Russian Bias in 2026?

Gimbal wont be an issue if it has lower rcs. Amraams dont pull much off bore either way

Can you actually write a sentence that makes sense then? Because by the looks of it both me and @Dzhkグ thought the same thing and answered to it but I see you only answer to my post with arrogance.

Have you even checked the F-22’s T/W ratio or flight chart? Seems like you didn’t.

F-22 also features 2D thrust vectoring.

R37M wasn’t designed to hunt proper fighters but rather AWACS platfroms from very long range, its not suitable for HOBS shots and can only carry 4 of them internally.

And what makes you think Raptors AESA radar is bad or hasn’t recieved any upgrade during its lifetime?

Thales Company won the contract in 2024 and integrating Scorpion HMD’s to F-22 fleet.

You could’ve simply find this information on recent posts before posting it.

Pantsir SM-SV, LMUR missiles and KH-38MT also overperforms.

Thats irl
This, is a video game.
Video game performance does not reflect IRL performance.
Your glorious F-15 isn’t fighting primarily MiG-21s now is it?

Israel doesn’t even have a top tier tech tree AESA radar.
While the US has one of the best 14.3 aircraft in the game…
There’s also other nations without 14.7 aircraft but let’s just forget about them shall we?
Clearly only the US is important, screw everybody else.

Still stuck with bumraams
And a low missile count.
Chances are it doesn’t get hmd as well.
At least a variant without hmd may be added.

Chud F-22 raptorfanboy vs gigachad 4.5 gen MCM-maxxer:

Same scenario for the Su-57 when it gets added.

4 Likes

Just so you know, I explicitly stated about the F-22 HMD that I only had a rough read on the past posts and could be wrong

There seems to be a theme of cherry picking information for russion tanks imo.

You just jump into conclusions

I think a big misconception about armor is not about how good it is, but how much coverage it provides. Russian tanks benefit from coverage due to their design philosophy, specifically from the front. It’s why the Abrams has decent armor but the large areas of poor coverage hinder it.

armour is a factor on any tank,

Apart from US and Israel only Sweden lacks 14.7 which can be easily solve by fixing Gripen E’s flight performance and RWR coverage band.

1 Like

8 missiles with internal capacity and 16 with beast mode iirc.

Considering they tested HMD back in 2010’s chances are it will recieve it if it comes with other 5th gen’s.

much better stealth so the missile will be useles… again f-22 win sniff a su-57 from 5x the distance the su-57 will which will get killed long before it will be able to lock the f-22

nope new pantsir is also OP which will deny anything the enemy team throws with few normal S-1 free spawns it is a no fly zone and your ordnance you lanuched won’t get into the AO

True true.

I personally find my WZ to be rather squishy. The VT4A1 takes more hits, which literally makes no sense either.

It has worse magnification overall even if it has commander optics they’re still not as good as the gunners optics.

But fair enough.

I should of specifically said gunners optics on the BVM are better than both commander and gunner magnification on the WZ.
Of course rhe commander is objectively worse lol.

No i shouldn’t, the WZ1001 has more pen than all the other chinese rounds as well as it has the L/55 caliber cannon and has higher velocity and marginally more pen.

The actual round fired from the ztz99, VT4A1 or in fact any other chines MBT is worse performance wise than the 3BM60.

The round is worse overall bar on the WZ.

I am talking about the round being worse than 3BM60.

Not really the entire turret 😂 while not a T90M. It’s definitely not a weakspot, especially due to the ERA.

6 internal + 8 + 2 ir

While su57 has 4 internal + 4 + 2 ir

J20 has 4 internal + 2 ir + 8 + 2 ir external.

F35 is limited to 4 internal + 2 ir external + 4

I mean you can kinetically evade both pantsirs (and tunguska) pretty easily its just your munitions

Yeah evading the SM SV is insanely easy…if thats the only thing you wanna do instead of doing anything useful.

1 Like

We’re talking about WZ, not other Chinese tanks tho.

Its so easy to OHK BVM through its turret and when if you cant kill it with single shot you surely can cripple it.

Its quite big weakspot and its totally normal considering its suppose to be cheap upgrade rather than building entirely new tank.

1 Like

Even if you actively try to evade on open sky its not easy.

The only effective way to survive against SM-SV is either hide behind terrain or just stay away from battlefield at all.

Pulling to the side so you are perpendicular to it helps very much with dodging it, as sometime the shrapnell decides to to the Gaijin special and you survive.
Tho it is only sometimes, it is by no means a reliable tactic, you will die trying to dodge it.

Oh yeah if youre not anywhere near hard cover youre toast but i meant more like its quite easy to evade depending on the map if you can just fly fast behind cover. But as soon as you need to show yourself to, for example, fire a couple of Spices things get dicy very quickly.