an armour kit vs a different tank.
early 2000s. but m829a4 is going straight through relikt if russia can afford more of it
everything that the TES adds is also just an armor kit, but gaijin has implemented as a different tank
Ah and we have M829A4 ingame?
if we do use the TES it still has worse protection than relikt and makes the tank even slower compared to the T72
no but why would that change anything? were not talking about ingame
yes. entered service over 20 years ago.
This also differs per player. Waaay back (2014 iirc, damn time flies) I started as a US main and thus one of those APHE crutch players, yet I perform considerably better now than most of the British mains I see on this forum.
ok youve been playing 12 years. youre probably going to outmatch most no matter
i cant read cyrilic
either way. the US is using the M829A4 now, which will also flat out ignore russian ERA, because it was made specifically to do so
“ive been playing the game for 12 years and im better than average players which must mean there terrible”
1 Like
‘M929A2 and M829A3’
Neither can I properly, get a translator
It’s just some vague claims and a picture, it’s not substantial and certainly not real evidence of anything.
2 Likes
dudes been playing since i was 12 and wonders why most players are worse
It’s from NII Stali’s website, the company that produces Relikt
My UK progress currently at 10.7, not planning to go any further at the moment because the vehicles doesn’t interests me one bit. So far I have had some games in the challenger 3 and KD currently sitting at 3.0. Recently I played the Leopard 1A5 at 12.7, probably over 10 matches and went 2:1 and it’s a 9.3 so the odds of me getting 2:1 with challengers at top tier are good. My next tech tree is probably Japan once I order the Fuji or the gooner type 90.
i didnt need to read it to know that. Most russian “sources” about their military are as farcical as that one image that claims the Arjun MBT can penetrate 800mm of RHA
Whatever makes you sleep at night ig
i checked your statshark and you havent played the challenger 3 at all…? and if you mean the challenger 1 mk3 you might find the challenger 2s are much worse than challenger 1s for there br
It’s marketing from a Russian arms company. It should be taken with a grain of salt without significant corroborating evidence.