But you are forgetting that those 6 missiles are 2.2 mach while spices and mavericks are subsonic. And sending that much munitions would require you to spend more time in spaa fov. Not just pantsir considering game gathers multiple teams.
but they have to cover 20 km, their spirits are flagging, and they’re following a predictable path.
Exactly what allows ammunition to be fired from various directions
I don’t think it’s fair because it applies to both sides.
Yet you are saying that the Abrams is such a bad MBT and so much worse than the T-series.
So how is it a privilage to have access to what you consider such mediocre vehicles?
It is indeed bad in the current unbalanced configuration we can see in WT, where all the lightly armored MBTs have none of the armor and none of the pen while all the heavily armored MBTs have all the armor and all the pen/capable to pen lightly armored MBTs
With my proposition of a new balance system, the Abrams would indeed become some sort of a privilege as it would represent a DPS counter against the Leos/Strvs/T-series tanks
But in the current state of the game, yes they’re mediocre. I rather play a Leo or Strv, it’s the same but more armored. No point playing an Abrams
Most of which have better mobility, better gun depression and a better reload as a compensation for their worse armor.
It’s not good enough compensation, in a corridor / short range / long range or whatever but 1v1 with no opportunity to escape, if you’re not a Leo or Strv against the t-serie you’re dead. Plus, the “better reload speed” point is not true as if you have a loader and he dies, you’re gonna reload way slower than the t-serie. Same thing if your autoloader is dead because of power system also dead, in Leclercs or Types for example
In other word : in 80% of the fights which are regular normal fights 1v1 short medium range, NATO MBTs have all of the minus and none of the plus
That’s the reason why Russian is green everywhere at top tier you know, it’s not rocket science. In the current unbalance configuration of the game, they just have better stuff than NATO
Just lmao.
Going forwards, bvm and 90m are pratically as fast as Abrams, if not even faster
Don’t need to f*cking go backwards when u can lolpen everything that’s infront of you
How is it favored towards Russian tanks when they aren’t even ranked in the top 5-10 of 12.7 lmao.
As long as they’re green, which they’ve been for several years now, I don’t care about your coping on the subject russian bot. When Russia will reach 30-40% top tier winrates as NATO reached for several years now, we can talk
For the moment, they’re just biased, and everybody knows it
Funny, considering the abrams has the second best penning top tier round in the game, while T-90M has one of the worst.
you can reload without a loader, a T-series cannot reload with a broken loader.
You can replenish crew as well
They can bring as many russian bots as they want on this thread, it won’t prevent the majority of people from believing there is a russian bias in the game, which there is.
The more ridiculous and fallacious your arguments are towards Russia, the more the people watch and understand this game is a russian propaganda. It won’t help your cause
Russian bias is real and the T-90M hides under your bed at night
1 Like
BVM is pretty similar in forward mobility in comparison to SEP.
90M is much worse though.
The challenger lmfao
You can get closer if map isnt just flat field.
Su34 can also do this. Not necessarily different directions, just getting closer will reduce spaa reaction time a lot given kh38 speed and fact most top tier spaa have vertical or diagonal launchers.
It does apply to all sides. And in this case kh38 still has its trump card - speed.
1 Like
It’s the second best MBT at top tier, only really behind the 2A7s/122s.
- you are the one coping
- you are so mediocre at the game, are you sure you aren’t the bot here?
Again, just lmao.
If you spend as much time actually learning the game as you spend on this forum, maybe you would have actually been a good player and you wouldn’t struggle so much against these easy to fight T-series.
1 Like
The point is, no matter what the situation is, you only have 6 missiles, whilst the others have 22 and are now going to have 26 there’s simply no comparison
6 hydrogen bombs vs 22 coughing babies.
I still wouldnt throw their qualities out of the equation.
I’m available we can test it out if you have a Panstir. You send me 6 KH-38s from the airfield and I’ll send you 16 Spices, and we’ll see what happens
But su34 isnt limited to using kh38s from just airfield. And Im about to play with my friend rn so Im unavailable, sorry. Plus tests in near brilliant conditions where everyone knows enemy next move dont really reflect actual battles. Might write back once Im done if I wont get busy doing smth else.
1 Like
Yes, bvm and 90m are practically as fast as their US counter in the same BR, aka S+EP
+11.10^-2 for the 90m during the first 0-30 (which is the speed you reach midfight) is absolutely nothing, this is like they’d have the same speed
That’s what I kept talking about the other days, top tier russian MBTs are as fast as NATO MBTs, going forward. There is no balance, even in terms of mobility
Not really my issue you can’t read basic tables properly.
Now you’re gonna stop making me waste my time with you, because you’re going in circle, I can develop 154 long posts about how the game is unbalanced and favorize Russia, you’ll still cope inventing things and saying Russia bad Abrams good. It’s like talking to an AI and trying to make it say something it cannot say because of the algorithm. Your algorithm can’t criticize Russia
Stop talking to me, go make your propaganda on some other weak minds on which it could work. Won’t work with me buddy
Dude that’s been crying over propaganda and bias for the longest time is now talking about weak minds lol.