The problem is that it was necessary Russia had no air defence system capable of dealing with NATO’s CAS, whereas NATO did.
Not to be that guy but what about pre 11.7 nato
Which Russian aircraft has more than two ‘fire-and-forget’ missiles with a 11.7 ?
Ahem… obviously every NATO main was mass-hallucinating the presence of these then?
RU Top Tier DID NOT NEED overpowered additions like the SV. It was doing very well with it’s existing broken vehicles and Helicopters with 360 degree LIRCM shenanigan / magical energy shield…
3 Likes
Yes Normal Panstir vs 16 Spices plus 6 mavericks
Ah-64E left chat
2 Likes
In the past yes, now NATO CAS is very much capable of being on par.
Speaking of SM-SV, there’s a really funny counter to it that the US has.
Electronic warfare
1 Like
Nobody here disagrees with you that Russia didn’t need the SM-SV, that was a bs addition
Of course they do, otherwise GAIJIN would have to limit the arsenals of NATO countries
It’s not like the Brimstones haven’t already wiped out the normal panstir of history
1 Like
they already are
1 Like
Yet you are saying that the Abrams is such a bad MBT and so much worse than the T-series.
So how is it a privilage to have access to what you consider such mediocre vehicles?
Most of which have better mobility, better gun depression and a better reload as a compensation for their worse armor.
Just lmao.
How is it favored towards Russian tanks when they aren’t even ranked in the top 5-10 of 12.7 lmao.
Again, you confuse your personal struggles with balance problems.
I’m going to pick a Merkava Mk.4 over a T-series every time any day of the week.
1 Like
Went from saying Leo and ZTZ are the only competitive tanks to saying Leo and T-series are the only competitive tanks and then bringing up the Abrams as a positive even though they were painting it as supposedly a very bad vehicle before, lol
2 Likes
While also claiming Japan is a western nation and failing to prove it
I’m sorry, but if you can’t do basic geography, you probably shouldn’t be spreading your opinion here
Su24m is within pre 11.7 interval I was talking about but thing is you dont need that much. Intruder easily wipes out 4-5 enemies without getting killed while having no fnf at all for example. And a10c despite having 6 fnf + ton of gbu39 sucks completely at 11.7.
A-10C could go to 11.3 and still be meh
It’s simply not built for this kind of environment.
In air sim though… that’s different
1 Like
Same could be said about skill level not gonna lie
1 Like
The problem with the A-10C is its mobility. In rgb is just Bad
Because you judge the vehicle based on average player’s experience like if they stuggled then your performance is also capped? that’s not the type of mentality I would imagine someone can improve at the game bro because you are using a sample of numbers that include players who are completely dogwater at the game, they doesn’t even know what they were doing like why would I wanted to know their numbers? my logic is I like to focus on the vehicle potential because a good player already defined what it can achieve, and I only want to be half as good. It’s not complex, the core philosophy is pretty easy to explain, I focus on what I could control, like I can adapt the playstyle to overcome the vehicle weaknesses.
That would drag it away from top tier spaa at least and help a lot.