Only paper ships from one nation are unbalanced
Actually only one : Sov
There are no paper ships in War Thunder, so your post contains obvious disinformation.
Also I have one question:
Is M10 Booker a paper tank to you?
Keep crying buddy.
At mid-high tier I ha really hard time with Russian ground veichles, problem I haven’t found on other trees.
The prototypes problem is not only russian cuz they placed things like the Begleitpanzer57 (only one prototype built) and the Kpz70/his American version in the normal tree while you have mass produced vehicles such as the L39 albatross placed as Premiums.
1 Like
I don’t care about M10
Remove it if you want
Soyuz IRL has a keel made of steel, the rest was never mounted and is therefore : thin air
I have nothing against implementing a realistic soyuz with 2000 dude sitting on one metal plate and a few compartments with no guns, no engines and no armor belt.
I’ll gladly give my Clemenceau up this instant if Sov disappears from top tier.
Russian mains like to repeat NATO should have built more AA when mentioning the obvious imbalance in that area. Well I guess the soviet navy should have built more battleships
Because ships are too expensive to make a distinction especially in the timeframe we have in war thunder. Youre comparing apples to oranges. Tanks and Aircraft have much harsher standards than ships.
This is enough for a ship to be eligible for addition into war thunder, do you think a tank or aircraft in the corresponding state of building would be eligible?
Crew sailing into battle on this with the power of thoughts and prayers
2 Likes
I don’t want production vehicles [which includes Soyuz] removed from War Thunder, because then we lose all prototypes in War Thunder as well, then War Thunder just becomes another boring game.
@H_ngma
Considering M10 Booker is in the game, tanks in that unfinished production runs & cancelled for service are added to the game.
The production looks different, because different sizes of vehicles; but M10 Booker is THE tank equivalent of laid down ships later cancelled.
You cannot hate on laid down ships without hating on M10 Booker, it’s impossible.
How do you manage to contradict yourself only 10 words apart ?
This kind of reasoning is genuinely impressive. Not in a good way, but still
If you can’t see why an Iowa can be considered a true and produced ship and not Soyuz, we can stop there. There’s nothing i can do to help you
The M10 could move, shoot and do all that stuff on its own. Do you think if we push the ship on my picture off the slipway that it can do any of that?
A. sure you can just look at the difference between the state of the Booker pre cancellation and the state of the ship in the picture.
B. Im not hating laid down ships, i rather like the idea of unfinished ships getting their deserved spotlight. Im hating unbalanced additions that are only unbalanced, because Gaijin decided to implement fantasy stats instead of a balanced and equally or even more realistic iteration.
I’m not even sure that… thing has enough buoyancy to float anywhere, assuming you can move it to the water in the first place X)
Just a metal Noel’s arc waiting for the flood
1 Like
Gets funnier when you consider, NATO tanks have APUs
1 Like
Everyone got added modules, BUT :
1m0s : T-90M (no changes)
AND
1m50s : ZTZ99A (no changes)
Absolutely no preference for eastern nations in Russia Thunder :)
China and Gaijin preference in a single sentence lmao.
Still clueless I see.
4 Likes
China must be so strong then, go play it and enjoy the bias.
2 Likes
Ah yes, truly the most overpowered tank in the game
Definitely not stuck with shitty armour and second longest reload at top tier.
T-90M isn’t even that good lol
Oh, what about the leclerc FCS btw?
5 Likes
Hence the fact ZTZ got no added modules, as well as T-90M.
Hence the fact Tor-M1/HQ17 (can’t remember which one) has the same multi targeting mechanic as the Pantsirs, while none of the NATO SPAAs have it.
Hence the fact Gaijin arbitrated Taiwan belongs to China, puting the subtree into the chinese TT, and not to Japan/the U.S. instead (as an independant country, as it is nowadays currently).
Your point being ? I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say
The fact that most chinese domestic MBTs at high tier are mediocre and they needed an Abrams to help them tells you enough how much Gaijin likes them.
Also Top tier China air has been getting shit on by Gaijin for the last 6 months straight, and that trent isn’t changing with a worse PoBIT.
4 Likes
Ah yes, truly the most overpowered tank in the game
Definitely not stuck with shitty armour and second longest reload at top tier.
It’s not the point. The point is : they favorize eastern nations, including China, by not giving them modules, while every other NATO nations get them.
If you want, we can talk about how “shitty” NATO armors are in comparaison, especially Leclercs, Arietes, Challengers, Types, Abrams, Merkavas (to sum up : all of them).
Let’s also talk about how Gaijin considers that the U.S. , the biggest and most wealthy military in the world, decided, according to them, not to improve the SEP V3 hull armor, 46 years after the release of the first Abrams, lol. We can also talk about the fact they gave 12.7 Abrams an anti-ERA DART not capable of pening 12.7 Relikt russian ERAs (very useful). Or maybe the turret added armor on those, absolutely useless as russian MBTs already cannot pen them there.
T-90M isn’t even that good lol
Not the point, even if the russian winrates at top tier GRB proves otherwise.
Oh, what about the leclerc FCS btw?
You’re so dishonest you can’t even admit Leclercs are one of the only NATO MBTs out there having a power system connected to a water pump which, when it breaks, will prevent Leclercs from turning horizontally or vertically the turret, lol. Can’t see that on russian or chinese MBTs. Pure hasard, I guess.
Now you’re evading your original point.
This is hilarious
3 Likes