Explanation changes nothing.
My man, half of the Japanese TT is of dubious nature.
Export 64Es shouldn’t even have LDIRCM.
Top tier tanks getting ammo they never owned or fired.
Things are being held back because others need to compete.
Yes it does. It might not for you since you apparently only care about gameplay but as soon as you care about anything else in that game it absolutely matters.
It’s called technical compatibility and while you might not like it it’s normal in this game.
Yeah and now let’s do some quick thinking if we can find a tech tree that doesn’t get held back artificially but rather buffed artificially all the time.
We’re playing a game, don’t forget that.
You mean it’s yet another excuse to add fake things.
Adding export 64Es with LDIRCM is literally an artificial buff to make them stronger.
There is a difference.
A prototype is lesser on the scale than trialed vehicles, because trialed vehicles are above prototypes in the line of production.
1- Service.
2- Mass production.
3- Trial.
4- Serial production.
5- Functional prototype.
6- Incomplete prototype.
7- Mockup.
8- Blueprint.
I’m not sure how to respond to that so
We’re playing war thunder not just any game.
They aren’t fake. They need direct proof that they are compatible, usable and relevant on the specific vehicle. It’s something entirely different to a fake agm or fake ammo belts. And most importantly, it’s a consistent rule.
Definitely not the case.
Prototype US vehicle has been funded and developed by the US and as such is a property of US.
Sweden trialing T-80U for an hour or two definitely doesn’t come even close to that.
I knew you wouldn’t get it, so this feels pointless.
Still just an ordinary game.
They’re fake as those countries don’t operate 64Es with LDIRCM.
I thought vehicles of all nations should be represented in a realistic manner.
Yes, it’s absolutely insane seeing a community of so called realism-hunters being fine with systematic rules that break realism. But yeah, if it’s a “rule” then it surely can’t be totally fake and illogical.
It’s really easy to handwave fakes when it doesn’t positively affect the one nation you don’t like.
Not with the way vehicles are added to the game. There are rules and standards that other games don’t have.
No you just don’t understand what fake is. A vehicle getting equipment that’s proven that it can be used is not fake. It follows the general trajectory of Gaijin making vehicles their best possible version independent of procurement, budget and maintenance.
A Dutch 64E with LDIRCM and JAGMs is just the best version of itself with equipment that it can use. Just like a T80U with Thermals.
A BMPT with a separated ammo belt is not the best version of itself since the belt literally doesn’t exist that way. And the same applies to a MI28NM with 8 LMURs and a LDIRCM that can affect missiles anywhere besides the bottom back of the heli. Same with the other stuff above.
It’s 2 completely different things and once again the first one is consistent for everyone, the latter is only there to make russian shitboxes competitive.
1 Like
Every post serves as proof that Russian bias truly exists
That’s ironic.
I do, them being wrapped in a carefully planned “rule” doesn’t change anything.
So it follows the general trajectory of giving artificial buffs to nations and their vehicles, good to know.
Wait, Dutch 64Es shouldn’t have JAGMs as well ?
How so?
It follows the general rule that vehicle get into the game in their best possible state according to proof of technical compatibility. Not that every vehicle can just get completely made up bs that partially defies physics like russian stuff does. If you can’t see a difference between these 2 things then I can’t help you.
Pretty sure they put in a foreign military sales request but they aren’t in service yet.
M6A1 had a bug fixed in one day.
RD-33 engine historical reports never get acted on.
These stories aren’t exclusive to one tech tree, all tech trees experience every story ever said.
These have nothing to do with the actual existence of Russia bias . The reason for this difference can only be that the latter lacks sufficient data.
The latter has GDR unclassified data on Mig-29 9.12.
It’s a primary source and widely distributed.
F-4J can have its radar be PD instead of PDV due to a bug, the bug report on it has been ignored.
Using bug reports as “evidence” only disproves Russian bias, because all tech trees have and do experience the same things in that subject.
Yes, so I did not use the bug report as evidence of Russian bias.The evidence of Russian bias lies in their exceptional game performance, as well as their increased number and strength of equipment.
skill issues in 2026?
2 Likes
And what about the stuff that other tech trees dont experience?
if people think Russian bais is real they need to press uninstall - USA main
also u guys have been going at this since the beginning of the year 😭