Russian Bias in 2026?

Im just trying to grind the littlebird heli and spade the 8.0 and 8.3.helis at same time.

The t114 is fastest vic around the BR that iv got so can rush CP and spawn 8.3 heli.

Iv got 6 spare places for crew locks so can atleast spawn the 8.0 every game if its vs 9.0 ruski. Either this or play the dead PVE heli mode

Wny are the german tanks removed while the ruskis are getting ships and other stuff that never existed?

More of a question is what Soviet tank has ERA in 9.0 like the closest one is T-72B at 10.3 i thinks hes failed to kill Magach with blazer and thinks that is Soviet tank.

Im.not even sure it had ERA

I watched a prop drop 3 differnet GBUs on a ruski heavies head while i constantly shot it. Not sure what happemed in the end as i was killed by his team mate… stalinium

Never seen props with GBUs

A big bomb.

Habbit from arma 3

That map benefits Soviets more than any CQC map.

& yeah, Soviets have never twisted bug reports.

So bad tanks = bias…
What a take…

Yes. Its only russia again like other examples. Easiest to see is adding russian paper ships after the german tanks removed. Some bias is just more blatant

There are no paper ships in War Thunder. [Inb4 you claim M10 Booker is a paper tank by citing laid down ships.]
Soviets don’t have any meta tanks, at all.

So why do your posts contain lies?

T-55AMD1 isn’t even a top 10 9.0 tank.
T-55M is notably superior on its own.
M60A3 TTS is superior.
Etc.

Edit:
Germany has more laid down [only] ships in the game than USSR.

13m45s

Around 14m : “For some reason… we all know why”

Yes we do, we do…

Oh no, my stabiliser is gone, what do I doooooooo

Keep in mind MBT FCS getting knocked out means you only lose the stab and maybe thermals. that’s it

5 Likes

They figured out a new way to screw NATO and give an artificial buff to russian MBTs.

Let’s add a power system that only NATO vehicles have, and make it so if it’s destroyed, the FCS is destroyed too, thus the ability for you to shoot or turn the turret (happens in Leclercs). Oh and, let’s implement the said power system on the front and back of the vehicle, to make you unable to shoot back if you’re shot anywhere (because the FSC is in the middle of the tank as well). Let’s also add a turret basket for all of them (just to make sure)

On the other hand, in russian MBTs : no power system, FCS system doesn’t take out the gun/turret, not any kind of turret basket implemented

Very balanced, as always in Russia Thunder

7 Likes

Well you all wanted to get more modules on tanks like what the issue if you get it frist of you liked that idea so much.

1 Like

When was Project 23 built?

The Soyuz was under construction with a pretty large part of the hull finished when they were invaded

To call it paper is an exageration as we have plenty of other ships in other tech trees, which were in similar states, added.

This doesn’t mean there aren’t points of contention. Soyuz’s main belt being a single plate is contentious as there are multiple claims soviet naval industry couldn’t manufacture that type of armour steel at that thickness.

The guns/shells existed, but were never put in the naval triple mount so dispersion/reload rates are dubious.

Those are really the only things to care about on that ship.

To scream “russian bias fantasy ship” is just a lazy excuse from some top naval players to not learn how to actually deal with it.

Granted, it is an absolute bully to ships a br below it, but that goes for most ships.

Regards,
Someone who spaded Yamato week 1 of update leviathans.

3 Likes

Which was nore likely

Germans sticking a 105 gun on a tiger

Or russians dream land ship. That got as far as a hull- which i read even at building stage was dismantled due to bad rivets lol

I believe the dismantled hull was one of the other pr 23’s (yes, multiple were laid down)

Project 24 next.
When its russian theres no rules

They should of kept the german tanks, jap early jets and the rest if this is how they roll

People moan about the f16AJ yet f16s actually exist yet we have paper ships being added after others were removed. Only 1 conclusion- Russian bias.

1 Like

What I want is EVERY nations (including RUSSIA and CHINA) getting the modules at the same time.

It’s called balanced

1 Like

They reserve the rights for AAM FOX3 for premium aircraft, ARMOR and ERA for Russia first.

FCS breaking on MBTs does not stop turret traverse

1 Like