Sure could but the utter dominance of democracies in all of those topics should paint a very clear picture that there is a correlation. Especially considering that you dont have a single point why democracy would be “crap” besides your utterly ridiculous example about the internal module vote.
buddy you and I have the same negative stats for the SEPV2
is this bait
Me:

You:


what comes around goes around
I see
First, Gaijin did not indicate to players how far they would take the structural refinement. Second, the first structurally refined tank was added to the game in the summer of 2023.
This vote is misleading and riddled with opacity.
Even with fixed armor you’ll likrly get clapped in it.
If you cab’t go positive in the current Abrams, especially the 12.0 ones, you are just not a good player at all.

ME

you
We both are not above the 50% Win rate
But lets stop with the comparing skill again
Oh I can show you something worse, but I’m warning you that you might lose some faith in this playerbase.
I grabbed this screenshot from a player in my current (soon to be previous) squadron, after I heard he was talking mad smack in one of the VCs.
Ah yes, winrate = skill
I already have lost complete faith
That’s impressive
Here’s a goober I found once (This was before the AESA euro was added, so during prime rafale era)
Average “M1s are shit” players.
oh yeah thats pretty bad, but saying I suck also doesn’t look good on your playerbase aswell.
Correct
In game yes, irl no
How does winrate = skill.
Explain




