You can’t be speaking about illiterate when you can’t use basic punctuation. Half the time, I have trouble reading whatever you’re saying.
Going back to the main topic, unless they fix LDIRCM and implement accurate guidance systems, then this really is a clear bias.
Even more so if they give the new pantsir the mini missiles.
terminal butthurt
It’s one sentence not an essay.
Cope harder.
It’s always funny seeing Russian mains defend their precious overpowered CAS platforms. When they have no argument, they resort to stuff like this.
also guess what nations tend to have these at top tier…
You now have 1)Free pantsir 2)Cheap pantsir 3) Airfield chaser 4)Otomatic (premium) and another SACLOS that why you would even use honestly?
Being ru main and is like being spoon fed and cry about your gums bleeding because you bite the spoon so often. While, of course, pretending that they’re bleeding because those ruthless nato mains punched the chewing hell out of your mouth.
I know this isn’t a direct response to your argument, but I have a question
What does one do in, for example, the MSC, when met with the following scenario:
You’re up against a BMPT (2002) which has it’s LFP concealed by terrain, has already shot out your tracks, and is now going for your gun or attempting to penetrate your frontal armour.
Well what i can say here you literally coping making your own universe of nonsense
May i firstly ask the counter question, and then answer yours?
What does one do to RaketenJagdPanzer, RaketenAutomat, 2a7V, or any other tank within the same scenario (of course with the different tanks to fit the .3 BR diffrerence rule)?
Answer is: one gets destroyed. And thats totally legit frag. One let itself be caught by BMPT so it gets destroyed.
Same happends with 2a7V same hull-down. Same happends with ATGM launchers like Wiesel 1a2.
Same happends with Tiger 1 meeting Jumbo.
And there’s no problem with it. Same happends with most of the enemies one meets in their best position and if he lets them have the first shot.
No it doesn’t, you can prevent any of those from shooting with one shot. You can’t to the same with the BMPT due to its horrendous damage model.
Describe: Jumbo. Hull-Down. Shot off your track already & is ready to hit your barrel. How would you stop it with one shot? Especially when with described situatuion, he can easilly deny you even a chance to shoot back at all.
Same question but with 2a7V, which is even harder.
Lol please construct an even more hopeless situation next time.
Both can be barrreled or breeched in one shot, the BMPT cant which makes it a nightmare when hull down compared to other unmanned turret vehicles like the Tshrikon, Puma or AGS.
…you answered for such situation with your stupidity:
You can still barrel it but a fair comparison is completely moot if your idiotic self constructs a borderline hopeless situation to begin with just to make your point.
Ofc you dont because once again you dont have an answer. In that specific situation it doesnt even remotely matter if youre in a 2A7V against a Tiger I or whatever stupid constructed fight you want to have, youre gonna get barrelled and die.
But in any other situation thats not constructed by some Bot the BMPT has insane advantages over any other vehicle hull down due to the sheer stupidity of its damage model.
wont let you sending a following shot. Or moving a little bit. Much can be made. Situation that the guy desrcibed is fatal for the tracked any other way, no matter how you look at it.
you again fail to even read, and im an idiot somehow. Situation was provided by the @dingloid , i only answered on his allegations. You creating your own situations to show how his situation can be solved is just much stupidity coming along.
which was not the case the man asked. Instead of “waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa but this situation isnt fair look how it works in other so your take about this situatuion is wrong”-ish cry you might have asked about your favourable situation. And the answer may or may not be different.
No shit sherlok. Thats why its underpowered weaponry sits at 11.3, much alike AGS being a huge menace with samely underpowered ammo at the same BR.
dingloid just said youre tracked so smoking and retreating is not an option. Dont blame me for your inability to excuse the BMPTs stupid damage model so you have to actively add stuff to the situation so your point doesnt sound as stupid.
The fact remains that in ANY hull down situation the BMPT is impossible to be disabled in one shot compare to any other vehicle in game. You constructing a situation where any vehicle would fail against any vehicle is not a counterargument.
Also you didnt even answer his question, you immediately pivoted to making up your own situation.
i must be tripping then. Im not continuing that conversation if your bias loosens screws in your head
Made up. He never said that.
You very much did not. You claimed that you die in this situation which might be true however every other vehicle in the game give you the possibility to fight back with one shot, the BMPT hull down doesnt.
Yes it is, he asked what you can do against a hull down BMPT which is a fat nothing due to its biased to hell damage model.
There is no favourable situation. The BMPT will have advantages over any vehicle in any hull down situation.
Which can be disabled with one shot exactly what i am saying the entire time
We all know why you dont want to continue
Man, if I show a 80% russian winrate at 10.7, it means NATO looses in 80% of the games, and Russia wins in 80% of the games. No need to play Russia to prove, again, the statistics I got.
I just got 50 more games against 10.7 GRB Russia yesterday. Again, I got 78% winrate. I’ll post that later.
Btw, once again I’ll say it, it’s not about MY personnal performance. It’s about the overhaul performance of NATO vs Russia teams. NATO looses in 80% of the games.
I constantly showed +/- 80% winrate every 20 games in a row against Russia, and I’ll keep showing those. No inconsistence here.
No more being civil when my posts showing the bias get flagged and banned instantly.
