So it’s the same as IIR or EO Hellfires? None of them actually got past the mockup stages.
2 Likes
Check the revelant thread if you want to see his study.
Merkava 4 uses completely new armor, wth are you talking about?
That is the most critical part about missile which in this case it doesnt even exist.
Not even close, one is GNNS guided glide bombs/with rocket assisted while other one is much more complicated system.
Building proper IR missile that has onboard microchips, tracking and imaging system is much more complex and expensive than glide bombs and guess which nation suffers from it?
MT didn’t even used in the first place because it doesnt exists, why do you think we have not single seeker performance nor test fire footage on that missile?
Even LMUR which is a missile that suppose to have main in loop guidance system instead of true F&F does have multiple footages.
These are just lame excuses
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Rf3Olace2II
They have the META, sweat for the kd day and night, but still do sh*t like that lmao
It’s a more mobile Matilda tank with better front armor & slightly better gun.
3.7 when the superior armed KV-1s are 3.7 as well? Eh.
On another note, Russian bias remains fiction.
1 Like
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/c5B3rj_a0I4
Still waiting for NATO SPAAs to be able to do that
Plot twist: will never happen. Give everything to Russia/China, and nerf the ADATS
Thats not how burden of proof works.
If you make a claim you must back it up. As of yet what you’re doing us pure heresay without bringing any credible information to the table.
I will say it’s also the first time I’ve seen someone say the T90M trunion acts as armour.
As I’ve never had the issue whilst shooting them or using them.
Assuming you’re grown man you can search the forum itself to find revelant information on its thread, I don’t document every single post I see and surely not gonna spend my time to find them just to prove it to you.
You’re not a child so you don’t need handholding in this case.
Not my problem if you don’t follow revelant threads, I bet you also don’t know Gaijin added anti radiation line as part of armor to T-Series with recent uptades.
Its not my concern whether you have issues with gun trunnions or not but its known feature in this game, in fact Abrams is also famous soaking damage through its Gun trunnion and I believe @IHаteCAS posted multiple footages where his shell failed to penetrate Abrams Trunnion.
I suggest follow revelant threads more consistently instead of talking based on personal opinions.
Adding MITL would be way worse than keeping the current F&F implementation, imagine a MI28 (or an Israeli MH60 with spike NLOS) hovering 3 meters from spawn and slinging missiles after missile.
It’s not about hand holding.
At all.
then do not, and let me write this for you in bold, make the claim if you refuse to back it up.
I assume you mean liner and yes i am aware of it.
Though is it not only a smattering of tanks which have it last i looked.
A known feature a person with 6 years and 4200 hours has never heard of.
Or maybe its not a feature, a known issue or a known subject etc, a feature implies something important, interesting or typical of a place or thing.
When it’s none of those.
-
1 i work my ass off and do not and will not spend every waking minute following literally hundreds of thousands of threads.
-
2 I’ve been relatively active in catching up on most things off with the forums aka bug reports etc.
-
3 if you make a claim, stating it’s well known yet no one has mentioned it here bar you, it is up to you, to provide some kind of actual hard proof of said claim.
A persons videos are not hard proof.
While i know certainly parts of the russian mbts will soak spall, I’ve not seen anyone claim the trunions will completely eat a round, nor for abrams.
And ive nearly 3000 games between rank 7 + with both russia and USA.
So rather than be petulant about it, with remarks about, handholding, being a grown man etc, if you’ve such free time as to sit here all day and keep up with every single video posted, share it here.
Burden of proof
Seems to be more of a Leopard 2 issue than a certain T series boon.
1 Like
Thank you mate, I’ll give it a good read when I’ve a spare momemt.
Wasn’t their main point about that the fact that Brimstones have LOAL capability?
If so then why not just… add them to the game without LOAL???
I usually do try and play devils advocate when it comes to stuff like the MT (mostly because Japan CAS kinda sucks without it), but denying FNF Brimstones is just… dumb.
1 Like
LOAL and the radar seeker.
4 Likes
I mean that does kinda make sense. I wouldn’t wanna get hit by some random friendly Brimstone…
But then why not just add them with an IR seeker like MT?? At LEAST it’s still FNF Brimstones. 🥀
Well i mean if theyre not LOAL then the danger would be the same as with current IR guided AGMs so i dont really get that explanation…
The snail works in mysterious ways.
2 Likes
It is, you basically refuse to make 5 min search and demanding from opposite side.
I can claim whatever I want, if you want disprove it however it’s your job to find the actual source.
Quite amount of T-Series benefits from this a lot, haven’t countered another nations tanks that recieved this feature then I again I didn’t checked deliberately every single one of them.
In that case I have an account that is 11 years old and I have much more hours in this game, just because you didn’t counter it nor acknowledge it doesnt mean its not there.
Gameplay time is not your strong suit against me, try harder.
Same here, you’re not the only one who works and has tons of responsibilities, especially when you’re working at multimillion dollar company’s finance department., doesn’t mean you cannot follow revelants threads in this forum.
Seems like you’re not active enough considering you asked evidence multiple times.
Asking proof means you’re trying to debunk my claim which in this case its up to you find revelant sources.
It seems you dont even know the basic debating rules.
And I have much more games than you between rank 7 and 9, so what’s your point?
I’m pretty sure my job requires much more efforts than yours so you can take it with a grain of salt.
Leopards benefits least from trunnion, the post literally explains that how T-Series and Abrams benefits from it most.
@Jεcka almost forgot, sorry
This osa tried its best but there isnt much to do vs 8 vikhrs. Just kept adding them 1 by 1.
