I don’t think I need to explain.?
M1s are more than fine in game.
Incorrect. Winrate is only part of the skill picture.
If 2 players have a similar winrate but vastly different K/Ds, the player with the higher K/D likely contributes more to that winrate by having to carry negative K/D players.
1 Like
No, you do
Because claiming that winrate correlates with skill (Or is a major factor) is almost a TIGER_TANK_1 level take
If you want to compare skill levels, KS is the main factor people look at
4 Likes
Don’t make excuses everything that had been added is on list of voting you simply didn’t read description because you too much antagonized against Soviet tech tree and smallest wiff of nerf made you completley sefl sabotage whole MBT lines.
There’ll be new types of modules, ranging from electronic modules for air defense vehicles, machine gun ammunition, electrical equipment, as well as detailing and correcting guidance modules such as the drives.
2 Likes
you mean kd?
No, KS is more important than KD
Since KS actually looks at how many kills you get every time you spawn in.
1 Like
oh ok
Weve been over this. Detailing and correcting of guidance modules is the exact opposite of mashing together completely independent modules and thats not even covering the part where they completely spare autoloader carousels from their explanations why destroying baskets or rotating floors like the challengers blocks turret drives.
Well hitting metal sheet in autoloader won’t stop it from working but here we are and people whos fault this comedy is won’t even acknowledge it.
Pure cope.
It’s a module, so doing enough damage to destroy it will prevent it from working, what are you talking about?
Not in the slightest. Detailing and correcting is not the same as mashing together and making stuff less realistic.
Quite visible double standarts.
No you just coping literally saying “I imagined it differently” and that differently was nerfing only Soviet vehicles.
Uhm where exactly? The autoloader is there to load shells so if it’s broken it can’t load shells. The turret basket and even less so the rotating floor aren’t there to turn the turret.
No you just don’t understand voting which, given your apparent attitude towards democracy, is not a surprise.
Do you have any problems with your reading comprehension skills? I’m saying that most people don’t carefully consider the degree of structural refinement. At that time, my vote was (No)
What gives me attitude against democracy is people who can’t read description nor the argument.
Thing was T-series autoloader is overmoduled some uncritical parts are actually part of the damage model.
People did read the description and the thread. The problem was not what they wrote there but all the stuff that Gaijin precisely didn’t tell us beforehand. And the second more egregious part of the carousel being exempt from the reasons for turret drive blockage is not even part of the vote, its just Gaijin double standard.
You saying that devs werent clear what how it will be realised and showing how it was realised in 2023 with light vehicles both statements contradict each other.
What it has to do with voting ? Like literally you makeing no valuable point here only personal attack.
I mean, players don’t know how to implement it, right? Players don’t know how far the developers will go, right?
There’ll be new types of modules, ranging from electronic modules for air defense vehicles, machine gun ammunition, electrical equipment, as well as detailing and correcting guidance modules such as the drives.
Were missing electical equipment and machine gun ammo.
Again all over the “I imagined it differently”.