Russian Bias in 2026?

I stated the round is worse overall which it is. That was all.
I’ve also mentioned other chinese MBTs but specifically for the WZ alone it has higher pen of course. As I stated above.

Yup won’t hear an argument here but to say it’s a big weakspots not entirely true either, it’s not that big it’s just a weakspot

Can say the same for the WZ when I come across it as well.

There are players like this, but they only made up of the 0.1% players populations lol there is a few here who has those number, which indicating that they could indeed carry most of the matches. First obvious thing you see is the extremely high kill per spawn on average, like having 500 matches on the Abrams and statshark says he average killed 4-5 enemy per spawn and maintaining 80% winning rate. (what does it mean? if he goes one match without any kill, expect him to have 10 kills the next match to maintain that KPS, and you only find purple tags on their page). This win rate is simply not possible for someone with 1kd, because 1kd is extremely easy to achieve by holding W to the objective point like headless chicken/zombie. Funny how a lot of players with 1kd thinks they are some kind of MVP having 4 kills 4 deaths in a match, like they completely forgot that their 4 deaths on average also donates a lot sp to the enemy team to respawn and drain the team’s tickets, so if you have 2-3 players in your team that go 5 kills 5 deaths, then expect to hear the nuke siren and check the score board to see the nuke plane isn’t from your team.

I love BRs where you can actually influence that.
{E75D00F8-5579-4A6A-A0F7-D9DCA42182B0}

Gimbal won’t be an issue if they implement datalink, so the Raptor doesn’t have to depend on it’s own radar to acquire and lock targets.

If Gaijin keeps the game the way it is, with most fights being medium range range HOBS Fox-3 spam, then the better Gimbal will definitely help.

This is true, but we’ll likely have better missiles by the time 5th gens come out.

like what?

the only thing they could really do is fix amraam pull, so it isnt terrible

you know, give 120C and 120D the doubled (or more) fin AoA they have irl

1 Like

C-7s, D-3s…

The main one I had in mind was the later model 9Xs. Don’t those things have a stupidly high effective range?

true, even early 9x max range is probably ~50km or so, given that 9m is ~30km and 9x has much less drag

and should probably have ~20km effective range

1 Like

Then yeah, I could totally see a meta where you abuse your stealth to get behind/above people and rain 9Xs down on them.

in which case a higher gimbal limit (or datalink) would help a ton.

They have less range than r73s do. Late amraam models are up to gaijin if they will pull more but regardless they are nowhere near r77 ranges.

F22 could be added now if they have everyone else better missiles and su35 where applicable

Aim9X can be fired with soft lock?

I do believe later model 9Xs can do LOAL.

Not sure.

I don’t believe that. If you have a source then I’d like to see it.

image

1 Like

R74 not r73 my bad. I dont have a source saved but I can probably post it later once I have more time available

1 Like

Of course, take your time.

I don’t think R-74 can outrange the 9X, to my understanding the R-74 is just a 73 made by a different company.

I don’t know if any R-73/74 variants even get and upgraded motor, but someone like @kizvy or @GitGood most likely does.

Well, after comparing info sources a while ago with kizvy, there is no R-74 missile, only R-74M and M2 aka RVV-MD and MD2 in export.
MD2 is said to have longer but time for its motor. Can’t say anything about MD for now

1 Like

Thanks a ton man.

Also what’s the difference between 73/74M/74M2?

I remember reading a while ago 74M had a higher gimbal limit and that 74M2 had a lower RCS for the Su-57, not sure how accurate that is.

74M has a gimbal increase, and a new dual-band seeker head. M2 has smaller fins to fit Su-57 side bays, has IOG and DL as well on top of dual band seeker

1 Like

Thanks a ton. ^^

“No one is to blame for the fact that when the F-15 was created, its main competitors were the MiG-21, and to this day it is perhaps the most combat-capable aircraft ever made! It’s not my fault, it’s not America’s fault, and I’m not a fan of American doctrine! This opinion became widespread almost as an excuse from the USSR, as if they were saying: ‘We had the best aircraft 30 years ago, but then the Americans invented the F-15 and sent everything backward in time, which wasn’t fair!’ Those were simply the technological capabilities of the USSR at the time.

You’d better just play WT and watch your stats so they don’t get ruined, because you understand nothing about military technology! We’re talking about real machines, not BR and win rate!

I’ll tell you something else about the F-111, for example — the first aircraft in the world capable of fighting in all weather conditions 24/7, 365 days a year, and it entered service in 1967, which means it was designed at least 10–15 years earlier! For comparison, I’m not even sure people in the Eastern Bloc knew what a color television was at that time…

Also, the Su-27 was created as a direct competitor to the F-15 and was supposed to surpass it by 20 percent in everything! Yet despite being newer than the F-15, it falls behind in every single technical parameter! At least you should understand that, because there are statistics. The Cobra maneuver is something that in real life turns you into a flying target!

Anyone with an IQ higher than room temperature knows that a nation incapable of inventing a diesel car — or, generally speaking, a car that isn’t complete garbage — or a smartphone or a computer, simply cannot compare to the industry of countries that don’t use holes in the ground instead of toilets!”

image

1 Like