The way i see it, the game should also be fun for players with limited skill. Not to mention, no matter how skilled you are, you can’t carry a team if it gets rolled on in the first few minutes (even if tbf T-series are probably not the main culprit for that one)
And between a player that misses a shot by some in game centimeters and someone who does not bother checking the corner, I have my personal opinion on who should rack up the kill at the end
I don’t consider T-series OP per se, but the inconsistance that comes with shooting at them (NERA and post pen damage) is just not fun and does not reward good gameplay at all
SBMM will show what tank/plane/ship is OP in like 3 days
We will get a honest picture of what META narrative they’ve created
Ofc, the DEVS saw that from two step ahead then proceed to cover their ears when we say SBMM
That’s is too much work on Mondays report when people flocked to OP vehicles while the other side is complaining the BALANCE.
More of a question is what Soviet tank has ERA in 9.0 like the closest one is T-72B at 10.3 i thinks hes failed to kill Magach with blazer and thinks that is Soviet tank.
I watched a prop drop 3 differnet GBUs on a ruski heavies head while i constantly shot it. Not sure what happemed in the end as i was killed by his team mate… stalinium
Yes. Its only russia again like other examples. Easiest to see is adding russian paper ships after the german tanks removed. Some bias is just more blatant
There are no paper ships in War Thunder. [Inb4 you claim M10 Booker is a paper tank by citing laid down ships.]
Soviets don’t have any meta tanks, at all.
So why do your posts contain lies?
T-55AMD1 isn’t even a top 10 9.0 tank.
T-55M is notably superior on its own.
M60A3 TTS is superior.
Etc.
Edit:
Germany has more laid down [only] ships in the game than USSR.
They figured out a new way to screw NATO and give an artificial buff to russian MBTs.
Let’s add a power system that only NATO vehicles have, and make it so if it’s destroyed, the FCS is destroyed too, thus the ability for you to shoot or turn the turret (happens in Leclercs). Oh and, let’s implement the said power system on the front and back of the vehicle, to make you unable to shoot back if you’re shot anywhere (because the FSC is in the middle of the tank as well). Let’s also add a turret basket for all of them (just to make sure)
On the other hand, in russian MBTs : no power system, FCS system doesn’t take out the gun/turret, not any kind of turret basket implemented
The Soyuz was under construction with a pretty large part of the hull finished when they were invaded
To call it paper is an exageration as we have plenty of other ships in other tech trees, which were in similar states, added.
This doesn’t mean there aren’t points of contention. Soyuz’s main belt being a single plate is contentious as there are multiple claims soviet naval industry couldn’t manufacture that type of armour steel at that thickness.
The guns/shells existed, but were never put in the naval triple mount so dispersion/reload rates are dubious.
Those are really the only things to care about on that ship.
To scream “russian bias fantasy ship” is just a lazy excuse from some top naval players to not learn how to actually deal with it.
Granted, it is an absolute bully to ships a br below it, but that goes for most ships.
Regards,
Someone who spaded Yamato week 1 of update leviathans.
