Bro for real??? Congrats dude!! First one or nah?
Edit. Answered my own questioned by resding further.
Seriously, congrats dude. Got 4 over here, hyped for your fam.
1 Like
Quote of the freaking year
I just try to bring it up at least once in every casual conversation to help raising some world wide awareness for the issue. It gets a bit complicated when talking to elderly people, or my mom and dad because if they dont simply agree and act like they know, you have to start from 0. Really annoying. But everyone loves me for it (i think). Hasnt influenced my social life in any negative way. Can only recommend. For the greater good, raise awareness for russian bias by letting your bus driver, work colleague and your grandparents know about it. Whether they want to or not. They will get to know what russian bias truly is.
At least thats how i handle it.
/s for the people that are new to conversations
1 Like
honestly the biggest way this game is biased towards russian tanks is the map selection, you are always forced into cqc maps that only benefit russian tanks with their strong frontal plates (especially the bmpt and its whack damage model)
Cuz the gamemodes are bad for them, I guess.
For some reason you don’t need low profile or constant time reload, but you need negative barrel elevation and reverse speed.
In an escalation-like mode, T-series could show their abilities, i guess. When the engagement distance is 3km, I guess lower profile matters. As well as when there are hundreds of AI and Player targets, having a constant autoloader reload without the “first row ammunition” that needs to be replenished after use, is actually useful?
And reverse speed is not, when you don’t need to sniff corners
umm, bmpt detonates when its atms are hit. For some reason. As if instead of solid fuel they had tnt.
After playing 4.7 russia again after a while and shrugging off a hit from a dicker max in a T-34…
cmon man theres got to be funky stuff happening. the T-34 having such a wonky damage model for such a long time feels intentional at this point
CQC is actually better for NATO MBTs
Faster reload, better reverse and often better traverse rates.
Not to mention neutral steering
Taller profile also helps with shooting/spotting over and through obstacles like walls and containers.
NORMALLY, he wouldn’t die, but his turret is completely disabled.
Meaning he can’t do sh*t to me.
*Cough, ignore my aim on the first shot
1 Like
That is a good idea I would love for it to happen, we need to think about new maps and incorporate ground in nuclear thunder and change the way ground rb works. We need to expand the player base.
Unrelated to maps, it’s harder to hit the weak points of Russian tanks at long range, making armor more effective. The main Russian bias lies in the much untrue crazy missiles
A who never had to play on Imaginot Line 5 times in a row is speaking.
statistically you are more likely to get a cqc map in general, i can actually get kills on maginot line because theres actually hills and i can conceal my pathetic lfp, the oplot (a worse t80, the leopard 2a7, the swedish tanks, heck even the japanese mbts are better suited for cqc in different ways)
the missiles which the bmpt has 4 of
its the single picture that has ever been found, and its not even kh38mt(its mte) and that same brochure proves the seeker ingame is made up