If I didn’t put money in the game I wouldn’t care + don’t joke about “german main being blind” because this is exactly the argument russian bots here use to explain the 30% german winrates at top tier GRB.
Allegedly, german mains would all be “blind” and “dumb”.
Well the German mains sometimes are indeed blind (happens also with other mains, but never French ones)… but at the end of the day it’s just a meme caused by the fact that sometimes people using a tiger tank after watching some documentary thinks their tank is immortal and rush the enemy spawn point full of Pt76. The Russian bias is basically the same.
They should have given 2 anti-ERA DARTs capable of pening Kontakt and Relikts to lightly armored NATO MBTs DAY ONE, in order to introduce a proper balance.
Abrams/Challys/Leclercs/Arietes/Merkavas/Types have trash armor → you give them the ability to pen russian MBTs from anywhere in compensation
Leos and Strvs shouldn’t get the anti-ERA DARTs to compensate their good armor
That, is balance. It wouldn’t make russian MBTs worse, as they would easily pen lightly armored NATO MBTs from anywhere, and wouldn’t be pened from anywhere by Leos/Strvs.
Is that so difficult to balance the game for both Russia and NATO ?
EDIT: plus it would have introduced a “class” mechanic into the game, where Leos/Strvs tank, and the others DPS. Russia side → Russia tank, and you give them any other NATO nation with lightly armored MBTs to give their teams DPS. But it would require matchmaking to have a constant pattern where let’s say Russia have Russia + China + Italy on their side, and NATO have the rest
So you should tell the russian bots here the very red german winrates at top tier GRB are not explained by german mains being blind, stupid and bad.
But by something else : randomly like that, maybe a russian bias at top tier grb ?
Me when I’m in a completion of not understanding something so simple
Let’s start by the fact that low BR win rates shouldn’t be calculated.
People has just started playing the game, they are new players; 90% of your team is like that.
Ofc you are not expecting to win when half of your team is made of newbies which just want to get to the first Tiger.
Wait my bad I’ve read low br not high sorry
I’m only talking about top tier GRB, and not even with premium vehicles in those games.
So there are like, 0% new players there
Well, that 0% ain’t that true… open some teammates account stats next time… ;)
No btw the more I read this the more I confuse myself.
Sooo are you saying German high tier players have a bad win rate only cuz of Russia?
Like the 8 others playable nations doesn’t contribute to that result at all??
Sweden that have vehicles from the 90s at like 5.7?? Okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
To balance things more, specifically to vehicles themselves : you give MMP/Spike missiles the ability to perfectly hit ennemies from a vertical top-down approach and massive post-pen dmg, BUT you give every single nation facing those Spike/MMP missiles IFVs MBTs with APS capabilities. This way, it’s balanced
You give the exact same top-down approach to LMURs/JAGMs/PARS/Spikes. Maybe give LMURs more dmg to compensate the fact Mi-28NMs only have 8 of them. BUT you give german and french helis 16 FnF, not 8/12 as they have currently. This way, it’s balanced
Is that so hard to introduce balance ?
Sure, if we also nerf their gun handling, gun depression, reload and mobility to the same levels as the T-series.
It wouldn’t make them worse, it would make them worthless. The Abrams is already a better tank than the T-series in almost every regard bar armor. And now you want to take away that single advantage that the T-series still have?
You don’t want balance, you just want an easy mode tank to compensate for your terminal skill issue.
You MIGHT be a German main… I’m not sure tho maybe a bird said that to me
Sooo are you saying German high tier players have a bad win rate only cuz of Russia?
Because of Russia and China, yes. But don’t worry, not Germany only is affected by their dominance, all NATO nations are. That’s the reason why Russia has green winrates everywhere at top tier GRB BRs, and no NATO nation does
There is a pattern at top tier GRB where Russia is very often against all NATO, and rarely with them. So it explains the green winrates. But if Russia was 100% of the time against whole NATO and never ever teamed up with them, NATO nations would have had even more red winrates
It’s just, logical
Bro is still throwing china in there lmao.
They also consist of a group that bought top tier goonbrams/clickbait/ t-80ue/leopard goon that average 0.3-0.5 KD and throw most the the matches at toptier by going 0-1/0-2 then proceed to go 0-3 after their third spawn m22 or kv-2 is killed, good thing is both sides has them and they kinda cancel each others out lol
Sooooo if I tell you like my Su34 has a red win rate cuz of Aim120D is this still Russian bias??
China is just a Russia bis with a little bit less armor and a little bit more mobility/gun agility, with the privilege of having a touch of U.S equipments such as AH-64E and Abrams, so they can be compared to Russia without having to debate about it.
At least in GRB… sadly I play more ARB and there this type of people is a real problem they just spam every Fox 3 at ONE plane and then crash or kill a friendly… they absolutely ruin the game
Soooooo when a Chinese main use the Abrams in their tree they loose the bias? Then gain it back the moment they play a continental China tank??? This make no sense bro