Quite visible double standarts.
No you just coping literally saying “I imagined it differently” and that differently was nerfing only Soviet vehicles.
Uhm where exactly? The autoloader is there to load shells so if it’s broken it can’t load shells. The turret basket and even less so the rotating floor aren’t there to turn the turret.
No you just don’t understand voting which, given your apparent attitude towards democracy, is not a surprise.
Do you have any problems with your reading comprehension skills? I’m saying that most people don’t carefully consider the degree of structural refinement. At that time, my vote was (No)
What gives me attitude against democracy is people who can’t read description nor the argument.
Thing was T-series autoloader is overmoduled some uncritical parts are actually part of the damage model.
People did read the description and the thread. The problem was not what they wrote there but all the stuff that Gaijin precisely didn’t tell us beforehand. And the second more egregious part of the carousel being exempt from the reasons for turret drive blockage is not even part of the vote, its just Gaijin double standard.
You saying that devs werent clear what how it will be realised and showing how it was realised in 2023 with light vehicles both statements contradict each other.
What it has to do with voting ? Like literally you makeing no valuable point here only personal attack.
I mean, players don’t know how to implement it, right? Players don’t know how far the developers will go, right?
There’ll be new types of modules, ranging from electronic modules for air defense vehicles, machine gun ammunition, electrical equipment, as well as detailing and correcting guidance modules such as the drives.
Were missing electical equipment and machine gun ammo.
Again all over the “I imagined it differently”.
The attackers are still distorting the facts
What do all these you mentioned have to do with the voting, anyway?
The person who practices double standards is you
Yes because it’s illogical to assume that they’d do the opposite of what they said and then double down with a good sprinkle of double standards.
In any case, your reading ability is commensurate with your situation
@Whisloy Moreover, is it reasonable to bring up the issue of Russian bias in 2026 to the level of a political matter?
Distorting what ? You literally showed in screenshot how it was implemented in 2023 on a light tank.
Am i arguing with AI or something ?
So you literally imagined stuff and blaming devs for it.
Go away AI.
Taking the devs literal and not assuming that they’d do the opposite of what they said is common sense not imagination.
lmao you really should enjoy your feudal country.
Where is this most successful?
Let’s say you have four outcomes, and everyone votes. The one that gets 30 percent of the votes wins. So, the minority wins, but the majority (70%) won’t be happy. Therefore, it’s logical that they demand a higher percentage of voters.