you have none.
Well no other nation than Germany has IR missile carrieer capable to completley counter LDIRCM helis so if LDIRCM get fixed how everyone gets balanced ? You are completley delulu here.
So called “context”:
Yikes man, if you can’t angle your helicopter to counter IRIST, that’s just pathetic. Like I get it, when there’s no real threat, you tend to get complacent and die to easy-to-counter threats. That doesn’t mean it applies to those who plays smartly with these helis
IRIST, CLAWS, BUK, other FnF spaa are completely useless against LDIRCM helis. Ask anyone who plays them and they will all tell you the same thing. You can bring out an outdated SACLOS spaa which will at least give you a fighting chance against these helis (if they’re braindead) but not against planes. It’s a lose-lose situation.
Since at this point, you seem to live in your own bubble, you do realize that 5 nations (off the top of my head) operate top tier IR slingers? Fixing LDIRCM would at least give these nations a fighting chance. Eventually we also need to model rotors so that ARH can also detect them.
Again, you can’t seem to grasp the importance of having a good SACLOS SPAA. The new pantsir system can not only take out an entire 16 launch salvo from an apache, it can take out helicopters and most likely take out planes.
No other spaa is capable of doing this. This create a huge imbalance where having Russia on your team will lead to full air superiority.
Huh ? You can’t even read the text i quoted up there ? You are illitirate.
So then what is the point “Fixing” LDIRCM here ? To disproove bias they must do something that completley usless and won’t do anything.
None of them can outrange FnF missiles or have good parabolic trajectory to negate cover.
Omg SPAA can take out Planes and Helicopters what a thrill.
Do what ? Shoot missile at visible target ? Every other SPAA at 12.7 can take out target even when they lost vision of it.
Because no other spaa is capable of countering LDIRCM helis effectively…
The IRIST doesn’t have a big enough parabola to be impactful for helicopters. It’s only noticeable for planes.
As for range, most have 10km+ which makes it good enough. Due to map sizes you will rarely see helis at that distance. They are usually under 10km.
It sure is when all other spaa can only take out one type of aircraft. Not a hard concept to grasp.
already explained
take out an entire 16 launch salvo from an apache, it can take out helicopters and most likely take out planes.
If you have trouble understanding these simple concepts, I highly encourage you to go play other nations and see how their spaa fight against LDIRCM helis. You probably won’t though so it’s no surprise there
Can you make any sense now ? You just said angling will counter missile after changes this is complete nonsense.
After the changes you will because other SPAA IR missiles like 9X can’t go farther than 12km.
Literally can’t hide behind the terrain to save himself from Pantsir.
man i love those threads
ragebait central hahahahaha
1 Like
His Arena stats are funny too.
2 Likes
I also though this would fix the Dircm/Lmur situation. Cause Iris-T based team defense won’t work vs. Russian teams. Since Ger getting massacred by Mi-28 and LMUR, I also switched back to SACLOS VT-1 missiles from Flarak Rad. Unfortnately these lack range. Mi-28 with LMUR usually spawn at the distant helipot to stay out of range.
Its evident that russian Saclos SAMs are the only ones able to counter DIRCM choppers. Sadly most used DIRCM heli is also a russian one…so Gajin’s decision is hard to grasp. Russia doesn’t need another Pantsir, while there ARE nations who suffer from the Mi-28 spam and can’t do anything.
Its so depressing:
Iris-T: Heli just sitting there while all your SAMs miss. Killing half the team with one LMUR volley (hard to intercept).
VT-1: Lacks range. Mi-28 just sitting there and spam LMURs.
Roland 3: Out of range.
Gepard: Out of range.
Stingers: Same as Iris-T, won’t hit DIRCM heli. Out of range as well.
Sidewinders: Dircm dazzles them as well.
Amraams: Helis are hovering or move just slowly. No doppler radar return (rotor blades would light it up irl, but ingame not modeled). Amraam usually misses as well.
Airborne guns: Work, but difficult to pull off. They usually hover high above the battlefield. Going for them with aircraft guns exposes you to BUK, Pantsir etc… Almost impossible.
So what to do? Quit every high tier match vs allmighty Russia? Cause they always spam Mi-28 vs. Ger teams. Even at match start with rockets. Cause they know there are no viable systems to counter them. Its unplayable.
I didn’t bring that up because we can excuse it is likely in stock form. Another strange thing is why he decided to stop playing such an overpowered vehicle, while he is perfectly OK with spading trash cans like M1 Abrams, maybe he is like my stepsister’s little brother who likes to challenge themselves doing more difficult things bro
NATO mains are a different breed indeed
2 Likes
Russian bias, it’s all done on purpose
I’ve got another 20ish games in a row with 76 something % of russian winrate to show
I literally just play games after games and show them, I’m not even cherrypicking them lmao
Bro throws games so Russia looses more, so gaijin will buff it even harder? I guess my man has problems with basic logic as well.
6 Likes
Some big brain move right there, none of us normies here could understand bro
5 Likes