LOAL and the radar seeker.
4 Likes
I mean that does kinda make sense. I wouldn’t wanna get hit by some random friendly Brimstone…
But then why not just add them with an IR seeker like MT?? At LEAST it’s still FNF Brimstones. 🥀
Well i mean if theyre not LOAL then the danger would be the same as with current IR guided AGMs so i dont really get that explanation…
The snail works in mysterious ways.
2 Likes
It is, you basically refuse to make 5 min search and demanding from opposite side.
I can claim whatever I want, if you want disprove it however it’s your job to find the actual source.
Quite amount of T-Series benefits from this a lot, haven’t countered another nations tanks that recieved this feature then I again I didn’t checked deliberately every single one of them.
In that case I have an account that is 11 years old and I have much more hours in this game, just because you didn’t counter it nor acknowledge it doesnt mean its not there.
Gameplay time is not your strong suit against me, try harder.
Same here, you’re not the only one who works and has tons of responsibilities, especially when you’re working at multimillion dollar company’s finance department., doesn’t mean you cannot follow revelants threads in this forum.
Seems like you’re not active enough considering you asked evidence multiple times.
Asking proof means you’re trying to debunk my claim which in this case its up to you find revelant sources.
It seems you dont even know the basic debating rules.
And I have much more games than you between rank 7 and 9, so what’s your point?
I’m pretty sure my job requires much more efforts than yours so you can take it with a grain of salt.
Leopards benefits least from trunnion, the post literally explains that how T-Series and Abrams benefits from it most.
@Jεcka almost forgot, sorry
This osa tried its best but there isnt much to do vs 8 vikhrs. Just kept adding them 1 by 1.
If you go to say, university and write up a thesis, whos job is it to provide a source to the claims made in said thesis?
If you are even in high-school, and write an essay, does the teacher have to prove your sources? Or is it obligatory to attach a source to a claim.
I mentioned a counter point that in my experience that craps not happened, to which @H_ngma kindly posted me a link to what you mentioned.
As i genuinely lack time and haven’t even managed to turn on my laptop today and wont for another 8 hours to play or fact check.
As i am in fact working.
I know the 55s recieved it however I can double check for us tonight if you’d like.
But i assume its as poorly implemented as always.
Encounter* + I am acknowledging it, if i was to catagorically deny it, plus sources and say you were lying, which i didn’t i just said to show me.or throw me a source, and you flat out refused.
try harder , as if its a competition, i care not one wit for your gametime, nor should you care for mine the manner in which you are.
Many things have changed since i began playing, so my point is in that time ive never heard of a mention of trunnions soaking spall, in fact the only thing I’d heard about trunnions was related to the CR2 leak.
Sounds to me like you’d better focus more on that than the forum sir.
And that is as much time as I have ill.meed to address the rest later.
Thats a bold statement coming from one who’s practically active here every hour of the day lol.
But guess being a profesor en titular isn’t effort lol.
Grow up mate.
Yeah i know but this seems less like a “T series get an unfair, unrealistic advantage” situation but more like a “Germany gets screwed over again for no reason” situation.
If you think Thesis and debating are the same thing I got bad news for you buddy.
See he can find the revelant source by simply 5 minutes of searching just like everybody else, for the record I’m also working my ass off and replying you on my smoke breaks.
Its still not an excuse.
T-72B3/A,T-90M, terminators also recieved it which is the main point.
Thats pretty pisspor counter argument considering you’re the one who brought up first.
Now dont be shy.
Or I’m just simply managing my time better than you, maybe you should work on your managing skills cause it seems you lack that ability a lot.
Oh really then check the time gaps between my each message to you smart guy.
Its also really funny considering you also claim having no time to find revelant sources but can also reply my each messages under one hour constantly.
I guess some people do really suck when it comes to calculating and managing time, not my problem tho.
Debate wasn’t about if Germany is suffering more tbh but I understand your point.
I love how you went it can carry 16 max the went to 12…facts remain su30sm2 su30sm2 and su27sm should not have the double pylon but they do…they go against fighters with 6,8 and most recently the f15ge with 12. And super hornet with it’s accurate 14…with mcm still being a thing…you can shoot down all 6 or 8 missiles a Rafale or f16 will shoot at you and still have 6/8left to kill them with no skill just flying straight…that doesn’t sound like balance to me
It can carry a default of 12 missiles. The AMBER racks are still a concept and haven’t been fully adopted to my knowledge. Payload wise it’s fully capable of carrying 22 AMRAAMs as they would be roughly 8,000 lbs.
I don’t disagree…but am just saying the su35 is the only russian jet seen with the double racks…and somehow that justified double racks for the su27sm su30sm2 and su30sm2…why not the premium flankers that same space between the engines and they still don’t have the double…why not same logic used on other planes(ef2k recently did)
The logic is if they use the same racks and mounting systems across their aircraft, they can get it. I’m not 100% sure if the other aircraft have been seen with those racks either.
Fun fact, same applies for a debate.
You make a claim you in fact have to defend that claim with a source.
Otherwise it is known as heresay, as i previously stated.
Since when is working not an excuse 😂 you are definitely being intentionally obtuse to try make a point.
I cannot sit and research for, or over documents on trunnions whilst i work.
I rarely stop once I start. Ive actually wasted time here which should be directed to preparing a C1 class.
The main point? To you maybe but initially you stated i didnt know they had been added which was nonsense. What they’ve been added to isn’t entirely relevant.to the initial point is it.
Which means you’re either getting mixed up or moving goalposts.
You’re taking my use of the time played as some form of attack, when i merely used it as a basis of where my reasoning/ line of thinking came from.
It’s not a counter argument, i am not trying to counter argue your playtime nor experience.
I was / am as stated using it as more ancedotal evidence to again sustain my point.
So maybe for a grown ass man with responsibility especially of such a large finance company, you should be less emotionally invested in an online debate.
In which rather than waste all this time replying could of fired a link across, same as I would had you asked.
Not at all, what a brazen comment to make when knowing literally nothing about another persons life, my time management skills are pretty spot on, learned them from a very young age.
I just know what is a priority , the WT forum doesn’t take much precedence in my life to dictate i have to manage my actual IRL time, to facilitate using it constantly .
I used to, a year or so ago, but now adays no.
As you can see via comment history.
Pretty consistently responding, bar hours of sleep.
Yeah actively taking the time to use my phone to respond to you specifically.
He isn’t wrong though, he also kindly made your point for you by the way so any further replies shall have to he on topic related to russian stuff etc.
Or not at all.
While I agree that university thesis is nowhere near to forum debates, I still think you should back your statements up with a source if you wish to convince opponent and other people reading this thread. Adds weight to words in debate.
1 Like
Oh I completely agree on that part, in fact I try share/post revelant sources as much as possible.
The thing is, I’m not going to hold his hand on this matter on Monday during the busiest time of the week, especially since a quick one-minute search reveals there’s already a thread dedicated entirely to this topic.
If what I was claiming required much more in-depth and complex evidence, I would have told him that I didn’t have time to share it right then, but that I could send it to him when I had a chance.
1 Like