iirc he didn’t believe that Fox-1s could be retargeted with DL until a bug reporting manager explained it to him.
His belief was based on a developer’s statement about how datalink works for Fox-3s btw
2 Likes
Ah yes the premium SU30s ground RB placement. The only thing more egregious than its Air RB placement lol
1 Like
tornado at the same br as Su-30MKK is so intelligent
Almost as intelligent as putting the Su-27SM with the worse CAS loadout at a higher br
1 Like
yeah his takes are really quite interesting… dont say too much though you might get flagged lmao. Thats one of his favorite moves…
Oh no, how scawwy…
He did that stuff a good couple times lol
1 Like
At least it has Kh-29s but yeah the Su-30 is egregious and should have gone up 2 updates ago.
1 Like
Well its refreshing to know you dont condone his takes or his system of argumentation because im not gonna lie, and i almost feel bad saying this, but i thought you two and a couple others were like pals… dont take that the wrong way. But I definitely can respect your POV a lot more now. So thank you!
1 Like
I focus on the game’s balance more than realism, and try to stay fair regarding this.
Alvis is uh, yeah idk
4 Likes
Well thats really appreciated, for real. I try to aswell but man when people conduct thesmselves like that… its hard to keep my bearing sometimes. only just found out i could block his posts lmao so thank god.
1 Like
glad to hear!
I forget how long it has been out for, yeah that is crazy
@MiGoon_Fox-3 's views represent my views on this matter.
My take right here: Except balance & realism aren’t contrary things.
I’m glad @ElectedElit21372 appreciates my views when said by other people.
@ElectedElit21372
Your post claimed damage models were Russian, which they aren’t.
If damage models weren’t standardized, vehicles would be significantly more expensive to produce for War Thunder.
I’ve never seen one post of yours say NATO has good or better equipment than the Soviets.
Your post falsely claims you defend NATO, yet where are your posts praising NATO equipment?
There is zero favoritism toward Soviet equipment in War Thunder.
USA’s stock rounds are better than Soviet’s best rounds, Soviets have never once had a top tank better than America’s since Abrams got added.
Japan literally has Soviet CAS; & USA, Israel, & France have CAS equivalents.
All LDIRCM helicopters are over-performing compared to their real life counterparts.
So yeah, while you claim MiGoon, myself, and H_ngma are all wrong without evidence…
Doesn’t matter what position you take - if Razer Alvis Whatever he’s called this week is agreeing with you - you’re really, truly, most definitely stuffed!
@Crazed_Otter
Beeschurger, MiGoon, etc represent my views on most matters.
@MiGoon_Fox-3
You are misrepresenting my beliefs about Fox-1s.
I spoke on Fox-3 datalink.
I worded my posts badly & it made it look like I was talking about Fox 1s when I wasn’t.
It’s funny how Elected respects my takes 100% because they come from you. XD
the arguments you use are the issue.
the examples you use and the way you word them are what make people not particularly like your takes.
I am very certain I clarified I was speaking about Fox-1 datalink.
I remember specifying that.
Either way continuing this discussion is kinda pointless since it happened over half a year ago
I rush things for certain.
I forget to specify things, I especially forget to soften my approach… cause ultimately I hate it when others are upset, absolutely devastating to me when another person gets upset.
So yeah…
Ever going learning process.
You did, I forgot to specify in my own replies to you and I apologize for my mistakes in that regard.
I however was trying a nuanced discussion between Fox-3 & Fox-1, and ended up re-looking at my old arguments seeing how easily it was to read my own posts as talking about one when I was talking about the other.
So I apologize for my error.
We all learn stuff every day
1 Like