Russian Bias in 2026?

I got one for china, it’s so damn fun man xD I do prefer my Netz but the Su30 is objectively better, at the same BR.
37 air kills in GRB with it as well as the ground kill xD

Definitely agree man, it’s also why I make sure to bring both 1 CAP and 1 CAS plane, if the russian teams are swarming with planes, I’ll spawn CAP.
Hence why I’ve 37 kills in GRB with a Su30 lol, funnily enough as china I find myself fighting russia a lot more now, than maybe a year or 2 ago.

ever seen 4 of em? xd it’s total madness how they can take a team from being kerb stomped to no one left on the opposing team

Just less to gain from them when you’re more skilled.

Lol what? they’re objectively better than the 2A5. better turret armour, trunion, same or better hull armour as the 2A5 armour on the hull is just as bad as the Abrams.
Better reload by a whole second, as well as higher pen.

only advantage the 2A5 has is gen 2 CITV: M1A2 has gen 1 CITV thermals.
Also the Leopard has the safetly feature for the engine deck which is stupid that only they got it.

4 Likes

Oh is this your plan to prove me wrong ? Annoy me to death with this ?

Oh no, the 2a5 has DM53! worse than M829A2, worse reload, same otpics, same gen 1 thermals for gunners, worse turret armour, same pathetic hull armour, BUT BUT BUT 2A5 gets Gen 2 CITV while M1A2 has Gen 1

I know right, and 2A5 has better armor overall too???

I’m planning on selling my BI coupon to get it eventually (hopefully it goes up in price soon)

I despise LDIRCM helis


The fact two PREMIUMS are in the top-3 vehicles for KS at 12.0 says a lot about the abrams
@MR_BOOMBASTICc

This is the statshark performance from last month, easy to double check

2 Likes

It doesn’t have better armour overall.
It’s breach weakpoint is weaker.
It’s turret armour is worse than the M1a2 as the M1A2 turret is near impenetrable.
It’s hull armour is also just as “bad” as the M1a2, it’s effectively the same as the 2A4 hull.

worse reload, worse round, same thermals, roughly same optics, worse mobility.
so how is it better?

1 Like

Lol. Lmao even.

Ah yes a vote in a video game where the devs were lying and intransparent is the ultimate proof that the most successful form of government in human history is crap. Truly one of the takes of all time.

4 Likes

oh you got one ofthem??!

I just love them as free RP for my planes, dazzle this 30mm cannon.

Shows that they’re extremely strong MBTs, the fact that the M1A1 CB has a better KD than the TT M1A2 is wild af.
higher win rate as well as nearly 4x as many games.
the anime abrams even better.

meanwhile. 2a5 is negative. 2A6 is barely negative.
The 2PSO negative, 2PL even worse. Only the 2A7V is positive and has only a 0.20 KD better than the damn premium M1A1 HC xD

1 Like

image
Yes, indeed I did

2 Likes

This is why I always laugh when people say premium vehicles have awful stats because premium players are new and thus trash at the game.

1 Like

You jammy, jammy man, i never bothered with the thin xd biggest regret

I’ve found a lot of prem players are re-roll accounts.
So they do better than before, it’s how there’s also a lot of people with extremely good KD, and low matches played.

What missile is that

Premium vehicles TEND to have worse stats than tt equivalents or their peers.

The issue is that it’s not always the case and does not reflect a vehicle’s capabilities

1 Like

By what evidence

What do you mean by re-roll accounts ?

No, premium vehicles tend to have extremely similar stats to their TT copies.

They create a new account, buy something like 2 premium abrams and a premium F18. using USA as an example. Then go and grind the new account so their stats aren’t brought downby their original account of which they learned on.

I did it on WoT, original account is like 0.7KD and a 45 percent winrate, neew one 1.4 KD and 70 percent win rate.

I’ve always thought they’d be slightly worse due to new players buying them

They never used to, at least years ago, there were vehicles which you could definitely discern were used by worse players. Oppose to now