69…
i feel like a unc.
No it’s our problem as well. If standards for implementation go out the window then we might as well be playing a completely different game.
Not really considering Smins statements where Iterations don’t matter and the exact aircraft type needs to be stated.
Exactly. That’s why all other things in the game are added on positive proof rather than proving the negative.
Not reall considering Gaijins standard for weapons is usually ”needs to have been tested“
i agree.
Precisely.
Mr Wrong Manual Man would probably have a fit and be the first to come onto the forums screaming blue-murder if we started giving British aircraft AMRAAMs to 1990s RAF/FAA types, US aircraft AIM-9Xs on earlier model F-15/6s and so on.
Сonstant uptiers to 8.0+, unplayable. At it’s BR it is no doubt strong, but it mainly fights in uptiers.
i dont care, if they can use it. no problemo.
N011R was strictly for the Su-30SM, India was offered the Su-30SM2 and IDRW stated that the list of “unified” modifications that made it align with the Su-35S included the N035 replacing the Bars-R.
Almost all RWRs lack 360dg vertical detection, it’s more of a game limitation than a nerfing factor. Things like ALR-69A and L-150 can only distinguish the direction of an RWR contact within +/-30dg elevation, though beyond that it can still detect an emitter similar to the way SPO-15 does.
how can they carry a missile that doesnt exist? besides the kh38 hasnt be shown to be used on su30sm at all.
1 Like
The missile does indeed exist and has been used in combat.
Dude the Kh 38 missile has been marketed and it is based on buyer preferance and mission integration SU 30 SM2 and SU 35 are both capable to do so. They are of identical time period built almost at the same time period and similar technology available, it is not like comparing a 1980s plane to 2010s plane. Both are built at different plants (Irkuts and Konsomolsk) and there are differnces between the two but both carry similar ground ordinance one of them being the KH-38 missile, the descussion we can talk about is the gudiance system of the missile and its fnf capabilities to which we dont have info of as gamers, unless we are part of the UAC development/production team.
Now if other aircarft need ordinance added due to being in the same era, company model, type etc and there is a very highly likelyhood of it carrying those ordinance and compatability then the devs can add those ordinance to that specific plane/vehicle.
Yes that is a problem that I have noticed, but by a slight downtier or same tier and on a lot of maps its an easy win.
Of course but has the 38MT ever existed as a functional weapon tho?
Yes.
Complete conjecture.
Literally doesn’t matter.
Citation needed.
So instead of actual proof we just just use guesswork now?
Not guess work I am not suggesting that, it must be based on research. How can I prove and how can you disprove the KH-38MT missile without reasonable doubt, are you an ordinance expert, am I? If we are not then we can go on and on until next year on this topic.
I wholeheartedly agree.
Well you could prove it the same way every other weapon in the game gets proven. And I can’t, because you can’t prove that something doesn’t exist.
We have this topic for over a year and so far no one has been able to provide conclusive proof that the thing exists.
1 Like
I agree with your statements, but didnt Gunjob provide a picture of an SU34 with the KH38MT on either side over a year ago? I certainly cant provide conclusive evidance and still need to research the KH-38 launchers in game, enjoy the lower tiers so far.
There is one picture from a brochure floating around which might show 38MTs but they might also just be mockups.
And again, that’s an Su34 not an SU30SM.
No one seem to can which is the entire problem about that thing.
We are stuck in a bit of limbo with it, but that is a top tier issue.
is there a br range in the ground where soviet tanks arent overtiered and dogshit anymore. Feels like its all cas or nothing and 1 op spaa in top tier
The biggest problem for me is not missiles there are plenty of cas and anti aircarft missiles to get ride of the 38 slingers. It is these maps and infact 90% that do not fit top tier absolute sloppy environment and map creation that simply does not reflect top tier, these devs for more than 5 years are producing in your face channled and funnled game play that nobody likes at top tier which is the sole reason of why so many people are not performing at top tier and in fact why so many vehicles become usless. Devs that simply refuse to accept that their model of game play within 500m2 squared is not top tier and should not exist. Its either in your face channeling or wide open maps that exist in this game, only a few such as Vietnam, Red desert, fulda, Tunisia extended version, to an extent Domination Test site and the new map fit top tier game play.
They have such a good baseline with their Nuclear Thunder whatever it’s called mode.
Im sure you could implement ground gameplay, heli gameplay, maybe even naval.
Even artillery could be played as artillery.
They just need to think it out, which i doubt they will.
1 Like