I mean is that really surprising considering some of the additions we got in recent times and the state of balance for these additions?
Ok Ivan :
Number of likes of top post DEFENDING Russia (gnn gnn Russia weak need buff Russia gnnn) :
→
VS
Number of like of top posts SAYING RUSSIA IS GIVEN UNFAIR ADVANTAGES IN RUSSIA THUNDER :
→
→ 
→
→ 
→ 
BONUS : Number of players PLUMMETING (back in numbers from 1 year ago) since players have understood devs had no intention to give NATO good stuff and ONLY INTEND TO UNFAIRLY FAVORIZE RUSSIA :
Do you understand than beside 5-6 bots in this thread on the Kremlin’s payroll, everybody consider Gaijin gives unfair advantages to Russia, some even thinking there are political reasons behind that ?
You’re a joke man, you and your comparse. There is not a single place on the Internet where people say Russia suffers, Russia is weak, and Russia is unfairly nerfed, EXCEPT :
- Here from the same 5-6 russian bots ;
- probably the russian forum
THAT’S IT. Everybody else is RATIONAL, everybody else sees the BIAS IS BLATANT.
I can post this non stop.
No one is defending Russia on the Internet, saying their vehicles are weak/blatantly nerfed on purpose/that Russia suffers.
No player express that, no content creator express that neither (except of course, when they’re russian).
It’s the total opposit : the comments are always this way : “NATO is always nerfed”, “Abrams get 0 buff but russian MBTs do”, “Modules are present in NATO MBTs but none in Abrams”, “Russian premiums are the only ones good” (non exhaustive list).
REMEMBER : LMURs vs JAGMs/PARS/Spikes, no hull buff on SEP V3, modules everywhere on NATO MBTs vs NOWHERE on russian MBTs, turret baskets for NATO, Spikes/MMPs don’t hit anything, Relikt buff, russian side armor/ERAs/autoloaders eat darts, TOW-2Bs don’t do any damage, Mi-28nm’s cannon way more accurate than others, BMPT’s cannon accuracy “”“nerfed”“” (same result), Trophy = BAD vs Arena = GOOD (why does Arena can stop multiple projectiles at the same time while Trophy can’t ? Maybe to make Abrams die from BMPT, just a random thought :) ), KH-38s, bushmaster’s accuracy, NATO MBTs armors, Pantsir 1 and 2 vs the other NATO SPAAs (non exhaustive list)
Russia Thunder gives unfair advantages to Russia and artificially/shadow nerf NATO, you won’t make me silent on this! Everybody can see there is a clear favoritism for Russia!
EDIT: not sure about that, but I noticed Russia now has ALSO the best anti-radiation missiles ?
WHO COULD HAVE THOUGHT ?
Thats it. Hes gone crazy. Nothing can save him now.
5 Likes
Don’t forget :
You and your 5-6 comparse are the only ones on this planet to defend ingame Russia and say they suffer/they’re weak/they’re nerfed too much.
Live with it, your opinion and your mates’ doesn’t mater, the large majority of the playerbase knows the truth, and quits the game in consequence, and it makes me very happy.
Maybe when Gaijin will see the playerbase plummets like crazy and thus the money as well , they’ll start considering the players giving them euros and USD, and not roubles.
:-)
- likes doesn’t mean it’s being defended
- if you actually paid attention to that channel you’d realise what people are defending it and what people aren’t.
But you’re too brainrotted to actually look anywhere past surface values
2 Likes
on this planet huh?
Interesting.
nice typo btw
Game needs competition that’s definitely true.
1 Like
Tic-tac, the more you give every single advantage to Russia the more people leave and play something else
Pretty soon you’re gonna end up with 30 russians vs 30 russians in game in total, don’t crawl back and cry when this happens
You’ll have spent hundreds of euros for nothing. So please, I beg you, keep unfairly advantaging Russia. :)
aand now we’re flagging posts
They already listen to those players, because they continue to released OP premiums. Do you really think Russians of all people are responsible for the majority of purchases on WT?
Did it not get a hull buff or was I hallucinating?
Autoloader:
Me when I lie:
(it was heavily nerfed and you’d have to be blind and ignorant to not see that)
Try to broaden your horizons and not hyper focus on 12.0+ GRB, as it is not representative of the actual game.
I’d atleast expect people to not freak out and scream bias whenever a Russian vehicle is unique/good in some way.
2 Likes
Ad populum again. Have you considered that majority of people who are fine with current game state dont bother coming to forum and dont spam “no need to nerf bmpt”, “there is no russian bias in ba sing se” threads? Hence why there is such difference.
If you ever wiped out russian bias from your eyes, you would notice that player count drops in june/july and recovers each year. Also as you can see, game is getting more and more players over years.
Majority of this thread messages is from 5 kremlin bots and 5 pentagon bots. Others just hop in and hop out.
Even if thats the case Im afraid you arent part of that “everybody”. Rational person can read graph and make some proper conclusion from that. Without desperately grasping for anything that could fit their agenda.
Ad populum again. Have you considered that majority of people who are fine with current game state dont bother coming to forum and dont spam “no need to nerf bmpt”, “there is no russian bias in ba sing se” threads? Hence why there is such difference.
I suggest you reading comments on socials / videos / ingame instead of camping on the russian bias thread all day long, and you’ll see everybody thinks there is a russian bias at top tier GRB (because it’s the truth).
If you ever wiped out russian bias from your eyes, you would notice that player count drops in june/july and recovers each year . Also as you can see, game is getting more and more players over years.
I also suggests you to study statistics and probabilities and learn what a trend is.
Plot twist : the trend is not very good for War Thunder for the past months/years, Ivan.
People stopped buying the fairness of this game. They understand if you don’t play 1 particular nation you don’t win.
Rational person can read graph and make some proper conclusion from that.
Rational people also know what a variance and standard-deviation are. Can you apply those on the graph please, then tell me how’s the War Thunder trend ?
Or too much to ask
bold statement. Can you prove it?
he just showed you the trend, I suggest you do that instead.
1 Like
Mental Hospital in 2026 thread
2 Likes
bold statement. Can you prove it?
I already told you : your 5-6 bots’ opinion doesn’t mater : the very large majority of the playerbase thinks the way I do. I’m just the messenger, I hope you understand your endless defence for Russia on this thread has absolutely no positive consequence for ingame Russia in people’s mind on the outside world.
People largely think there is a balance problem in this game concerning Russia.
he just showed you the trend, I suggest you do that instead.
Apparently you don’t know what a trend nor a return is, so I suggest you restudy your statistics courses and learn that
Like they asked, can you prove it?
I don’t care about proving you anything, buy yourself some glasses and figure it out by yourself lol.
So you’re here to cause drama and not provide anything actually meaningful to the conversation
1 Like
Well people would be freaking out a lot less if the reason why theyre good wasnt completely made up boons every single time for a year or so.
1 Like
Close engagements benefit NATO tanks more than Soviet tanks due to close engagements requiring tanks show side armor in assaults.
I’ve yet to see evidence that LMURs have a limitation beyond software version.
On top of that, a limitation of 4 LMURs would just reduce the BR of Mi-28NM.
SadRIPer overtly shilling for Russia… Wasn’t on my bingo card.
Those are opposite statements.
MiGoon has not defended Russia in this entire topic… you however… did.