True, it would be nice to see it go down in br for ground. Maybe air too, it’s not 11.7 material
2 Likes
Re-read what I typed and try again. I think you’re not quite getting my point.
YOU look at the top players and see what they are doing with certain vehicles. This is done expressly with a view to improving your gameplay. Fine. Good. Whatever. Doesn’t have anything to do with what vehicles are objectively overperforming though, does it?
I AM looking at the stats with a view to game balance. In the thread that is basically all about game balance. The thread is not called ‘What vehicles are doing well when used by ultra-dedicated players and how can I improve?’
Totally different points.
How about f111f then? You get plenty of fnf but you need stars to align to get some good amount of kills. Otherwise its fnf spaa, s1 or sm sv intercepting your stuff and constant paranoia because your rwr wasnt built for 2010s+ monstrosities. And mavericks from low level approach struggle to kill enemies in one hit.
But what are US and German players complaining about? I agree that bias exists, but you have good armor and shells that already penetrate anything when aimed at weak spots. Just to mention, you have the two highest-penetration shells in the entire game (as if there was any need, with my L27A1 I have no problem destroying any Russian tank). At 2000m and 60-degree inclination, they penetrate 33mm more than the British, and that’s the worst figure of the US ones; better not to mention the German ones. If you want to be immortal and just shoot randomly and pierce, then you’re no better than what they’re doing now with the Russians. I repeat, the problem isn’t armor or penetration, but the little things that ruin the game in a meta where it’s difficult to get two shots off the enemy. Disappearing rounds, parts that don’t create splinters, anti-splinter coatings that should allow you to respond to people shooting at random but that weren’t included, exposed missiles with a 100% chance of exploding while others have a 0% chance, etc… The tanks of the various nations are beautiful precisely because each has its own strengths and weaknesses. I’ve seen challenger players complain that they’re slow, but damn you, that’s their mentality! They were designed specifically to be mobile bunkers, why play them if you want to be fast? Of course, this is a game and not an international espionage system, and gaijin should loosen their grip on the technical documentation a bit. There’s already more invention here than at a science fair anyway.
1 Like
I may be biased, but I like the F-111 :) ( I know he’s just a bit of a rascal, but I like him and I spend a lot of time with him at 11.7 )
I also do like it but when its full downtiers. And I like its, su24 and su34 designs.
But the Su-34’s downtier already has an anti-air system with 8 missiles, and 4 etc.
You’re a bot equipped with algorithms who I’m convinced just started its shift to make his daily russian propaganda, there is no point arguing with you, so I just won’t you know.
You’re reacting to keywords or expressions suchs as “LMURs are op”, “KH-38s are completely unbalanced”, “Spike/MMP missiles don’t hit anything” and automatically defend Russia, an AI has more conversation than you.
I was talking about design. Also when map doesnt let me use kh38mts, I can just sit back and play “radar screen” on airfield and spam kh38ml at points on map.
Yes, you can, but a Mamba has 16+16 missiles, whereas you only have 6 Kh-38s. A standard Pantsir has 12+12, and an Israeli F-15E has 16 SPICE missiles plus 6 Mavericks. Do you see what I mean?
In an ideal scenario, you have to rearm six times, whereas an F-15 doesn’t have to do it at all. Do you get it?
I am definitely a bot yes, mhm
I can’t believe this CofCof guy is not trolling by saying with such assurance the SM-SV is ok and balanced
Another algorithm defending RU ?
SadRIPer might be worse than tiger tank 1
1 Like
But you are forgetting that those 6 missiles are 2.2 mach while spices and mavericks are subsonic. And sending that much munitions would require you to spend more time in spaa fov. Not just pantsir considering game gathers multiple teams.
but they have to cover 20 km, their spirits are flagging, and they’re following a predictable path.
Exactly what allows ammunition to be fired from various directions
I don’t think it’s fair because it applies to both sides.
Yet you are saying that the Abrams is such a bad MBT and so much worse than the T-series.
So how is it a privilage to have access to what you consider such mediocre vehicles?
It is indeed bad in the current unbalanced configuration we can see in WT, where all the lightly armored MBTs have none of the armor and none of the pen while all the heavily armored MBTs have all the armor and all the pen/capable to pen lightly armored MBTs
With my proposition of a new balance system, the Abrams would indeed become some sort of a privilege as it would represent a DPS counter against the Leos/Strvs/T-series tanks
But in the current state of the game, yes they’re mediocre. I rather play a Leo or Strv, it’s the same but more armored. No point playing an Abrams
Most of which have better mobility, better gun depression and a better reload as a compensation for their worse armor.
It’s not good enough compensation, in a corridor / short range / long range or whatever but 1v1 with no opportunity to escape, if you’re not a Leo or Strv against the t-serie you’re dead. Plus, the “better reload speed” point is not true as if you have a loader and he dies, you’re gonna reload way slower than the t-serie. Same thing if your autoloader is dead because of power system also dead, in Leclercs or Types for example
In other word : in 80% of the fights which are regular normal fights 1v1 short medium range, NATO MBTs have all of the minus and none of the plus
That’s the reason why Russian is green everywhere at top tier you know, it’s not rocket science. In the current unbalance configuration of the game, they just have better stuff than NATO
Just lmao.
Going forwards, bvm and 90m are pratically as fast as Abrams, if not even faster
Don’t need to f*cking go backwards when u can lolpen everything that’s infront of you
How is it favored towards Russian tanks when they aren’t even ranked in the top 5-10 of 12.7 lmao.
As long as they’re green, which they’ve been for several years now, I don’t care about your coping on the subject russian bot. When Russia will reach 30-40% top tier winrates as NATO reached for several years now, we can talk
For the moment, they’re just biased, and everybody knows it
Funny, considering the abrams has the second best penning top tier round in the game, while T-90M has one of the worst.
you can reload without a loader, a T-series cannot reload with a broken loader.
You can replenish crew as well
They can bring as many russian bots as they want on this thread, it won’t prevent the majority of people from believing there is a russian bias in the game, which there is.
The more ridiculous and fallacious your arguments are towards Russia, the more the people watch and understand this game is a russian propaganda. It won’t help your cause