Go away AI.
Taking the devs literal and not assuming that they’d do the opposite of what they said is common sense not imagination.
lmao you really should enjoy your feudal country.
Where is this most successful?
Let’s say you have four outcomes, and everyone votes. The one that gets 30 percent of the votes wins. So, the minority wins, but the majority (70%) won’t be happy. Therefore, it’s logical that they demand a higher percentage of voters.
Like I said, GDP, Happiness, quality of life, living standards, HDI, pretty much everywhere.
That is generally not how majority voting works.
Also what’s the better alternative? A (historically not so) benevolent dictator?
Guys can we please go back to crying about Russian tanks
1 Like
No this is important. We’re discussing whether the current implementation of baskets is the communities fault due to the vote we had on internal modules but to properly discuss that we have to educate the less fortunate inhabitants of our planet about what voting is and how it works.
Then do it through PMs
Nah the information should be accessible to anyone willing to learn.
Also I think it’s kinda important for everyone to see what kind of people we’re dealing with here.
Wrong.
Gaijin own the game. Gaijin develop the game. They ultimately call the shots and decide what course of action they take. Plenty of cases on record where clear player preference has been overruled by them.
Blaming players is a cop-out. It would be like blaming Sheep for a Farmer’s dubious financial decisions.
2 Likes
Yes it is. Adopting democracy is the difference between long term stability and prosperity and becoming a failed state.
But you live in capitalism, not a democracy. Can an ordinary person without money lead a government? No, they can’t, and everyone knows it. The rich win, and elections are the easiest place to spend money.
You are ruled by capital. Just like it did 100 years ago through colonies and slavery.
1 Like
If win rate was not about team skill, then USA would have the highest win rate from 2019 to present, 2nd to none.
Even when Germany got the 3rd best top end lineup for ground, they had better win rates.
Sweden having the 2nd best.
So there is no evidence that lineup availability correlates with win rate when USA has the best lineup for 7 years now.
So it is interesting to see someones’ post [likely unintentionally] argue so highly of TIGER_TANK.
USA is about to get even more Abrams powercreep despite already having the best lineup; & you know what will happen to the win rate?
Nothing if skilled players don’t take advantage of the new M829A3 & Abrams.
I live in both. One is a economical system and the other is a form of government. They both have flaws of course but the combination is the best we currently and historically have.
I already have, Statshark disproves their statements entirely.
So I’m unsure why they cited a webstie that proves without a doubt that win rate has nothing to do with lineup power.
Show me where Statshark has USA as the #1 winning tech tree for all months, then the evidence is there.
That just + 4mm penetrating power…and -100 speed