But the Su-34’s downtier already has an anti-air system with 8 missiles, and 4 etc.
You’re a bot equipped with algorithms who I’m convinced just started its shift to make his daily russian propaganda, there is no point arguing with you, so I just won’t you know.
You’re reacting to keywords or expressions suchs as “LMURs are op”, “KH-38s are completely unbalanced”, “Spike/MMP missiles don’t hit anything” and automatically defend Russia, an AI has more conversation than you.
I was talking about design. Also when map doesnt let me use kh38mts, I can just sit back and play “radar screen” on airfield and spam kh38ml at points on map.
Yes, you can, but a Mamba has 16+16 missiles, whereas you only have 6 Kh-38s. A standard Pantsir has 12+12, and an Israeli F-15E has 16 SPICE missiles plus 6 Mavericks. Do you see what I mean?
In an ideal scenario, you have to rearm six times, whereas an F-15 doesn’t have to do it at all. Do you get it?
I am definitely a bot yes, mhm
I can’t believe this CofCof guy is not trolling by saying with such assurance the SM-SV is ok and balanced
Another algorithm defending RU ?
SadRIPer might be worse than tiger tank 1
1 Like
But you are forgetting that those 6 missiles are 2.2 mach while spices and mavericks are subsonic. And sending that much munitions would require you to spend more time in spaa fov. Not just pantsir considering game gathers multiple teams.
but they have to cover 20 km, their spirits are flagging, and they’re following a predictable path.
Exactly what allows ammunition to be fired from various directions
I don’t think it’s fair because it applies to both sides.
Yet you are saying that the Abrams is such a bad MBT and so much worse than the T-series.
So how is it a privilage to have access to what you consider such mediocre vehicles?
It is indeed bad in the current unbalanced configuration we can see in WT, where all the lightly armored MBTs have none of the armor and none of the pen while all the heavily armored MBTs have all the armor and all the pen/capable to pen lightly armored MBTs
With my proposition of a new balance system, the Abrams would indeed become some sort of a privilege as it would represent a DPS counter against the Leos/Strvs/T-series tanks
But in the current state of the game, yes they’re mediocre. I rather play a Leo or Strv, it’s the same but more armored. No point playing an Abrams
Most of which have better mobility, better gun depression and a better reload as a compensation for their worse armor.
It’s not good enough compensation, in a corridor / short range / long range or whatever but 1v1 with no opportunity to escape, if you’re not a Leo or Strv against the t-serie you’re dead. Plus, the “better reload speed” point is not true as if you have a loader and he dies, you’re gonna reload way slower than the t-serie. Same thing if your autoloader is dead because of power system also dead, in Leclercs or Types for example
In other word : in 80% of the fights which are regular normal fights 1v1 short medium range, NATO MBTs have all of the minus and none of the plus
That’s the reason why Russian is green everywhere at top tier you know, it’s not rocket science. In the current unbalance configuration of the game, they just have better stuff than NATO
Just lmao.
Going forwards, bvm and 90m are pratically as fast as Abrams, if not even faster
Don’t need to f*cking go backwards when u can lolpen everything that’s infront of you
How is it favored towards Russian tanks when they aren’t even ranked in the top 5-10 of 12.7 lmao.
As long as they’re green, which they’ve been for several years now, I don’t care about your coping on the subject russian bot. When Russia will reach 30-40% top tier winrates as NATO reached for several years now, we can talk
For the moment, they’re just biased, and everybody knows it
Funny, considering the abrams has the second best penning top tier round in the game, while T-90M has one of the worst.
you can reload without a loader, a T-series cannot reload with a broken loader.
You can replenish crew as well
They can bring as many russian bots as they want on this thread, it won’t prevent the majority of people from believing there is a russian bias in the game, which there is.
The more ridiculous and fallacious your arguments are towards Russia, the more the people watch and understand this game is a russian propaganda. It won’t help your cause
Russian bias is real and the T-90M hides under your bed at night
2 Likes
BVM is pretty similar in forward mobility in comparison to SEP.
90M is much worse though.
The challenger lmfao
You can get closer if map isnt just flat field.
Su34 can also do this. Not necessarily different directions, just getting closer will reduce spaa reaction time a lot given kh38 speed and fact most top tier spaa have vertical or diagonal launchers.
It does apply to all sides. And in this case kh38 still has its trump card - speed.
1 Like
It’s the second best MBT at top tier, only really behind the 2A7s/122s.
- you are the one coping
- you are so mediocre at the game, are you sure you aren’t the bot here?
Again, just lmao.
If you spend as much time actually learning the game as you spend on this forum, maybe you would have actually been a good player and you wouldn’t struggle so much against these easy to fight T-series.
1 Like
The point is, no matter what the situation is, you only have 6 missiles, whilst the others have 22 and are now going to have 26 there’s simply no comparison