Yes if someone says theyre gonna do something then i dont expect them to do the opposite. Crazy concept i know.
Thr internal modules are eating spall.
Actually boosting survivability.
5s repair for FCS isn’t a major problem
1 Like
These are grown men and having technical jobs, its crazy to think they have terrible Reading Comprehension
It also the return attitude in the other hand, Otherwise, deep state conspiracy that I’m too tired to mentioned.
1 Like
That would be deleting modules from tank buddy you keep imagining things
10.0 - 10.7 definitely doesn’t get obliterated.
11.0 - 11.7 is a literal black hole for US/GER vehicles and as such having competitive win rates there is impossible.
It has everything to do with CAS.
2 Likes
No saying you make stuff more detailed and then mashing together things is also an opposite but you keep being illiterate.
1 Like
Exactly, CAS is the issue.
Not the MBTs
1 Like
No you keep imagining thins no one showed how much detailed it will be
No one showed anything. We had exactly one statement about what theyd do and they did just not what they said. So trying to put Gaijins current implementation of baskets and drives on the community is just the ridiculous attempt of you trying to excuse Gaijins blatant double standards.
Add more modules which happend.
What ever you imagined is not what devs will do.
No they said
which is very specifically not ‘‘were going to mash together horizontal drives and turret baskets into one module and then later on include rotating turret floors into the same role while keeping autoloader carousels completely separate.’’
So please do explain how the community voted for the current implementation.
Easy you keep again and again projecting you own imagination on things promised on vote
There’ll be new types of modules, ranging from electronic modules for air defense vehicles, machine gun ammunition, electrical equipment, as well as detailing and correcting guidance modules such as the drives.
It literally says new types of modules well here you go turret basket.
1 Like
Brother you literally got what you voted for.
2 Likes
Where? Where did the community vote for mashing together modules that should be detailed and separate and selectively implementing a turret drive block mechanic to different types of baskets/rotating floors that conveniently leave out autoloader carousels?
The community voted for detailed modules for everyone.
1 Like
Where it says for everyone ?
a more detailed damage model to specific vehicles
Yeah specific vehicles. Not specific vehicles that are strictly non russian
Everyone =/= Everything
3 Likes
I’m talking about the power system, not the FCS. Can you read ?
The power system destroys your battery thus slows down the turret traverse + makes you stop + delete the quick reload rate with autoloaders. Only NATO MBTs have those power systems (and light tanks)
FCS also makes you unable to shoot, reload or move the turret on Leclercs. It’s the special touch from Gaijin who we all know loves France very much
Yes they are getting rekt by Russia from 10 to 13 grb, are you colorblind man ? Can’t you see it’s all green everywhere for Russia ?
It’s been like that for months, years. Even more green in sim. And again, in grb, it would be even more green than currently if Russia + China were always teamed up together against whole NATO
Game is just not balanced and heavily biased towards Russia, why don’t you just admit it ? 3x more players queuing for Russia at top tier GRB BRs compared to ALL the other players queuing for the rest of the nations is not enough for you ?
Market sees who’s constantly wining, market knows the META, market plays the META, that’s simple
Does nato get capable spaa at those brs?