I don’t disagree…but am just saying the su35 is the only russian jet seen with the double racks…and somehow that justified double racks for the su27sm su30sm2 and su30sm2…why not the premium flankers that same space between the engines and they still don’t have the double…why not same logic used on other planes(ef2k recently did)
The logic is if they use the same racks and mounting systems across their aircraft, they can get it. I’m not 100% sure if the other aircraft have been seen with those racks either.
Fun fact, same applies for a debate.
You make a claim you in fact have to defend that claim with a source.
Otherwise it is known as heresay, as i previously stated.
Since when is working not an excuse 😂 you are definitely being intentionally obtuse to try make a point.
I cannot sit and research for, or over documents on trunnions whilst i work.
I rarely stop once I start. Ive actually wasted time here which should be directed to preparing a C1 class.
The main point? To you maybe but initially you stated i didnt know they had been added which was nonsense. What they’ve been added to isn’t entirely relevant.to the initial point is it.
Which means you’re either getting mixed up or moving goalposts.
You’re taking my use of the time played as some form of attack, when i merely used it as a basis of where my reasoning/ line of thinking came from.
It’s not a counter argument, i am not trying to counter argue your playtime nor experience.
I was / am as stated using it as more ancedotal evidence to again sustain my point.
So maybe for a grown ass man with responsibility especially of such a large finance company, you should be less emotionally invested in an online debate.
In which rather than waste all this time replying could of fired a link across, same as I would had you asked.
Not at all, what a brazen comment to make when knowing literally nothing about another persons life, my time management skills are pretty spot on, learned them from a very young age.
I just know what is a priority , the WT forum doesn’t take much precedence in my life to dictate i have to manage my actual IRL time, to facilitate using it constantly .
I used to, a year or so ago, but now adays no.
As you can see via comment history.
Pretty consistently responding, bar hours of sleep.
Yeah actively taking the time to use my phone to respond to you specifically.
He isn’t wrong though, he also kindly made your point for you by the way so any further replies shall have to he on topic related to russian stuff etc.
Or not at all.
While I agree that university thesis is nowhere near to forum debates, I still think you should back your statements up with a source if you wish to convince opponent and other people reading this thread. Adds weight to words in debate.
1 Like
Oh I completely agree on that part, in fact I try share/post revelant sources as much as possible.
The thing is, I’m not going to hold his hand on this matter on Monday during the busiest time of the week, especially since a quick one-minute search reveals there’s already a thread dedicated entirely to this topic.
If what I was claiming required much more in-depth and complex evidence, I would have told him that I didn’t have time to share it right then, but that I could send it to him when I had a chance.
1 Like
if where talking naval the only really russian bias thing is the soyuz but rest of tree is relativley fine
i see more american bias than russian in naval
2 best 8.7 1st best 8.3 4 best 7.7 etc best cruisers and best destroyers the only thing thats lacking is 7.3 but thats way better than any other naval tree over all
Minimal sources on a modern missile?!?!? Inconceivable!
Not really though
okay how about the mig-29 manual, it states that the r-73 has irccm
now it’s not the manufacturer themselves saying it, but the user of the said missile
Who keeps reporting my brainrot!
2 Likes
Yes, without irony. Even without BMPT and CAS NATO would have lower winrate than Soviet/russia
Not true, previous data would say otherwise.
Literally November 2025 before terminator release
And my personal favourite: sim ground battles where playerbase strictly separated in red vs blue
No amount of handholding would ever enough for NATO to hold good wr in sim while having better lineups than red(8_2, 8_2_2, 9_2)
Hell, they don’t even bother upgrading the turret even though they say it’s different and upgraded. Apart from that they give the AIM and M1A2T the same turret armor as US which realistically should not be the same, just means they copy and paste the abrams go figure. If you look in game no values change at all.
1 Like
Are you talking SIM? If you are I’m sorry I thought you were talking GRB, I have not looked at SIM.
I dropped November realistic first picture, only then I mentioned sim
1 Like
So from June to August what happened there? Did all those insanely skilled ussr players just collectively go out and enjoy the sun?
1 Like
Okay, I don’t know anything about SIM so that’s someones elses conversation.