if where talking naval the only really russian bias thing is the soyuz but rest of tree is relativley fine
i see more american bias than russian in naval
2 best 8.7 1st best 8.3 4 best 7.7 etc best cruisers and best destroyers the only thing thats lacking is 7.3 but thats way better than any other naval tree over all
Minimal sources on a modern missile?!?!? Inconceivable!
Not really though
okay how about the mig-29 manual, it states that the r-73 has irccm
now it’s not the manufacturer themselves saying it, but the user of the said missile
Who keeps reporting my brainrot!
Yes, without irony. Even without BMPT and CAS NATO would have lower winrate than Soviet/russia
Not true, previous data would say otherwise.
Literally November 2025 before terminator release
No amount of handholding would ever enough for NATO to hold good wr in sim while having better lineups than red(8_2, 8_2_2, 9_2)
Hell, they don’t even bother upgrading the turret even though they say it’s different and upgraded. Apart from that they give the AIM and M1A2T the same turret armor as US which realistically should not be the same, just means they copy and paste the abrams go figure. If you look in game no values change at all.
Are you talking SIM? If you are I’m sorry I thought you were talking GRB, I have not looked at SIM.
I dropped November realistic first picture, only then I mentioned sim
So from June to August what happened there? Did all those insanely skilled ussr players just collectively go out and enjoy the sun?
Okay, I don’t know anything about SIM so that’s someones elses conversation.
Top tier Germany and us spaa were released in 25 June update. Players intend to drift for some time to get new vehicles how it was many times before.
Or get this: Maybe its not about the players but adding new vehicles that powercreep the game have a huge impact on winrates.
I know, mindblowing revelation.
What exactly spaa have to do with MBTs winrate? Winrate returns normal on its own. Or what German or us spaa were owning t-series?
They play the same games???
And mind-blowing how you ignore sim winrates with strict red vs blue playerbase without any mixed up match ups. With blue having better lineups but still losing
There were a couple of documents (nothing classified iirc) that stated that the armor solutions offered to the Australians for their AIMs was comparable to the US armor protection wise.
However I doubt I could find it again.
