Russian Bias in 2026?

Well aware hence why I stated it.

I am not a radar specialist but I know bits and bobs here and there mate.
I am also aware that if we could defeat stealth tech as easily as you’re on about no one would be invensting trillions across the globe into it.

Again aware, hence the reference to using IRST and teh radar in conjuction, however in game it’s very different.
hence the damn point the game is not ready for stealth tech

The F22 being one of hte most aged Stealth crafts out there, we mnow have F35s and Su57s cruising around

I don’t wonder a damn thing lol, I predominantly play ground RB hence the tens of thousands of ground games.

I also don’t do badly at higher Br air either?
Extremely average, that also includes using most my rank 8s in GRB for cas OR CAP

it literally works in game VS AESA radars ? don’t you not know that?.

1 Like

In game chaff literally works VS AESA radars

Hence the point that the vast majority of equipment and technology at top tier isn’t working right and the game is not in fact ready for Stealth jets.
As @H_ngma said top tier is held together with a band aid right now.

1 Like

Stealth technology gives you an advantage over older technology, but against modern technology it is almost useless in terms of detection range, it’s 70 km compared to 60 km. In IRL

It’s definitely a key factor, right now top tier ground is seriously lop sided ARB at 13.3 as well, most folsk right now are too busy bickering over what tank i sbetter or worse to look at the bigger picture.

Leaves less room to pay credence to the ODL theory, at least, on such a large scale being as much of an affecting factor.

pretty much, now watch as the thread gets locked lol

1 Like

Substantially betterthan no stealth tech which is my point, however I am meaning more so the game itself is no where near ready for it mecahnics wise.
everything is so broken and half assed it’s beyond a joke.

The game still has a long way to go: ECM, larger maps, next-generation missiles, better radar modelling, and more distinct differences between missiles

1 Like

I’m not surprised at all why I start arguments with those who sit in the “Russian bias” threads.
My bad.

What lol?
You bounced in ehre with no idea what you’re on about just to troll?

You’re the one who doesn’t have any arguments, and I don’t believe in “Russian bias,” so

1 Like

He’s a troll man. Don’t bother

I don’t tend to lean that way myself but recent motnhs have been rather telling

Ai maxxing

2 Likes

That’s okay - if you don’t want to answer the actual topic of the BMPT and Russian Bias in 2026…now, on to a really important question.

Bearing in mind my original point after posting up a hit log of me tanking 4x PARS ATGMS while sat in a stock BMPT in the middle of a cap.

“In fact it is so bad that anybody who ever says that Gaijin isn’t blatantly favouring the RU tech tree with BS vehicle modelling, BS vehicle performance and BS vehicle options is a complete and total muppet.”

Would you like to be Beaker or Kermit? I’m thinking you’d probably be more Beaker myself.

image

Dudes actual statement before hand makes no sense in english either

1 Like

Dont engage man , ive usually been a fighter of Russian biases and malarkey as such. Right now weve

All the crap with GRB, BMPT, PANTSIR SVSM, 38MT reload buff t80s etc.

Arb weve the su30 premium dominant tk the point ive copped one.
Su30mk2 at top tier slamming as well.

Naval at higher / top tier is domiated by the sveskry or whatever it is.

But this dudes just baiting

2 Likes

I’m gonna be that guy but I’ve tanked more than 4 PARS/Spikes in a ZTZ99A and even a Challenger 2 and Type 10 without taking damage

The BMPT is busted
PARS and Spikes are also just crap at dealing damage at times

Spoiler

Never

1 Like

both PESA and AESA can go into track mem when bad guy plane is notching and changing alt.

1 Like

Yes it does not work against ESA radars in real life but for balance and gameplay loop purposes they do in war thunder. No towed decoys or ecm modeled yet.

Sovetsky Soyuz

Now onto a game of : spot the OP armor layout that doesn't exist IRL

1 -


2 -
3 -

And now onto : guess the OP shell that defies physics ?

1 -
shot 2026.05.24 06.13.24
2 -
shot 2026.05.24 06.13.33
3 -
shot 2026.05.24 06.13.48

Answers

If you answered 2 on the first question - tons of additional armor in the front offering additional protection to ammo rack and 420mm plate of cemented armor that didn’t even exist - and 3 on the second question - shell with as much pen as the other 406mm and almost as much as a 460 while having almost twice the explosive amount and +50m/s of muzzle velocity relative to its competition - congratulations ! you win

1 Like