im not even gonna acknowledge this obvious ragebait
People will call anything ragebait nowadays. Just the latest buzzword really.
2 Likes
Or maybe people can’t handle a vehicle with a skill floor.
That’s why the abrams “suffers”
It has a relatively high skill floor and skill ceiling because you have to actually use your brain somewhat to make full use of its capabilites.
Meanwhile Russian T-series have lower skill floors and skill ceilings
don’t need as much brainpower to do ok in them but also don’t offer as much in terms of capabilities.
@ElectedElit21372 A similar example could be something like the F-2A ADTW vs F-14B
F-14B has the lower skill floor cause “Muh AIM-54 spam” lizard roleplay allowing for idiots to do “well”
While F-2A ADTW requires a little more brainpower to do well while offering much better capabilities once you know how to play the game.
the F-2 here is basically just like the abrams, while the F-14 plays the role of the T-series
7 Likes
you know what your doing dude, you arent clever
1 Like
Do you know what YOU’RE doing when you play the Abrams?
3 Likes
I shill for Abrams & Leopard 2.
Shilling, praising, defending are rather synonymous with each other, not synonyms, but synonymous.
Which means I am attacking the capabilities of T-90M, the only heavily armored MBT in the Soviet tech tree; & T-80BVM, the only averagely mobile tank of the Soviet tech tree.
Both fire rounds equivalent to L27/OFL F1… with M829A1 being a superior round.
Due to how MBTs in War Thunder over-perform in agility, War Thunder has a mobility meta at top ranks ground.
This makes Abrams & Leopard 2A5+ rather strong having top-10 mobility needed for close range flanking & engagements as well as medium range bonuses, the best MBT rounds in the game [except Strv 122s], good armor [slightly better than T-90M in the case of Strv 122], & a number of other important factors that aid in other maps such as Tunisia or Mozdok.
T-90M cannot be “buffed”, it has everything it can ever have added already added. It’s been at its limit since it was introduced firing a median round with poor mobility, & having to rely on patience & armor which isn’t something you should be relying on at top ranks.
2 Likes
Evidence of awful shots skill issue prooven.
1 Like
Also gun depression, which is hugely important for any maps with SOME hills (which most of them will have)
Great ad populum bro. If the 80% consist of purely dogwater players then their votes hold little to no value. Example if you are a 0 and you multiply by 10000 of your kind then it’s still going to be 0. The only differences it makes is the shit stack a lot higher bro.
1 Like
your right bro everyone else in this thread except you and your 4 little friends is a bad player bro… that definitely makes sense
ur right dude, anyone who plays america is just bad and all russian players are good. everyone that voted in the poll at the top of this thread is clearly just a bad player, but youre the exception for sure…
i cant fathom how you think that you can activiely just wave away an entire poll of 1000s of players disagreeing with you by saying “well their just all bad players across the board”.
if their all just bad players than why is gaijin fixing the abrams in the exact way this very community has been complaining about for years. clearly something about it isnt matching up with russia in terms of fairness
The guy just sucks at the game, but has too much of an ego to accept that.
I mean just look at his stats. Bro needs to tryhard to get a 1.0 K/D in his Leclercs, he is that garbage.
6 Likes
This discussion has gone off topic. The topic should be whether there’s a bias in 2026, not the balancing of the various nations’ stats. Also, anyone who thinks US or German units are worse than Russian ones is shooting themselves in the foot. Their stats are all higher; you should change your approach. Not to defend Russian units, but aside from armor, they don’t have much… their shell is second to last for armor penetration (only my poor Challengers are behind them) and their reverse is very poor. Instead of pointing fingers at the obvious bullshit gaijin do, like the missiles on Russian IFVs or light tanks that don’t explode when destroyed, or the Harry Potter-esque shells that disappear, keep bashing Russian tanks for their stats without even knowing them. Just to avoid any misunderstandings, I’m Italian and I play British tanks for the love of Challengers. Not to be arrogant, but because of the bullshit you’re spouting, Gaijin keeps doing what he wants. I honestly advise anyone who thinks US or German tanks are inferior to Russians (in-game, that is) to learn where to shoot and how to move. Because if you can’t play those tanks, then either I’m God using challengers or you’re truly terrible. And before you respond, none, and I mean none, of your factions have a massive mantlet made of 90% air. A 25mm explosive penetrates like butter and kills the entire crew, so don’t make me laugh with your Abrams.
4 Likes
Sure,
Probably bad-faith players wasted their time on this forum doing bad-faith act
And 5 horsemen of elitism voted against the poll
:)
2 Likes
Ch2’s could be a lot better, they just refuse to fix them
2 Likes
Genuinely speaking, “good” player of this forum according to statshark
I could walk you all on live matches to get a closer look of your elite plays and make review post about what you did on this forum
Since you’re so self-made “skilled” while Gaijin wouldn’t dared to implement SBMM to War Thunder because they’re well aware that balance will hurts their bottom lines, personal interest. TLDR - there were no balance to be honest.
500,000 GE Tournament to boost up the made-up META legitimate.
I’ve seen enough vt4 to 12.7 and vt4a1 to 13.0
1 Like