Russian Bias in 2026?

You’re using your own experiences as facts, which definitely is far from optimal.
If Pantsir was such a menace, global stats would definitely show that it’s performing much better than average AA.

Do you think all those 64Es reached those stats by getting deleted by Pantsir before they could even fire a missile off ?

3 Likes

Here’s an idea… instead of blaming the Pantsir’s chronic average nature… how about you blame people for 1: Spawning CAS in the first place instead of more tanks. 2: People using CAS so incorrectly that they die to Pantsir.

The US since he hasn’t gotten the ADATS, CLAWS, or the 64E

I have them and will say US Top Tier is easily among the best in the game, just lagging behind in fixed-wing CAS.

Yea guys, RU mains out there you can pretty much wrap up your game.
You’re not evading the accusations with the pantsirgate 2.0.
They’ve done it and they’ve done it twice, using the same platform.
Assymetric balance my sporty and very symmetric ass.

If we take an entire lineup into account, Russia is stronger in top tier due to their CAS. Even simulator stats confirm that. Russia has averaged 70% winrate there since LMUR were added months ago, going up from a balanced ~50% winrate.

The Abrams is by far not the best, being outdone by the Leopards 2A7 and Merkava.

The Adats and Claws/NASAM are both mid asf compared to what you can find in other nations.

Their IFV are nonexistent, with the Stryker MGS being their good sniper light tank and the HSTVL being situational.

The AH-64E can be found in almost every nation now and is outdone by the Mi-28NM LMURs

And as you said, US air is straight up the worst of all nations in ground RB.

US ground top line-up has no redeeming, unique, quality in big 2026.

funniest thing the M1 KVT still doesn’t got it’s ERA, only a useless decoration

1 Like

ehh abrams got 5 sec reload at Ace and less than 6 at experts, while having one of the best shells with ERA on sides that could sometimes tank Kh missiles

New 12.7 Pantsir :

  • New 95Ya6M missiles ;
  • 96 missiles with ammo crates ;
  • 70km radar with no blindspot ;
  • Mach 5 missile ;
  • 75G max overload ;
  • 40km launch range ;
  • anti-drone mini missiles ;
  • 6 main missiles + 24 mini missiles (for drones and atgms/bombs) ;
  • 30mm guns ;
  • of course, no NATO equivalent.

“Russian bias doesn’t exist”

EDIT : Pantsir-S1 + BUK weren’t enough I suppose

2 Likes

At least the new Pantsir is 100% real this time. Id call that progress in the right direction.

Absolutely bro, once the pantsir 2.0 comes out then your winning rate will drop from 20% to 0%

4 Likes

Not really.
95Ya6M missile has some, questionable data.
Search radar coverage is also, questionable.

@H_ngma

NATO doesn’t have anything but garbage to counter, they’re not considered serious military forces ingame

With the current state of russian top tier additions, questionable data is at least any data

True but it’s not like nato has anything like that. Also I’m just happy that they didn’t pull anything out of their backside this time

70% russian winrate at 13.0 GRB, let’s make that 95% this time

Russia best, others = poo

Literally no point playing anything else than Russia/China at this moment.

They got what they wanted, Russia best

1 Like

I don’t mascaraed it as fact, I usually explain thoroughly on why I think the way I do. You are not doing that, instead you are relying statistics that is essentially a black box, we don’t know what makes it up.

The correct answer to that is we don’t know. You need to tell me if:

  1. the pantsir is on the ground
  2. it’s actively looking for air targets
  3. it’s trying to shoot down agms
  4. it’s trying to shoot down helicopters

There’s a reason why I heavily rely on experience and vehicle performance rather than global statistics

Where you seeing 70 percent bud xD

So what about IRIS T when ti released it shot up to a near 3.0KD overall and Still is the most overpowered SPAA in the game, the BUK absolutely sucks to the point where I even stopped grinding for it.

As well as that pantsir is not some OP death machine at all, It was better than NATO contempories but NATO nations literally haven’t designed much in the same way as pantsir as they rely more on air superiority than SPAA.

3 Likes

Stop coping, play 100 13.0 GRB games against Russia and show me the wins VS the losses. Let’s watch the winrate result.

“BUK sucks, Pantsir sucks”, everybody laugh at that statement sir

Another russian main who doesn’t want his lineups to be nerfed as NATO ones already are