No it doesn’t, you can prevent any of those from shooting with one shot. You can’t to the same with the BMPT due to its horrendous damage model.
5 Likes
Describe: Jumbo. Hull-Down. Shot off your track already & is ready to hit your barrel. How would you stop it with one shot? Especially when with described situatuion, he can easilly deny you even a chance to shoot back at all.
Same question but with 2a7V, which is even harder.
1 Like
Lol please construct an even more hopeless situation next time.
Both can be barrreled or breeched in one shot, the BMPT cant which makes it a nightmare when hull down compared to other unmanned turret vehicles like the Tshrikon, Puma or AGS.
1 Like
…you answered for such situation with your stupidity:
Im not even gonna read further if you fail to read before answering
1 Like
You can still barrel it but a fair comparison is completely moot if your idiotic self constructs a borderline hopeless situation to begin with just to make your point.
Ofc you dont because once again you dont have an answer. In that specific situation it doesnt even remotely matter if youre in a 2A7V against a Tiger I or whatever stupid constructed fight you want to have, youre gonna get barrelled and die.
But in any other situation thats not constructed by some Bot the BMPT has insane advantages over any other vehicle hull down due to the sheer stupidity of its damage model.
wont let you sending a following shot. Or moving a little bit. Much can be made. Situation that the guy desrcibed is fatal for the tracked any other way, no matter how you look at it.
you again fail to even read, and im an idiot somehow. Situation was provided by the @dingloid , i only answered on his allegations. You creating your own situations to show how his situation can be solved is just much stupidity coming along.
which was not the case the man asked. Instead of “waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa but this situation isnt fair look how it works in other so your take about this situatuion is wrong”-ish cry you might have asked about your favourable situation. And the answer may or may not be different.
No shit sherlok. Thats why its underpowered weaponry sits at 11.3, much alike AGS being a huge menace with samely underpowered ammo at the same BR.
1 Like
dingloid just said youre tracked so smoking and retreating is not an option. Dont blame me for your inability to excuse the BMPTs stupid damage model so you have to actively add stuff to the situation so your point doesnt sound as stupid.
The fact remains that in ANY hull down situation the BMPT is impossible to be disabled in one shot compare to any other vehicle in game. You constructing a situation where any vehicle would fail against any vehicle is not a counterargument.
Also you didnt even answer his question, you immediately pivoted to making up your own situation.
i must be tripping then. Im not continuing that conversation if your bias loosens screws in your head
Made up. He never said that.
You very much did not. You claimed that you die in this situation which might be true however every other vehicle in the game give you the possibility to fight back with one shot, the BMPT hull down doesnt.
Yes it is, he asked what you can do against a hull down BMPT which is a fat nothing due to its biased to hell damage model.
There is no favourable situation. The BMPT will have advantages over any vehicle in any hull down situation.
Which can be disabled with one shot exactly what i am saying the entire time
We all know why you dont want to continue
Man, if I show a 80% russian winrate at 10.7, it means NATO looses in 80% of the games, and Russia wins in 80% of the games. No need to play Russia to prove, again, the statistics I got.
I just got 50 more games against 10.7 GRB Russia yesterday. Again, I got 78% winrate. I’ll post that later.
Btw, once again I’ll say it, it’s not about MY personnal performance. It’s about the overhaul performance of NATO vs Russia teams. NATO looses in 80% of the games.
I constantly showed +/- 80% winrate every 20 games in a row against Russia, and I’ll keep showing those. No inconsistence here.
No more being civil when my posts showing the bias get flagged and banned instantly.
No, it means YOU loose playing NATO in 80%, which also doesnt show if USSR was against you, or played a significant role in you loosing.
Well until you play russia and show that it supports your statistics, its hardly can be named a “statistics”.
1 Like
First, Russia has the bias at +12.0, especially 12.7/13.0 GRB. That’s a given, I’ve already proven that, you loose way more than you win at those BRs, especially because of their CAS.
Then, I don’t want to see these, I just want to see 100 10.7 GRB games played against Russia, and you show me how many wins VS looses you get.
150% you’ll get 70-90% looses against Russia as the U.S. Can’t have different numbers at this BR, I got 150 games this week, and that’s the trend I obtained.
10.7 GRB is even more broken than top top tier against Russia.
so broken, much strong
Again, I’ll say it again, in each of my thread, I say how many games I got, how many games I played against Russia AND along with Russia, and how many game I lost with AND without Russia.
So it logically and mathematically proves the rate of loosing against Russia.
Also, it’s not ME loosing against Russia 80% of the time, it’s 16 players (including me) each game (* +/- 300 games showed so far) loosing against Russia 80% of the time.
The role of Russia in ennemy team is always significant, as the ennemy team is always composed of 75% of russian vehicles, and the 25% leftover is composed of the rest of the ennemy nations.
Again, if you loose 80% of the time playing NATO, there is no need to play Russia to prove you loose 20% of the time playing Russia. It’s just stats wtf, no need to prove it both ways.
At 10.7 you primarly see Arenas, aka 11.0 russian tank which has APS and top tier dart.
Indeed, BROKEN.
But don’t take my word for it pal. Just play 100 games against 10.7 GRB Russia, and show me how many times your team wins. You gonna be surprised.
which only differ with that tank in top ammunition and aps. APS is useless as at 10.7 you use APFSDS, and top dart doesnt make a 10.7 tanks any more cardboard than 3BM42. Lol. Basically garbage tanks in any proper way rather than penetration.
Just play 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia man, and show me how many times your team wins.
I can say with assurance the winrate will be 0-30%.
Just bring a few names of USSR players with 80% winrate for last month on statshark. It should be super easy if your statement is true and will illustrate your point much better. Plus easy to check unlike your screenshots.
It’s not about the winrate of 1 particular individual, it’s about how many games your NATO teams lose VS win at 10.7/13.0 against Russia. As NATO forces, you loose 80% of the games. Just check it by yourself man, play 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia, and show me how many games your team won.
Showing the winrate of 1 particular individual has no sense as he can play different BRs as different nations… it has no sense at all.
To be clear, Russia is strong at low/mid tier, but not as OP as it is at top/top top tiers.