we’re also not stopping you from criticizing anything.
That’s all you buddy
?
That “nerf” was when they gave the M1A1 the exact same armour that the M1A2 SEP V3 has, which clearly shouldn’t be the case
imagine tiger 2P with tiger 2H armour performance and damage model
we all know how completely whack gaijin’s changes to the abrams were on release.
The tusk modification thing switching M829A2 to M829 is also still happening on the SEP V1 which I discovered the hard way yesterday
your right
the SEPv3 should have more armor
because wtf were they even doing with that like really 50mm increase despite the fact that they were able to make the same volume have ~550mm KE protection in the late 80s early 90s with an armor package that didnt weigh anywhere near what gaijin is implying
Second time i’ve watched that video and second time I checked discord, thank you
When your argument falls apart so bad you have to retreat to the classic “kremlin agent” after not even 2 actual attempts to respond properly
1 Like
Please do it faster. Same things could be said about A-6TRAM but since its not Russian tech tree that is not an issue.
The SEP v3(or more generally top tier US teams) are doing really good right now. While the SEP v3 has problems like underperforming hull armor or the hull fuel tanks being 9mm instead of 25mm, it’s an absolute hulldown menace and is very worth playing.
2 Likes
It’s the update effect, everybody plays it
The SEP V3 is no better than the V2, it’s the exact copy-paste, but maybe a little bit heavier (cool)
Oh and, the more armored turret, which is completely useless as the v2’s turret didnt get pen by russian darts anyway, lol
Don’t try to reasonate rationaly with War Thunder, they only advantage Russia, everytime, for God knows the reason
forgot about this, enjoy
1 Like
You’re the only one on this planet, beside some of your comparse here, to defend Russia and actually say they suffer.
95% of the playerbase see the blatant bias. It’s seen everywhere.
BMPT has a <15% chance to blow up after destroying it’s ammo btw, but you’re not at 1 approximation anyway
Anyway, you understand it’s 5 Kremlin’s bots saying Russia suffers vs everyone else (can even see the hundreds of likes in the first post of every thread I posted in the pictures), so I guess you’re gonna argue alone from now on, lol.
Sad future WT has
It has almost no roof junk so you can better peek ridge without being seen. It also has the updated turret ring which is great against BMPT. Furthermore, the turret side have also been improved meaning that you can now wiggle the turret like a Leopard without risking a sabot going through the flat cheek or turret side.
That’s actually not true. On top of wiggling ability and not being killed so easily from side turret, the mantlet weakspot is much smaller than on previous Abrams to the point of being probably super obnoxious to hit for enemies. Also, M829A3 is a damn railgun against 80% of Russian tanks you face.(Premium/Event T-80U, T-72B3). T-90M are strangely enough quite rare.
2 Likes
@SadRIPer Here, did this quick. It’s a really rough drawing but it’s about correct. This is the turret against 3BM60 at 500m. Top is new SEP v2, bottom is SEP v3:
Green is to represent shots that will actually enter the crew compartment, not just breech/barrel you. As you can see, turret overlap on the SEP v3 is much better.
1 Like
did I say they suffer?
Stop putting words into my mouth.
I was asking about the “lack of wiring” stuff, but get that is assumption
At this point I become convinced russian bias is name of bacteria emptying nato players skulls.
I did successful -4 flank, suppressed their anti air for me and some f15, even bombed “indestructable hull down monster” and some other unlucky guy, shot down chinesium dorito, earned nuke. And they had only one job - kill that gripen so I can safely deliver nuke. Ofc nobody spawned spaa and f15 was doing anything but trying to kill thing pinging me and him with its radar.
2 Likes
A) That is a number you made up. Prove it with stats. Besides that, you are using ad populum fallacy.
B) Majority of playerbase struggles with at least getting 1 kill/spawn
C) Which sometimes leads to them labeling things not as their issue but as bias, rigged game etc.
3 Likes
Yes, bias exists! And the community has proof.
1 Like
I’d wager that 95% of the playerbase is not particularly intelligent or unbiased either. It’s genuinely impossible to have any discussion without bias overtaking a discussion on balance at this point.