If they say they want to do things more detailed and separate then its fair to assume that they wont do things less separate and less detailed. Or are you conceding that the devs have a massive hard on for pampering russian equipment?
Or they could give heavily armored NATO MBTs (Leos, STRVs) NO capabilities to pen Relikts, but anti-ERA DARTs capable to pen Relikts to all the other paper armored NATO MBTs
This way some nations tank and some others do DPS
It should be balanced this way
Currently, Leos/Strvs have both the armor and pen, and weak MBTs like the Leclercs have none of the armor nor pen lol.
You know that 13.0 vehicles can still see 12.0 ones ?
RU win rates are pretty much either a result of CAS spam or lack of literal vehicles from opposing countries. You see how great they’re doing at 10.0 - 10.7 which is a BR range that has way less CAS spam and other nations actually have something to spawn there.

See you just keep coping on how they would implement it no one showed how exactly it will be but you people imagined stuff and now acting like it was promised.
Stop your “CAS spam” bs you russian main
NATO also have capable CAS under 12.0, and russian CAS are not op under 12.0. NATO still get obliterated between 10 and 11.7, Russia is green everywhere there
12.0 only allows 4 Mi-28NMs and KH 38 capable jet MAX, so don’t be telling me there is a spam CAS at this BR
It’s russian ground vehicles that are artificially/shadow buffed at top tier GRB, it has nothing to do with CAS
Russian CAS is just another unbalanced thing given to them at 13.0
FCS is not the power system.
Have you ever had your FCS disabled?
Your turret traverse does not slow down and as far as I’m aware it does not affect loaders.
It just disables thermals and the stabilizer
Yes if someone says theyre gonna do something then i dont expect them to do the opposite. Crazy concept i know.
Thr internal modules are eating spall.
Actually boosting survivability.
5s repair for FCS isn’t a major problem
These are grown men and having technical jobs, its crazy to think they have terrible Reading Comprehension
It also the return attitude in the other hand, Otherwise, deep state conspiracy that I’m too tired to mentioned.
That would be deleting modules from tank buddy you keep imagining things
10.0 - 10.7 definitely doesn’t get obliterated.
11.0 - 11.7 is a literal black hole for US/GER vehicles and as such having competitive win rates there is impossible.
It has everything to do with CAS.
No saying you make stuff more detailed and then mashing together things is also an opposite but you keep being illiterate.
Exactly, CAS is the issue.
Not the MBTs
No you keep imagining thins no one showed how much detailed it will be
No one showed anything. We had exactly one statement about what theyd do and they did just not what they said. So trying to put Gaijins current implementation of baskets and drives on the community is just the ridiculous attempt of you trying to excuse Gaijins blatant double standards.
Add more modules which happend.
What ever you imagined is not what devs will do.
No they said
which is very specifically not ‘‘were going to mash together horizontal drives and turret baskets into one module and then later on include rotating turret floors into the same role while keeping autoloader carousels completely separate.’’
So please do explain how the community voted for the current implementation.
Easy you keep again and again projecting you own imagination on things promised on vote
There’ll be new types of modules, ranging from electronic modules for air defense vehicles, machine gun ammunition, electrical equipment, as well as detailing and correcting guidance modules such as the drives.
It literally says new types of modules well here you go turret basket.
Brother you literally got what you voted for.
Where? Where did the community vote for mashing together modules that should be detailed and separate and selectively implementing a turret drive block mechanic to different types of baskets/rotating floors that conveniently leave out autoloader carousels?
The community voted for detailed modules for everyone.