Lot’s os assumptions, you sure you aren’t projecting.
I do equally well in the Chally 2s and Ariete. Unless you want to claim those are meta too?
I could also record hours upon hours of me just one shotting T-series from every angle, since that is what happens 70-80% of the time at the minimum.
Not sure, if your little games in those tanks project anything extra tbh
High KDA with sub average WR surely not camping
With META tanks surely inflated rating
Screaming you’re special with stat made me chuckles ngl
S25o, s25l, vikhr, kh25ml, kh29l/t/td/te, kh59m, kab500kr, kab500l, kab500s, fab500umpk, kab1500kr, kab1500l fighting stingers/rolands:
While “capable” a10c and f111f face s1, sm sv and multi vehicle spaa.
Show me footage of that
it’s green in sim because you are allowed to spawn CAS immediately.
Not a tanks issue
Specific vehicles that had them
it’s a stupidly short repair lmao
2s38 and bmp series were one of first who got those modules afaik. And in their case damage is much more severe than stab turning off.
Oh, one more thing about 2s38. It has external fuel tank which still explodes and kills entire tank. Dont recall this happening to nato tanks
You seem to ignore everything I’ve said to you.
Again, thinking that China is some superpower in the game has a lot of comedic value to it.
We already talked about this, apparently you’ll keep parroting things you like and there’s nothing that can change your mind.
Yes which brings us to the second part i mentioned which is the devblog with the additional explanations why the basket is modeled the way it is i.e. all the bits and pieced attached to the basket and the potential of the basket mechanically jamming the drive through deformation and on top of that the extension of said mechanic onto the Challengers which specifically do not have a basket either.
Gaijin being obscure about what they would add after the vote is one thing but these 2 things are blatant double standards.
So upset that he flags this post, amazing
Well that is not that simple.
Yes the Challenger 2 doesn’t have turret basket as like in Leopard 2 or Abrams but it connects to something inside of the hull turning it into superstucture so saying it doesnt have basket is not option here because really crew is standing on something, something that is moveing with the turret.
Russian high tier mbt’s were among the first to get autoloader modelled.
2S38 was the very very first vehicle to get detailed damage model.
You voted to let Gaijin cook up what vehicles got what modules and the effects they would have. you cant jusr now say “no no but this isnt what I wanted”. this is directly what you voted for, to give Gaijin permission to fool around and do what they want.
Yeah and now go a bit further and think if we might have vehicles in the game that don’t have a basket either but something similar to what you just described.
Ok cool and does the autoloader have the same features that the current basket implementation does?
Sick another guy who doesn’t understand how voting works.
No negative impact on turret traverse, while the basket makes any MBT defenseless for 45 secons or something.
Voting on the forum instead of in game is the first sign of trouble.
Idk if that is the burn you think it is.
All you are pointing out here is that I can do well in these tanks even while they are stock while you are still mediocre in them even after hundreds of games.
that was not the topic. you pretend like russian vehicles never got any modules while being the first to get them.
this is how voting works both in real life and in games, disagreeing with this just shows how ignorant you are.
like 20s tops if your crew isnt too bad.
