well sure :D If have to choose between lada or VW i will pay more for VW :) guess why…
i love how russians and people loving russia are so eager to lie to them self…
Nice shilling for Russian equipment, here’s reality.
Spalling, ERA are on all tech trees.
Autoloader is inferior to Abrams, Merkava, and Ariete reloading.
R-27ER means nothing. It was a minor powercreep in response to AIM-7F/M/P being vastly superior to AIM-7E-2s, Super 530Ds, etc at the time. People are quick to forget that only Japan, China, and USA had long-range BVR options at the time. Germany and USSR were shafted.
LMUR & JAGM are in most tech trees.
Many tech trees have ERA, and ERA has never been OP.
CAS has been OP among many tech trees.
Kamovs stopped being OP over 3 years ago.
IL-28 doesn’t have CCIP to use S-24s accurately.
IS-4, IS-6, Mig-17, ZSU-57, IL-28, Tunguska, S1, Shturm, and Object 292 have never been OP.
PT-76-57 & BMPT are mistakes similar to EBR, Puma, and allegedly R3 T20 at minimum.
You even claim everyone you’ve responded to [Non-Russians and people that love NATO] are all honest against your posts.
Edit added some context.
1 Like
Poor example.
I don’t ‘love’ any nation except my own. If you call dismissing propagandic claims, and laying out the facts ‘lies’, then perhaps you’re the problem
1 Like
Its not about belief, its about facts, yes, and the facts state that the West overpays.
1 Like
Russian facts :)
1 Like
I didn’t know that the Russians made it so that the USAF had to pay 90k for a bag of bolts…
1 Like
since you have no clue about aviation or any relevant information about that bag of bolts of yours all i have to do is “believe” in russian propaganda :) which is lame and i wont buy it :) or maybe you think 90K rubles… well thats not rly a lot of money you know?
Is this Russian Propaganda to you?
1 Like
do you have a better one?
Yes, I do.
compare the KA-52 and the Apache, for example.
1 Like
So you think its reasonable for anyone to pay 90k for
???
You don’t have a clue how arms manufacturers aim to maximise profit.
and you have no clue how aviation industry and to which standards they work or how big contracts for military which set of spare parts is part of works. No one ordered Sack of bushings for 90k dollars, it was part of huge procurement worth of several millions and some one just picked one thing from it and divided the whole cost by single thing on the list… this nonsense was completely debunked and you just need 3 minutes to find it out.
lol.
Show me another nation that has access to the LMUR’ im waiting.
You mean other nation’s ERA that underperforms severely compare to Russian ones? Lmao even.
2 Likes
Your example are helicopters that are essentially almost half a century old designs? And what exactly am i supposed to see? That coaxial rotors are cool?
Uh, if we’re comparing design age then thats not what I’m referring to. I’m refering to the fact that the KA-52 is cheaper than the Apache for similar performance (+ ejection seats!!)
on russian propaganda leaflet maybe :)
on russian propaganda leaflet maybe :)
I read the article you sent, and the high costs were due to… other companies literally artificially raising the price of the final product.
Source?
What exactly is ‘russian propaganda’ about my statement? You’ve got to be trolling at this point.
lol, lmao even
1 Like
Best example of Russian Bias:
There just didn’t got any reason to play others TT