Round being skewed is called destabilization, and is what happened to the rounds in the videos. Since spalling is based on residual penetration, a destabilized round with less penetration will… do less damage…
It reduces the effectiveness of ERA in game. Easy to check with t-80u ufp.
No they upgrade the glacis plate and armour. T-90M and T-72B3 use a T-72 (89) as the base hull they then equip the Relikt ERA. As proven by destroyed T-90M tanks that have been inspected
My friend War Thunder is not a good source. War Thunder thinks the M1A2 never upgraded its hull armour with decades of service.
War Thunder select which parts of realism they like and as we have moved into current day they do not have accurate sources.
We have statements from MoD “CR2 additional side armour is immune to 30mm autocannons”
Gaijin give the armour 30mm kinetic protection…
unless those at 12.7 are completely different to those at ~10.0, DEFINITELY NOT X)
It shouldn’t reduce it should effectively nullify the protection against KE/sabot IIRC
this happens with NATO stuff too.
3 Likes
Not even WT. This is just common knowledge. In terms of armor, Strv 122 is just add on from 2A6, both being C-Tech under the add on.
2A7V is actually D-Tech, so mb on that.
Merk Mk.4 armor is also add on, so go figure.
Any of you Russian Bias believers want to buy a KV-8 for $500 in 6 days? I’m looking to make some coin to get something useful
This tank is indestructible with Stalinium built right into it, you will cap, destroy and devour all other tanks simply cause it’s russian.
EDIT: DM me if you’re interested get it before they hit object and is7 levels.
1 Like
Technically it’s real because it’s a modular missile system which means the only difference between an MT and an ML is swapping out its laser seeker head for an IIR seeker
that’s why the X-38MT/ML also uncannily resembles the Grom-1E and Grom-2 bombs
I’m pretty sure that the MT is not as used as the ML because the IIR seeker head far more expensive but doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
1 Like
The point is though, the MT seeker has yet to be fully confirmed to have ever been built, with only mockups being seen, let alone actually equipped to a missile. Meanwhile Gaijin denied the possiblity of Spear-Glide for the Typhoon because despite Primary sources stating that every part has been built and tested, they wont add it because its not been seen fully assembled and test fired. So there is some major double standards going on there.
But if Mockups of a seeker is good enough… Then Typhoon (missiles) should be added, ASRAAMs with a HEAT warhead meant for A2G.
Finally, KH-38MTs remain some of the strongest FnF weapons in-game by quite a notable margin, especailly as they dont have to fight soviet SPAA usually (unless its Japan’s Su-30) and they were added waaaaaay too early and dominated for a very long time. Meanwhile even basic equivalents, such as SAL-Brimstone 2s have not been added. Another set of very annoying double standards. (heck their entire “why we wont add FnF Brimstones” post was hilariousily hypocritical when you consider the Su-34 with 6x KH-38MTs were added in the same update)
6 Likes
So it’s the same as IIR or EO Hellfires? None of them actually got past the mockup stages.
2 Likes
Check the revelant thread if you want to see his study.
Merkava 4 uses completely new armor, wth are you talking about?
That is the most critical part about missile which in this case it doesnt even exist.
Not even close, one is GNNS guided glide bombs/with rocket assisted while other one is much more complicated system.
Building proper IR missile that has onboard microchips, tracking and imaging system is much more complex and expensive than glide bombs and guess which nation suffers from it?
MT didn’t even used in the first place because it doesnt exists, why do you think we have not single seeker performance nor test fire footage on that missile?
Even LMUR which is a missile that suppose to have main in loop guidance system instead of true F&F does have multiple footages.
These are just lame excuses
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Rf3Olace2II
They have the META, sweat for the kd day and night, but still do sh*t like that lmao
1 Like
It’s a more mobile Matilda tank with better front armor & slightly better gun.
3.7 when the superior armed KV-1s are 3.7 as well? Eh.
On another note, Russian bias remains fiction.
1 Like
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/c5B3rj_a0I4
Still waiting for NATO SPAAs to be able to do that
Plot twist: will never happen. Give everything to Russia/China, and nerf the ADATS
Thats not how burden of proof works.
If you make a claim you must back it up. As of yet what you’re doing us pure heresay without bringing any credible information to the table.
I will say it’s also the first time I’ve seen someone say the T90M trunion acts as armour.
As I’ve never had the issue whilst shooting them or using them.