First, Russia has the bias at +12.0, especially 12.7/13.0 GRB. That’s a given, I’ve already proven that, you loose way more than you win at those BRs, especially because of their CAS.
Then, I don’t want to see these, I just want to see 100 10.7 GRB games played against Russia, and you show me how many wins VS looses you get.
150% you’ll get 70-90% looses against Russia as the U.S. Can’t have different numbers at this BR, I got 150 games this week, and that’s the trend I obtained.
10.7 GRB is even more broken than top top tier against Russia.
Again, I’ll say it again, in each of my thread, I say how many games I got, how many games I played against Russia AND along with Russia, and how many game I lost with AND without Russia.
So it logically and mathematically proves the rate of loosing against Russia.
Also, it’s not ME loosing against Russia 80% of the time, it’s 16 players (including me) each game (* +/- 300 games showed so far) loosing against Russia 80% of the time.
The role of Russia in ennemy team is always significant, as the ennemy team is always composed of 75% of russian vehicles, and the 25% leftover is composed of the rest of the ennemy nations.
Again, if you loose 80% of the time playing NATO, there is no need to play Russia to prove you loose 20% of the time playing Russia. It’s just stats wtf, no need to prove it both ways.
which only differ with that tank in top ammunition and aps. APS is useless as at 10.7 you use APFSDS, and top dart doesnt make a 10.7 tanks any more cardboard than 3BM42. Lol. Basically garbage tanks in any proper way rather than penetration.
Just bring a few names of USSR players with 80% winrate for last month on statshark. It should be super easy if your statement is true and will illustrate your point much better. Plus easy to check unlike your screenshots.
It’s not about the winrate of 1 particular individual, it’s about how many games your NATO teams lose VS win at 10.7/13.0 against Russia. As NATO forces, you loose 80% of the games. Just check it by yourself man, play 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia, and show me how many games your team won.
Showing the winrate of 1 particular individual has no sense as he can play different BRs as different nations… it has no sense at all.
To be clear, Russia is strong at low/mid tier, but not as OP as it is at top/top top tiers.
The more dogwater you are the more likely your team lost, I’ve met players with 0.3 KD and guess what, their vehicles winning rate are average lower than depth of hell, like hundred of match with 20-30% winning because they are mostly dead weight for the team, their influence only draining their own tickets more than the enemies, so everyone is different, there are also players here with 70% - 80% on their NATO’s vehicles which is also inline with their ru stats so what are you going to do with those numbers? Lol
The thing is, you showed battles and timestamps of those battles screamed most of games, you just left soon as you hit 1 death.
Now, you talk a lot of ussr bias especially in 12.7/13.0 , and yet you cry 10.7 games.
And if you want to talk about 10.7 USSR has worst cas on that BR.
Oh well…
If it won’t get a new missile, then mostly useless and it’s fine. If it will get a new missile, then better to test it on dev first, but in general they don’t need it now. The main victims will be helis, especially without FnF. Probably nothing will change for planes.
I don’t want to play on 10.7. I play only 13.0 when i solo. And I can’t understand why you can’t bring some statshark stat when it should be super easy if your statment is true. It is reliable source and easy to check. Or why I can’t use 100+ games of some random USSR player which should show the same thing as my 100+ games.
