Which was nore likely
Germans sticking a 105 gun on a tiger
Or russians dream land ship. That got as far as a hull- which i read even at building stage was dismantled due to bad rivets lol
I believe the dismantled hull was one of the other pr 23’s (yes, multiple were laid down)
Project 24 next.
When its russian theres no rules
They should of kept the german tanks, jap early jets and the rest if this is how they roll
People moan about the f16AJ yet f16s actually exist yet we have paper ships being added after others were removed. Only 1 conclusion- Russian bias.
1 Like
What I want is EVERY nations (including RUSSIA and CHINA) getting the modules at the same time.
It’s called balanced
1 Like
They reserve the rights for AAM FOX3 for premium aircraft, ARMOR and ERA for Russia first.
FCS breaking on MBTs does not stop turret traverse
1 Like
Same for all MBTs
It’s like a 5 second repair anyways
1 Like
Russia wasn’t the first nation with fox 3 for a premium aircraft though.
1 Like
Yes, I know. It’s a premium Swedish aircraft. I’m just being sarcastic. Whenever there’s something new, they always give it to Russia, even if it’s just a display model, a prototype, or unfinished. They give it to them so easily. On the other hand, when we just want something new or a change, they refuse, citing insufficient information, lack of basis, and a need for clarification.
2 Likes
To be fair - with the 27ER - they probably didn’t NEED one…
1 Like
well then time to do something we did years ago to make them do what we want for the sake of the game? iykyk
This is just sad how russian nationalism kills this game by making only one nation standout
1 Like
1938 - 1941.
If you call Soyuz paper, you’re calling M10 Booker a paper tank.
Soviets are the same rules as everyone else.
I get Russia’s your favorite country of all time, but calm down.
There are no paper ships in War Thunder.
1 Like
as an fyi,
these are all the blue water ships that were never completed in the state we see them in game (and are marked as such with ‘project’ in their name instead of a year of fit)
the Soyuz is not the only, and not the first ship to be introduced with its circumstances. and as you can see, russia isn’t even the one with the most unfinished ships.
3 Likes
how f igla lock me heli from 5.7 km? + igla have 5.2 km range but i want to lock only from 4.2 km works the missile + helicopters have les sheat than jets no?
I mean that’s exactly what fantasy means though
Armor could not exist as is. As it stands, it’s just a fantasy of what it could have been. Richelieu’s designer’s plans did not include giving poor accuracy to the 4x380mm, but guess what, it’s still what happened, because good old physics don’t care about your plans, and you can’t take all design flaws into account before construction, there will always be bad surprise on complex machines such as ships
And what is the only ship at top tier that does not have to deal with its IRL counterpart’s design flaws ? You got it
Should all be removed tbh
2 Likes
I’m calling it : floating hull.
Turrets, engine, fire directors, guns, main armor ? Thin air
Doesn’t really sound better than paper to me, but it is what it is i guess
1 Like
Some helicopters have broken IR signature for more than 7 months now. Most likely, because of the infantry mode.
2 Likes
The fact russian top tiers are among the only ones without turret baskets should already say enough.
Actually the BMPT EXISTING is already enough.
The answer to the title is: Yes. And it will always be yes. Gaijin will never change.
I hate this game, and yet I keep playing
2 Likes
Then you’d have to remove M10 Booker, all prototypes, & all trial vehicles as well for fairness.
Something which I disagree with.
Ships already have the strictest addition requirements of any vehicle in War Thunder, making even more strict is silly.
How so? All the other vehicle types have to have moved under their own power at the very least as far as i know. Ships can literally be a bunch of steel on a slipway without any major other components ever built.