Russian Bias in 2026?

Sure could but the utter dominance of democracies in all of those topics should paint a very clear picture that there is a correlation. Especially considering that you dont have a single point why democracy would be “crap” besides your utterly ridiculous example about the internal module vote.

buddy you and I have the same negative stats for the SEPV2

is this bait

Me:
image

You:
image

G974aM

2 Likes

what comes around goes around

I see

First, Gaijin did not indicate to players how far they would take the structural refinement. Second, the first structurally refined tank was added to the game in the summer of 2023.


This vote is misleading and riddled with opacity.

2 Likes

Even with fixed armor you’ll likrly get clapped in it.

If you cab’t go positive in the current Abrams, especially the 12.0 ones, you are just not a good player at all.

1 Like

Screenshot 2026-06-18 105926
ME

Screenshot 2026-06-18 105955
you

We both are not above the 50% Win rate

Stat shark says otherwise
Screenshot 2026-06-18 110200


But atlease you acknowledged that Abrams has inaccurate armor.

But lets stop with the comparing skill again

Oh I can show you something worse, but I’m warning you that you might lose some faith in this playerbase.

I grabbed this screenshot from a player in my current (soon to be previous) squadron, after I heard he was talking mad smack in one of the VCs.

Be warned though

1 Like

Ah yes, winrate = skill

I already have lost complete faith

1 Like

That’s impressive


Here’s a goober I found once (This was before the AESA euro was added, so during prime rafale era)

1 Like

Average “M1s are shit” players.

2 Likes

oh yeah thats pretty bad, but saying I suck also doesn’t look good on your playerbase aswell.

Correct

In game yes, irl no

How does winrate = skill.

Explain