It doesn’t have better armour overall.
It’s breach weakpoint is weaker.
It’s turret armour is worse than the M1a2 as the M1A2 turret is near impenetrable.
It’s hull armour is also just as “bad” as the M1a2, it’s effectively the same as the 2A4 hull.
worse reload, worse round, same thermals, roughly same optics, worse mobility.
so how is it better?
Ah yes a vote in a video game where the devs were lying and intransparent is the ultimate proof that the most successful form of government in human history is crap. Truly one of the takes of all time.
I just love them as free RP for my planes, dazzle this 30mm cannon.
Shows that they’re extremely strong MBTs, the fact that the M1A1 CB has a better KD than the TT M1A2 is wild af.
higher win rate as well as nearly 4x as many games.
the anime abrams even better.
meanwhile. 2a5 is negative. 2A6 is barely negative.
The 2PSO negative, 2PL even worse. Only the 2A7V is positive and has only a 0.20 KD better than the damn premium M1A1 HC xD
I’ve found a lot of prem players are re-roll accounts.
So they do better than before, it’s how there’s also a lot of people with extremely good KD, and low matches played.
They create a new account, buy something like 2 premium abrams and a premium F18. using USA as an example. Then go and grind the new account so their stats aren’t brought downby their original account of which they learned on.
I did it on WoT, original account is like 0.7KD and a 45 percent winrate, neew one 1.4 KD and 70 percent win rate.
There is also the perception of unbalanced equipment that can trigger people and make them leave out of frustration.
T-90M is a perfect example of this. It’s an incredibly mid tank, but for example casual player James with his 0.5 K/D and non existent aim will struggle against it’s one strength. Thus the struggle creates an perception of unbalanced equipment.