Ayaaooooo this
1 Like
Most maps in the game do indeed favor T-series tanks, but said maps are locked to 7.7 & below or voted down by the playerbase.
@H_ngma
Having false-accusations in your post in reply to my post that only speaks about Statshark data is not helpful to discussion.
Margin of error is like something percent.
July: 56.7%.
August: 56%.
September: 54%
October: 52%
November: 52%
December: 53%
Jan: 53%
Feb: 51%
March: 50%
April: 46.5%
May: 47%
Statshark shows a downward trend once Japan got parity CAS with Soviets averaging 3 points less than the previous 5 months, let alone 6. With January’s win rate being only higher than November & October, but lower than all other months, let alone after January as more & more people get the AH-64E & Su-30MKM [which people need to grind 3 jets to get].
Stats & Statshark are true no matter how much you deny both.
Win rate ALWAYS follows teams that play better: Spawning primarily MBTs & using them well.
There’s a reason Soviet win rates dropped like a rock once Su-25SM3 was added, & only recovered as Soviet players spawned less CAS than their opponents while performing better.
Everyone knows Abrams, Leopard 2A5+, & Strv 122 are the best MBTs in the game, everyone.
Except for the fact that 80% of this poll disagrees with you to the tune of 1000s of players. You are the minority by a long shot. Sure seems like your the only one that thinks this.
I don’t care that Russia’s fans disagree with me.
The fact your post insinuates most of the playerbase are Russian equipment shills is hilarious.
Edit:
The forum is a tiny, tiny population compared to 2 minutes of War Thunder matches starting.
1 Like
He is right, and 1000’s of trash players disagreeing doesn’t make it wrong.
4 Likes
Can you stop with your signature move of putting words into peoples mouths so you can act like theyre the unreasonable one? Its really getting tiring.
You claimed that Japans winrates show no positive difference after the Su30MKMs addition which is evidently just a wrong statement. Why you included all the other months with a plethora of different additions and changes is completely mysterious to me.
That is true but none of these changed or got new versions added in the timeframe were looking at so why would they have a huge impact on winrates if they stayed the same the entire time?
For everything else im just going to refer you to the very good writeup Migoon did here. Russian Bias in 2026? - #6007 by MiGoon_Fox-3
More intentional misunderstanding from Alvis Wisla attempting to completely reframe what i even said so that he can confuse and attack an argument i didnt even make
4 Likes
If 1 million people say 1 + 1 = 3, but 1 says 1 + 1 = 2, who is right?
1 Like
READ WHAT I SAID:
I did not say that russian fan boys disgree with you, in fact they likely agree with you more than anything because YOU ARE ONE OF THEM.
My post DOES NOT insinuate at all that most of the player base is russian shills. IF you actually read it and understood it for wha ti ACTUALLY SAID. I said that most of this poll and the playerbase at HEART DISAGREES WITH YOU BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT RUSSIAN SHILLS… and YOU ARE.
Is english your second language or something???
this is what you do, you misunderstand people who make real arguments against you and completely derail actual conversation EVERY TIME
@ElectedElit21372
I shill only for NATO & America, & am shilling for NATO vehicles today exclusively shilling for Abrams & Leopard 2s.
So stop accusing America & NATO of being Russian, they aren’t.
The only Soviet vehicle I’ve shilled for in the last year is BMPT when I proved it needed to be moved up by at least 1.0 BRs from 10.3 to at least 11.3, with 11.7 being plausible.
Russian fanboys have never agreed with me on anything except the BMPT because I’ve never shilled for their equipment.
The fact you think English isn’t taught in American schools is wild…
Stop trying to derail the topic away from War Thunder.
Talk about the game, not me.
1 Like
BRO YOU JUST SAID THAT ABRAMS AND NATO ARE THE BEST TANKS when they are not… That is you actively shilling for russia by pretneding they are worse than nato when they are not. The playerbase all agrees that russia is overperforming right now… and you pretneding that NATO is the best is just not even true. And by that logic you are shilling for russia by saying they (russia) are underperforming. When they are not
You heard it here guys, Abrams & NATO tanks are Russian.
If you’re going to get mad at me for shilling for Abrams & Leopard 2s, get mad at that.
Stop insinuating that they’re Russian.
You are quoted BTW, with your typos preserved.
If that’s not what you meant, change your wording.
They are though. Armor isn’t meta when you sacrifice in every category for it.
2 Likes
again thats not waht i said, your trying to misunderstand me on purpose
Depends on how you look at it. Shilling for Russia could also be claiming that their tanks are the best ever made, similar to how some US mains can view their aircraft.
Either way, disagreeing on which tank is better in game does not mean someone loves a certain country.
4 Likes
they are tho
abrams has second best round in the game with excellent ammo storage and reload
giving it the best firepower in the game (only anti-ERA dart next update too regardless of how it performs against relikt), great mobility and gun handling as well as armour that does well enough.
Turret ring is getting buffed or fixed next update, side armour is being improved.
Sure, it has spall liners and is getting new modules next update, but keep in mind that those new modules can act as spall liners and offer an incredibly minor repair (8s).
leopard 2A7s and equiv have excellent armour, spall liners as well as the best top tier round in the game (not including 292 apfsds for this) with solid mobility and decent enough reload.
blowout panels also are a benefit.
Challengers, yeah not so good. Leclercs also not so good, worse abrams that’s really it.
There are no other NATO MBTs iirc.
7 Likes
clearly you dont understand process of elimination. By saying NATO and AMERICA are the best you are disregarding the obvious overperformance of russian mbts, cas, spaa, and almost everything russia has in general.
how you dont understand this is baffling to me, but instead you wanna pretned like im saying “oh yeah the abrams and leopard 2 are russian” like what??? thats obviously not what im saying
Yeah… I think I accidentally insinuated this on some of my bad wording, for which I apologize for.
oh their the best? so thats why their being buffed in exactly the ways the community has been complaining about for years? if they are soo good why are they changing them??? ever thought about that? maybe its because the communities frustration with the abrams being dogwater ARE VALID…
Notice how the T90 M isnt being changed 1 bit?? hmm its almost like its because their already super strong and nobody is really complaining about them
I think if you learned how to play tanks you would think otherwise. Come back when you are more experienced and then maybe you’ll get it.
2 Likes