It shouldn’t reduce it should effectively nullify the protection against KE/sabot IIRC
this happens with NATO stuff too.
3 Likes
Not even WT. This is just common knowledge. In terms of armor, Strv 122 is just add on from 2A6, both being C-Tech under the add on.
2A7V is actually D-Tech, so mb on that.
Merk Mk.4 armor is also add on, so go figure.
Any of you Russian Bias believers want to buy a KV-8 for $500 in 6 days? I’m looking to make some coin to get something useful
This tank is indestructible with Stalinium built right into it, you will cap, destroy and devour all other tanks simply cause it’s russian.
EDIT: DM me if you’re interested get it before they hit object and is7 levels.
1 Like
Technically it’s real because it’s a modular missile system which means the only difference between an MT and an ML is swapping out its laser seeker head for an IIR seeker
that’s why the X-38MT/ML also uncannily resembles the Grom-1E and Grom-2 bombs
I’m pretty sure that the MT is not as used as the ML because the IIR seeker head far more expensive but doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
1 Like
The point is though, the MT seeker has yet to be fully confirmed to have ever been built, with only mockups being seen, let alone actually equipped to a missile. Meanwhile Gaijin denied the possiblity of Spear-Glide for the Typhoon because despite Primary sources stating that every part has been built and tested, they wont add it because its not been seen fully assembled and test fired. So there is some major double standards going on there.
But if Mockups of a seeker is good enough… Then Typhoon (missiles) should be added, ASRAAMs with a HEAT warhead meant for A2G.
Finally, KH-38MTs remain some of the strongest FnF weapons in-game by quite a notable margin, especailly as they dont have to fight soviet SPAA usually (unless its Japan’s Su-30) and they were added waaaaaay too early and dominated for a very long time. Meanwhile even basic equivalents, such as SAL-Brimstone 2s have not been added. Another set of very annoying double standards. (heck their entire “why we wont add FnF Brimstones” post was hilariousily hypocritical when you consider the Su-34 with 6x KH-38MTs were added in the same update)
6 Likes
So it’s the same as IIR or EO Hellfires? None of them actually got past the mockup stages.
2 Likes
Check the revelant thread if you want to see his study.
Merkava 4 uses completely new armor, wth are you talking about?
That is the most critical part about missile which in this case it doesnt even exist.
Not even close, one is GNNS guided glide bombs/with rocket assisted while other one is much more complicated system.
Building proper IR missile that has onboard microchips, tracking and imaging system is much more complex and expensive than glide bombs and guess which nation suffers from it?
MT didn’t even used in the first place because it doesnt exists, why do you think we have not single seeker performance nor test fire footage on that missile?
Even LMUR which is a missile that suppose to have main in loop guidance system instead of true F&F does have multiple footages.
These are just lame excuses
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Rf3Olace2II
They have the META, sweat for the kd day and night, but still do sh*t like that lmao
1 Like
It’s a more mobile Matilda tank with better front armor & slightly better gun.
3.7 when the superior armed KV-1s are 3.7 as well? Eh.
On another note, Russian bias remains fiction.
1 Like
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/c5B3rj_a0I4
Still waiting for NATO SPAAs to be able to do that
Plot twist: will never happen. Give everything to Russia/China, and nerf the ADATS
Thats not how burden of proof works.
If you make a claim you must back it up. As of yet what you’re doing us pure heresay without bringing any credible information to the table.
I will say it’s also the first time I’ve seen someone say the T90M trunion acts as armour.
As I’ve never had the issue whilst shooting them or using them.
Assuming you’re grown man you can search the forum itself to find revelant information on its thread, I don’t document every single post I see and surely not gonna spend my time to find them just to prove it to you.
You’re not a child so you don’t need handholding in this case.
Not my problem if you don’t follow revelant threads, I bet you also don’t know Gaijin added anti radiation line as part of armor to T-Series with recent uptades.
Its not my concern whether you have issues with gun trunnions or not but its known feature in this game, in fact Abrams is also famous soaking damage through its Gun trunnion and I believe @IHаteCAS posted multiple footages where his shell failed to penetrate Abrams Trunnion.
I suggest follow revelant threads more consistently instead of talking based on personal opinions.
Adding MITL would be way worse than keeping the current F&F implementation, imagine a MI28 (or an Israeli MH60 with spike NLOS) hovering 3 meters from spawn and slinging missiles after missile.
It’s not about hand holding.
At all.
then do not, and let me write this for you in bold, make the claim if you refuse to back it up.
I assume you mean liner and yes i am aware of it.
Though is it not only a smattering of tanks which have it last i looked.
A known feature a person with 6 years and 4200 hours has never heard of.
Or maybe its not a feature, a known issue or a known subject etc, a feature implies something important, interesting or typical of a place or thing.
When it’s none of those.
-
1 i work my ass off and do not and will not spend every waking minute following literally hundreds of thousands of threads.
-
2 I’ve been relatively active in catching up on most things off with the forums aka bug reports etc.
-
3 if you make a claim, stating it’s well known yet no one has mentioned it here bar you, it is up to you, to provide some kind of actual hard proof of said claim.
A persons videos are not hard proof.
While i know certainly parts of the russian mbts will soak spall, I’ve not seen anyone claim the trunions will completely eat a round, nor for abrams.
And ive nearly 3000 games between rank 7 + with both russia and USA.
So rather than be petulant about it, with remarks about, handholding, being a grown man etc, if you’ve such free time as to sit here all day and keep up with every single video posted, share it here.
Burden of proof
Seems to be more of a Leopard 2 issue than a certain T series boon.
1 Like
Thank you mate, I’ll give it a good read when I’ve a spare momemt.
Wasn’t their main point about that the fact that Brimstones have LOAL capability?
If so then why not just… add them to the game without LOAL???
I usually do try and play devils advocate when it comes to stuff like the MT (mostly because Japan CAS kinda sucks without it), but denying FNF Brimstones is just… dumb.
1 Like