Russian Bias in 2026?

[IHаteCAS]

@The_Long_One

He was actually explaining to me that the Leopard was supposedly one of the best-armored tanks.

It is. It has the best armor in the game, only being rivalled by T-90M, which trades far too much to get its armor to be a good tank.

@The_Long_One

Is it more heavily armored than the Leclerc?

Yes. By far.

@The_Long_One

Maybe than the Abrams?

Yes.

@The_Long_One

Or perhaps than the T-80

Yes.

@The_Long_One

which, when hiding their lower glacis plate, are nearly impossible to kill?

Driver port. They also heavily struggle to hide their LFP due to lack of depression. NATO tanks are also largely immune when just their turrets are showing, unless you shoot the breach, which goes for RU tanks as well.

@The_Long_One

German tanks like the Panther I and all Tigers are better than the Russian ones all the way to top tier! Especially during World War II, where German tanks achieved great success despite the Russians’ numerical superiority. In the game, however, the reality is that a Panther cant survive a hit from a rock to the turret and then become completely useless afterward.

I’m not going to indulge in wehraboo nonsense tbh.

@The_Long_One

And what about the Russian SPAA Pantsir-S1? It gets more tank kills than the PUMA VJTF!

What?

@The_Long_One

As for the guy IhateCAS — let’s call him STATSMAN — I checked his stats and they’re nothing special.

A’s in my username are cyrillic, here’s my profile if you want. StatShark - See All Player, Missile, and Vehicle Statistics.
My monthly before I took a break from the game:

Spoiler

@The_Long_One

He’s probably one of those “rats” who spend the whole match waiting for their one flashy kill.

I play relatively aggressive and definitely get killed because of it.

@The_Long_One

I neutralize enemy capture points sometimes five times in a single match, which is a thankless job because it gives neither money nor experience. Stats don’t win games, and that’s something those rats will never understand! I die and go right back to the position again and again, distracting the enemy and forcing them to react — even if I only make two tanks stop and look around for me, I’ve already contributed to my team.

You are below average in every category of stats so I don’t buy it.

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[Das_Jukes]

10.7 to 12.7 is getting incredibly repetative

Relentless waves of T-80/72/90s (due to how many variants are in the tech tree)

Unkillable hull down BMPTs holding capture points (its battle rating is irrelevant, its not fit for War Thunder in its current state)

NATO CAS being killed before they’ve got over the battlefield

Russian CAS flying around pretty much unapposed with the best air to ground missiles

Are Russian players not bored of the 5 minute, race to spawn kill matches?

[The_Long_One]

“When statistics matter, will you end up multi-accounting?”

[The_Long_One]

A clever person drastically changes their name when creating multiple accounts.

[iegaatdao]

oops!
Apparently the ammo belt that connects point A (Ammo rack) and Point B (autocannon) are actually 2 belts with bluetooth tech and can’t be ammo racked!

Well now f&·$% you and your blow out panels because there is a hard coded chance that they won’t work and they will kill your crew, based on loader openin the hatch! Even if you haven’t fired a round in 5 minutes!

[Ion_492]

Wrong player, they have a Cyrillic letter in the username I believe.

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

I only have one account lol, one of those people there is a friend who did it as a joke.

my name is a parody of a youtuber’s ign

You can do a little bit of research to confirm whether we’re different people or not.

[Kievskiy_Minipig]

Are you framing random accounts which happen to have similar name? By this logic even devs use multiple accounts:

Guess bvvd is using alts to get 67 k/d on chinese t26.

[Selascо]

just rename the game to PutinThunder at this point

[SandmanSix]

Take it from me, you are literally arguing with people who will put their entire identity on Russian Bias. Even if you found solid proof. At the end of the day it’s a waste of time proving anything when they will find the smallest flaw and cling to it from 99% of evidence.

You are better of proving water is wet than talking to people on forums is what I’ve learned. It’s a video game at the end of the day.

[iegaatdao]

“activate the BVVD liquidation protocol”

[_Renzo]

Going negative in the 2A7V wasn’t enough of an L for you, so now you just accuse random people of having second accounts with no basis?

[The_Long_One]

Listen now, pro player! I’m talking about the characteristics of the machines, which have absolutely nothing to do with your amazing stats. I honestly don’t care how great of a player you are! If we believe your statistics, you win around 60 out of 100 games. I have entire days where the game puts me with people who never even leave the spawn zone. But apparently you either never get matches like that, or you wipe out the entire enemy team and carry every 6 out of 10 games!

Anyway, I don’t care about statistics. You might be an incredible player, but you’re not very smart. For example, in the Russian tech tree there’s a 14.7 aircraft, while in the American one there isn’t. The best fighter jets in the world are American, and that’s not some stupid statistic from a stupid person. I was still a student when the F-22 was being developed, and the Su-57 still isn’t fully in service yet — and I’m almost 40 years old. The F-22 is still the best fighter jet! Yet the Su-57 will enter the game and somehow be better than the F-22!

Have a nice life and enjoy the game! I wish you over a 90% win rate in your statistics!

[Whisloy]

@The_Long_One

The F-22 is still the best fighter jet! Yet the Su-57 will enter the game and somehow be better than the F-22!

No HMD

[Panther2995]

@Whisloy

No HMD

HMD system already started to integrate F22’s.

[Whisloy]

Brother that thing started 10 years ago

[Panther2995]

@An Pigeon

Better mobility but slower reload meaning less firepower overall.

The difference is 1 round per minute.

practically speaking you will put same amount of pressure on both tanks.

@An Pigeon

True there, if you can reverse.

In that case BVM is also as good as dead but still doesnt change the fact.

@An Pigeon

holes on the Wz if they havent been fixed you used to be able to shoot basically clean through its turret armour.

I don’t know if that was the case in past but on my recent gameplay my WZ’s turret armor was standing against multiple rounds.

@An Pigeon

It literally has 6x - 11x magnification which is worse than the 4- 12 on the BVM.

Panther2995:

Yeah in return it has access to much better commander optics with CITV. WZ has better optics overall.

@An Pigeon

and commandwrs optics than the BVM.

Commander optics on BVM has fixed 5X zoom and doesnt even have CITV, wth are you talking about?

@An Pigeon

Its almost the same however the chinese round is marginally worse.

DTC-125 fired from WZ1001: 588mm penetration

3BM60 fired from BVM: 580mm penetration.

You should check your sources next time.

@An Pigeon

hull protection and ERA coverage

Thats rich considering BVM’s entire turret is weakspot.

[Panther2995]

@Whisloy

Brother that thing started 10 years ago

And? You claimed Raptor doesn’t have HMD while in real life sensor upgrades integration already started, in fact Lockheed also integrating IRST system as well.

[Whisloy]

@Panther2995

And? You claimed Raptor doesn’t have HMD while in real life sensor upgrades integration already started, in fact Lockheed also integrating IRST system as well.

Well then you talking about new Raptor not the F-22A which doesnt have HMD