Russian Bias in 2026?

Machinery of War Discussion
886

If you cry and leave after 1 death your 100 games are just as a joke.
And USA 10.7 is something what I like to play, they got nice lineup in there.
Biggest issue is people like you who call it a russian bias , and leaves just after they get 1 hitted , or they just got 1 tank on lineup and begone.

And your “russian” bias in 13.0 is only cas, but let us pretend rafale, and ef doesnt exists, and having Germany on top tier means having best AA on team from top tier.
And yes that same LDIRCM helo cancer is on every nation nowdays, not just mi28.

I want to see how many pantsirs I will face in 10.7 lineup.
Plot twist = None.
And before that pantsir is on game or even devs , i wouldnt start calling it out just yet, and lets see will they raise basic pantsirs br also, so it wouldnt be free aa anymore

887

I don’t want to see your vehicle winrates which can be played along with Russia, I want to see 100 games in a row against Russia.

And the wins VS looses. No more coping.

You won’t make anyone believe Russia has 40% winrate at 10.7. Stop spreading misinfirmation

888

Thats why winratesof a couple dozen games like Sadriper brings up doesnt say anything but millions of games averaged out over a month absolutely say something about the strenght of vehicles or lineups to be more precise

889

T-80BVM doesnt have commander IR. Who cares?

890

yes, as it has 35 xD

891

Me! I want proper top tier MBTs for USSR, im sick of playing garbage taks

892

Screenshot 2026-02-27 120008
?

893

Nope, it says nothing irrelevant of amount.
Not even KDR says anything notable, and that’s better than win rate.

Especially in realistic and simulator battles.

894

Yes, I want to see how often NATO forces win VS loose against 10.7 GRB Russia. Simple as that.

Your team looses => allies get demoralized and leave after 1 death / play in a bad way => Russia wins and have better performance than NATO. If your team winrate is bad every time => performances get bad.

You want to increase a nation’s perf, you increase its winrate. Hence, you balance Russia.

895

Yes it does. Claiming that stats from millions of games dont tell anything relevant is insane

896

You missed the context again. It was practical joke about counting the winrate over onself`s stats

897

I don’t want because some random man from internet ask me so spend 6+ hours on br that i consider super boring to play while i suggest 5 min solution that will bring absolutely the same result.

898

Well, I guess Statshark, college, and the science of statistics is insane to you then.
Statshark and Thunderskill both warn you not to use their data to argue about vehicles.

899

I literally have 10 13.0 french vehicles in the line up. Russia has 70-100% winrate at 13.0. I leave after all the vehicles have been used, what are you talking about.

Stop the cope, show the 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia and the wins/looses.

900

Players playing with that MBT should. Because it’s a precious asset.

But they just hold W and steamroll everyone because of the bias, so yes you’re right they don’t care.

As a matter of fact I don’t want them to get the IR vision on commander sight, because it will be a good excuse to move it down at 9.3.

901

So, BVM at 9.3 when?

902

Sure 35%, Russia is a very bad nation, I would even say 10% ngl.

The amount of coping in this post omg

903

No they are not, because they support what i say. Claiming that millions of games points offer no relevant data is complete insanity. That is literally how statistics works.

Citation needed. Also it doesnt matter what they say, if their data is sound then it can and should be used to compare vehicles.

904

well at least at 10.3-10.7 it is, having garbage tanks & basically single attacker

905

Look at NATO winrates, it’s all red it’s pathetic.