Because Russian MBTs are already meh and don’t need their only strength taken away lol.
You struggling against T-series because of your skill issues doesn’t suddenly make them strong.
7 Likes
Cry me a river
becoz making the ru vehicle bad will definitely cause a decline in Russian military exports and someone in powah will get them for this /s
the dev will defintiely get caught and send back to 1930s via time machine and get punished in gulag even when they currently operate under european union law which is completely out of reach of the Kremlin.
2 Likes
Being so angry about something you cannot even change lol
Even if you are right a Russian bias do exist? What u gonna do?? Go personally at Gaijin HQ in a comically angry walk with steam clouds out of your years and nerf all the Russian tree??
The Russian bias meme started as a meme and ITS a meme, same thing as “German main blinds” ]personally I find like only the 10% are actually blind, the others usually snipe me through the map (THEY ONE SHOT MY RUSSIAN VEHICLE!!! GERMAN BIASSSSSSS)]
You don’t get it.
RU tanks aren’t allowed to have any positive sides in order for balance to be achieved.
3 Likes
They don’t need to be under the influence of the Kremlin to act in favor of Russia in general.
The playerbase is largely made from russian and chinese people, so they give unfair advantages to Russia and China to bring more money to the company, it’s that simple.
It’s exactly like the Battlefield games largely sold to american / occidental people in general and picturing a “USA is the best” situation in all their games
It doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do for occidental players playing WT, or oriental players playing BF. As a mater of fact, since the saudi fund bought back EA, BF6 now puts on a pedestal “Pax Armata”, who are basically Russia + Iran + China + part of Europe not ok with NATO/the U.S. in general, altogether. What a coincidence, videogame companies picture a propaganda depending on who their playerbase is, who would have thought ?
If I didn’t put money in the game I wouldn’t care + don’t joke about “german main being blind” because this is exactly the argument russian bots here use to explain the 30% german winrates at top tier GRB.
Allegedly, german mains would all be “blind” and “dumb”.
Well the German mains sometimes are indeed blind (happens also with other mains, but never French ones)… but at the end of the day it’s just a meme caused by the fact that sometimes people using a tiger tank after watching some documentary thinks their tank is immortal and rush the enemy spawn point full of Pt76. The Russian bias is basically the same.
They should have given 2 anti-ERA DARTs capable of pening Kontakt and Relikts to lightly armored NATO MBTs DAY ONE, in order to introduce a proper balance.
Abrams/Challys/Leclercs/Arietes/Merkavas/Types have trash armor → you give them the ability to pen russian MBTs from anywhere in compensation
Leos and Strvs shouldn’t get the anti-ERA DARTs to compensate their good armor
That, is balance. It wouldn’t make russian MBTs worse, as they would easily pen lightly armored NATO MBTs from anywhere, and wouldn’t be pened from anywhere by Leos/Strvs.
Is that so difficult to balance the game for both Russia and NATO ?
EDIT: plus it would have introduced a “class” mechanic into the game, where Leos/Strvs tank, and the others DPS. Russia side → Russia tank, and you give them any other NATO nation with lightly armored MBTs to give their teams DPS. But it would require matchmaking to have a constant pattern where let’s say Russia have Russia + China + Italy on their side, and NATO have the rest
So you should tell the russian bots here the very red german winrates at top tier GRB are not explained by german mains being blind, stupid and bad.
But by something else : randomly like that, maybe a russian bias at top tier grb ?
Me when I’m in a completion of not understanding something so simple
1 Like
Let’s start by the fact that low BR win rates shouldn’t be calculated.
People has just started playing the game, they are new players; 90% of your team is like that.
Ofc you are not expecting to win when half of your team is made of newbies which just want to get to the first Tiger.
Wait my bad I’ve read low br not high sorry
I’m only talking about top tier GRB, and not even with premium vehicles in those games.
So there are like, 0% new players there
Well, that 0% ain’t that true… open some teammates account stats next time… ;)
No btw the more I read this the more I confuse myself.
Sooo are you saying German high tier players have a bad win rate only cuz of Russia?
Like the 8 others playable nations doesn’t contribute to that result at all??
Sweden that have vehicles from the 90s at like 5.7?? Okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
To balance things more, specifically to vehicles themselves : you give MMP/Spike missiles the ability to perfectly hit ennemies from a vertical top-down approach and massive post-pen dmg, BUT you give every single nation facing those Spike/MMP missiles IFVs MBTs with APS capabilities. This way, it’s balanced
You give the exact same top-down approach to LMURs/JAGMs/PARS/Spikes. Maybe give LMURs more dmg to compensate the fact Mi-28NMs only have 8 of them. BUT you give german and french helis 16 FnF, not 8/12 as they have currently. This way, it’s balanced
Is that so hard to introduce balance ?
Sure, if we also nerf their gun handling, gun depression, reload and mobility to the same levels as the T-series.
It wouldn’t make them worse, it would make them worthless. The Abrams is already a better tank than the T-series in almost every regard bar armor. And now you want to take away that single advantage that the T-series still have?
You don’t want balance, you just want an easy mode tank to compensate for your terminal skill issue.
5 Likes
You MIGHT be a German main… I’m not sure tho maybe a bird said that to me
1 Like
Sooo are you saying German high tier players have a bad win rate only cuz of Russia?
Because of Russia and China, yes. But don’t worry, not Germany only is affected by their dominance, all NATO nations are. That’s the reason why Russia has green winrates everywhere at top tier GRB BRs, and no NATO nation does
There is a pattern at top tier GRB where Russia is very often against all NATO, and rarely with them. So it explains the green winrates. But if Russia was 100% of the time against whole NATO and never ever teamed up with them, NATO nations would have had even more red winrates
It’s just, logical