Thunderskill was never a good stat site.
Of course you can’t see it, because you struggle playing them.
2 Likes
He’s negative in the SEP V2
how
2 Likes
i think a 95ya6, but its hard to tell, the way it behaved it looked like one however
All that can have other explanations not to only voting procedure.
imagine being against democracy in the big 2026.
the damn turret ring is about all the M1 has wrng with it bar the LFP.
The M1A2 has a trunion and what not modelled meaning it’s less likely to spall through and kill the crew.
The breach on the M1A2s etc have better protection due to spall soaking trunnions @H_ngma I’m sure mentioned it a few weeks ago.
Same as the 2A5? you can pen it easily with literally any 10.7 never mind 12.3
it’s marginally better armour does not make up for the list of other advantages the M1A2 has
2 Likes
Or maybe it has horrid/inaccurate armor ?
How people see one (non-Russian) tank with a single downside:
How people see Russian tanks despite their significant downsides:
5 Likes
Sure could but the utter dominance of democracies in all of those topics should paint a very clear picture that there is a correlation. Especially considering that you dont have a single point why democracy would be “crap” besides your utterly ridiculous example about the internal module vote.
buddy you and I have the same negative stats for the SEPV2
is this bait
Me:
You:
2 Likes
what comes around goes around
I see
First, Gaijin did not indicate to players how far they would take the structural refinement. Second, the first structurally refined tank was added to the game in the summer of 2023.
This vote is misleading and riddled with opacity.
2 Likes
Even with fixed armor you’ll likrly get clapped in it.
If you cab’t go positive in the current Abrams, especially the 12.0 ones, you are just not a good player at all.
1 Like
ME
you
We both are not above the 50% Win rate
But lets stop with the comparing skill again